Tuesday, April 25, 2006

The Futility of Interfaith Dialogue

Have you ever wondered about this thing called 'interfaith dialogue' - the dialogue so beloved by our weak politicians and clergy? Well, wonder no longer. Please let me elucidate...

For dialogue with an enemy - and make no mistake about it, Islam is the enemy of the liberal and democratic West - please read my earlier article here - to serve any purpose, there must be a possibility of finding some middle ground. A compromise must be found. If it is not possible to find a compromise, then engaging in dialogue becomes not only futile, but meaningless, too. Engaging in such a dialogue with Islam, a so-called 'interfaith dialogue', is precisely that: futile and meaningless.

You might well ask how I can say this with such certainty. Well, the answer is really quite simple to comprehend...

In Islam, we have a faith which is diametrically opposed to everything Christianity says is true. The tenets of both faiths couldn't be more different. Christians are taught that God had a Son, born of the Virgin Mary, who came down to earth and died for their sins, quasi to redeem them, to save them. Hence, Jesus Christ is their Lord and Saviour, their Redeemer. He died on the cross to save their souls. Further, to Christians, God is loving and forgiving, merciful and compassionate indeed.

Muslims are taught, by contrast, that God never begat a son; indeed, in Islam it is sacrilege to believe so. The whole concept of the Trinity, so essential to the belief system of a Christian, is considered to be shirk, or polytheism to any practising Muslim.

Furthermore, Jesus in Islam, although revered as a major prophet, is nothing more than this. He is not considered to be the Godhead. Muslims have an unshakeable belief that God is unique and one - tawhid - and cannot conceive of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Christians, in their eyes, are considered to be guilty of polytheism for believing in the Trinity! The abstract concept of there being three bodies in one - actually just like the human body - is beyond their understanding and comprehension.

So, to believe that Jesus is man's Saviour and Redeemer is totally and utterly alien to Muslims. As far as they are concerned, indeed as far as they are convinced, Jesus was not crucified at all. They believe that a look-alike was crucified in his stead!

For a devout and practising Christian, there can be no compromising on these issues; likewise, for a devout and practising Muslim, there can also be no compromising on them, either.

So would someone like to explain to me what all this 'interfaith dialogue' is about? For what compromise is there to be? Perhaps I'm missing something; but I don't think so.

You see, the differences between Islam and Christianity are so clear in even the basic understanding of the concept of God in the two religions. The name for God in Islam is Allah. Allah is also the name for God for Christian Arabs. But the Christians' understanding of God (and the Christian Arabs' understanding of Allah) is very different from the Muslims understanding of Him. For anyone seriously to believe that these two deities are the same, he would have to be seriously deluded. To a Muslim, Allah is to be feared; to a Christian, He is the kind and understanding and merciful Father.

The fact of the matter is clear: 'Interfaith dialogue' is a mechanism thought up by the weak and ineffectual in a desperate attempt to find a solution to the growing chasm in Western society, a chasm between the ever-growing Muslim population and the rest. (Do we ever hear calls for 'interfaith dialogue' from Muslims?) But it is merely a Band Aid. It will never solve the problems that have been shored up for us over the past few decades, never solve the problems of increasing tensions which will inevitably ensue.

Truth is: Our politicians, because they have lacked the foresight to see the inevitable outcome of their lax immigration laws, because they have lacked the courage to enact sensible laws to stem the growing problem of immigration in this country, and because they have failed to lead, they have got us all into a fine mess. Believe me: The storm clouds are gathering on the horizon. It's only a matter time now before we will witness their devastation.

©Mark Alexander

6 comments:

friendlysaviour said...

Interfaith...the well-meaning weak do-gooders, opening the door to the evil-bearing religious facists who will sweep away all that is held dear.
Shame on the foolish ignorance that motivates the good intentions that promote this capitulation.
I think St. Paul would have been ashamed at priests' ignorance of the intentions of of those that follow this perverse and dangerous practise.
Surely it is the duty of priests to be knowledgeable about their religion and the dangers it faces?

Mark said...

Bld:

Surely it is the duty of priests to be knowledgeable about their religion and the dangers it faces?

It is indeed. But sadly they aren't. They are generally quite ignorant.

I always remember bringing up the subject of Islam with a local C of E priest may years ago, when I worked in the Middle East. You ought to have seen how swift his exit was! Why? Because he knew not a damn thing about it!

The Anti-Jihadist said...

The Anglican Church is sadly becoming yet another agent of dhimmitude.

Mark said...

The Anti-Jihadist:

How true are your words!

friendlysaviour said...

mark,.. hi there,
just caught the Dean of Southwark cathedral commenting on "Today" news,that he believes that "isalm is in the process of a Reforation!"
Also that Binliner was an example of the throw-back to fundamentalism that Christians and Jews had when their Reformations occurred.
He equated the Time-Period of fifteen hundred years being significant in the Christian/Jewish Reformations and the fact that islam is in it's fifteenth century.
What do they teach these morons at
University?
If he truly believes that islam can "reform" in the way that the other religions have, he can have NO understanding of the principals of islam as outlined in your valuable book which I am reading again.
I hear resonances with the attitudes of the appeasers, 65 years ago, who thought that they could see the possibilty of reform in the National Socalists, and were willing to stand back and watch as the nazis went on to "reform" Poland and the rest of their early European conquests.
It seems our representatives of Christ are willing and wanting to excuse the unremmitting nature of islamic conquest, as mere turning to the roots of islam whilst in the process of becoming "just like us."

The only Reformation islam has in mind, is OUR reformation in the likeness of slaves or converts.
A little knowledge is dangerous, and priests like this one are dangerous in the extreme, through their ignorance.

Mark said...

mark,.. hi there,

Hi, Bld!

just caught the Dean of Southwark cathedral commenting on "Today" news,that he believes that "isalm is in the process of a Reforation!"

He's talking through his pine end!

What do they teach these morons at University

Not much!

If he truly believes that islam can "reform" in the way that the other religions have, he can have NO understanding of the principals of islam as outlined in your valuable book which I am reading again.

He obviously doesn't have any understanding of Islam. The only Christian in high places who shows understanding of it is the wonderful Pope.

I hear resonances with the attitudes of the appeasers, 65 years ago, who thought that they could see the possibilty of reform in the National Socalists, and were willing to stand back and watch as the nazis went on to "reform" Poland and the rest of their early European conquests.

That's exactly what they are like.

The only Reformation islam has in mind, is OUR reformation in the likeness of slaves or converts.

Exactly!

A little knowledge is dangerous, and priests like this one are dangerous in the extreme, through their ignorance.

Can we really expect to look to priests for examples of great courage?