Friday, June 30, 2006

Latest taqiyya from Teheran--"Islam bans WMDs"

Anybody out there still worried about those irritating Iranians and their nattering nabobs of nukes? Well now, you can all relax! Some Iranian minister says that Islam bans WMDs, so no nukes for the jihadists of Iran. Golly, he said it, so it MUST be true! Now all us infidels can breath easy, right?

Iranian minister: WMD outlawed in Islam

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) -- An Iranian minister told Indonesia's vice president Tuesday that his country has no plans to develop nuclear weapons because Islamic law outlaws the development of weapons of mass destruction.

"Islamic doctrine does not allow us to produce mass destruction weapons or nuclear ones and the Iranian state is based on that principle," Zahedi told a news conference after meeting with Indonesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla.

He questioned why countries that have developed or used nuclear weapons continue to oppose Iran's nuclear research and development.

He called on developing countries to fight hand in hand against what he called "scientific apartheid."

Whoa, "scientific apartheid", now there's a soundbyte of propaganda par excellence. It's such a nifty term, plus it sounds a lot like Israel's so-called "apartheid wall", so it should really go over well with the "progressive" types and Iran's other friends in the west. Goebbels himself would be proud.

So, is this Iranian minister going to bother telling his brothers the Pakis that their nukes are a supposed "violation of Islamic principles"? Don't bet the farm on it.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Your Jizyah At Work - US Insured Gaza Power Plant

It's a classic! It turns out the US insured (yes insured) the Gaza power plant and will be responsible for rebuilding it. Don't you just love how our government works and spends your tax dollars? Our leadership is insane.

Gaza power plant hit by Israeli airstrike is insured by US agency
By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | June 29, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The Palestinian power plant bombed by Israeli forces Tuesday is insured by a US government agency, and US officials say they expect American funds to be used to pay for the damage.
Sign up for: Globe Headlines e-mail | Breaking News Alerts The destruction of the 140-megawatt reactor, the only one in the Gaza Strip, threatens to create a humanitarian disaster because the plant supplies electricity to two-thirds of Gaza's 1.3 million residents and operates pumps that provide water supplies.

But paying a claim on the plant, which was insured for $48 million, could prove problematic for the United States, which cut off funding for all infrastructure projects in the Palestinian territories after the militant group Hamas won legislative elections in January.

Administration officials said the restrictions on working with a Hamas-led government could further complicate the repair of the electric facility, which could take weeks, if not months, to fix because of the escalating violence in Gaza.

The bombing of the plant could become a lasting problem for the Bush administration, which is appealing for an end to the showdown between Israelis and Palestinians in Gaza.

Israeli warplanes hit the power plant two days after Palestinian militants attacked an Israeli Army unit, killing two soldiers and taking another one hostage. Israeli forces responded yesterday by entering the Gaza Strip for the first time since Israel's historic pullout from the territory nine months ago, bombing the plant and three bridges.

The power plant cost about $150 million and took more than five years to build.

Plans for it began in 1999, when two private investors -- the now-defunct Enron Corp. and a Palestinian-born construction mogul, Said Khoury -- laid down the blueprint for making the Palestinian territories less reliant on buying electricity from Israel.

The project faltered when violence broke out in Gaza in 2000 and when Enron collapsed into bankruptcy, but Khoury continued to push forward. His construction company's US subsidiary, Connecticut-based Morganti Group, bought out Enron's stake in the plant.

In 2002, the plant began operating, becoming the first such facility regulated by the Palestinian Energy Authority. In 2004, it reached full commercial capacity and its owners were able to purchase $48 million in ``political risk" insurance from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation , an arm of the US government that provides American businesses with financing abroad and promotes US interests in emerging markets.

The US Investment Corporation -- set up in 1971 with US taxpayer funds -- had been supportive of the project from the beginning, arranging the first meeting between investors for the plant, according to the Bloomberg news service.

Few commercial insurance companies insure such projects against political violence, but the US Investment Corporation does so to encourage development in emerging markets, according to Lawrence Spinelli, a spokesman for the Investment Corporation.

The insurance that Morganti purchased covers ``political violence," which includes ``wars, acts of terrorism, things like that," Spinelli said. To be paid for the damage, the company must file a claim, and the Investment Corporation must determine whether the claim is covered by the policy, Spinelli said.

The corporation raises its reserve funds through insurance premiums and other charges to its clients, but its funds are kept in the US Treasury and are controlled by Congress.

That could be a problem for those who want to see the power plant swiftly rebuilt.

After the election of Hamas in January, a host of congressmen introduced bills designed to freeze US assistance to the Palestinian territories to prevent any financial benefit from reaching Hamas, designated as a terrorist organization. In April, the State Department announced it would cut off all planned funding for infrastructure in Gaza and the West Bank.

But advocates for Palestinians say that the plant must be repaired, even if the US government is forced to pay for it.

``If you take out two-thirds of the power in a place like Gaza, and if this is the source of electricity that powers pumps for water, you may have a major crisis on your hand in short order," said Ed Abington , a former consultant to the Palestinian Authority

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

The Big Picture and Islam

Eminent scientist and author Stephen Hawking understands the big picture for the human species. The stark choice for humanity? Space travel or death:

Hawking says humans must go into space
Predicts increased risk of disaster that will destroy our planet

HONG KONG - The survival of the human race depends on its ability to find new homes elsewhere in the universe because there's an increasing risk that a disaster will destroy the Earth, world-renowned scientist Stephen Hawking said Tuesday.

The British astrophysicist told a news conference in Hong Kong that humans could have a permanent base on the moon in 20 years and a colony on Mars in the next 40 years.

"We won't find anywhere as nice as Earth unless we go to another star system," added Hawking, who arrived to a rock star's welcome Monday. Tickets for his lecture planned for Thursday were sold out.

He added that if humans can avoid killing themselves in the next 100 years, they should have space settlements that can continue without support from Earth. "It is important for the human race to spread out into space for the survival of the species," Hawking said. "Life on Earth is at the ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster, such as sudden global warming, nuclear war, a genetically engineered virus or other dangers we have not yet thought of."

Hawking has it exactly right. As long as all of our species resides on one speck of dust that is our planet, we will continue to be vulnerable.

What Hawking doesn't say here, and almost certainly wouldn't say, is that Islam constitutes one of the prime threats to the human enterprise, if not the main threat. The disaster Hawking mentions--nuclear war, a doomsday virus, or something else-- could all be jihad-inspired Islamic terrorist attack(s).

Even if one totally discounts the jihad (just ask your friendly neighborhood progressive to do that), can anyone honestly think that Islamic scientists are going to develop the sort of technologies we need to colonize space? C'mon! At present, the pinnacle of Islamic tech is the Iraqi IED, suicide bomb belts and Palestinian Arab 'homemade' rockets. All infidel-killing weapons, and not a peaceful device in the lot.

Islam cares little for this life--rather, it cares much more about the mythical 72 virgins in paradise.

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Islam and Human Rights don't mix

This report should come as no surprise, at least to those in the know... Malaysia, which in the memorable words of Mark Steyn, is one of the 'least worst' Muslim states on the planet, has an awful human rights record.

AFP -- Malaysia's human rights record has not improved since Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi came to power three years ago, despite his promises of reform, the country's leading rights group said on Friday.

Suaram said that while hopes had been raised with initiatives such as an investigation into the much-criticised police force, there was no political will to tackle corruption and abuse at high levels.“ This is the third year of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi's administration but his promises for democratic reform have not been translated into real substantive change,” it said in an annual report.

“Under the weight of multiple restrictive laws, there has been little substantial improvement in the fundamental rights to free speech, assembly and association.”

Suaram said that the royal commission into the police force, which heard allegations of torture of detainees, had simply fizzled out and that none of its long list of recommendations had been implemented.

“Despite the government's pledge to reform the police force, unlawful detention, use of detainees in custody, corruption and other forms of police misconduct remain extensive,” it said. “Deaths in police custody and deaths by police shootings continue,” it added. “The response by police officials has made them a laughing stock of the nation.”

Suaram highlighted the continuing misuse of the draconian Internal Security Act (ISA), which allows for indefinite detention without trial and which the government says is a crucial tool against terrorism.”

The ISA continues to be used against 'deviant' religious groups, document forgers, and threats of ISA detention have been raised against bloggers and even diesel smugglers,” it said.

The international watchdog Human Rights Watch also blasted Malaysia this week, accusing it of hypocrisy for calling for the closure of the US Guantanamo jail while holding scores of detainees without trial.

It called on Malaysia to either charge or release those held under the ISA, including alleged members of the regional terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) which has been accused of a string of attacks in Indonesia.

It's all proof positive that Islam and Human Rights don't mix, and never will, no matter how well intended the alleged 'moderates' and other supposed reformers are. Islam is a rotten, twisted belief system that perverts and eventually destroys all that it touches. Malaysian maladies are but symptoms of this undeniable truth.

But don't expect the usual Human Rights chowderheads in Dar-al-Harb to pay much notice of Malaysia's massive hypocrisy. They're way too busy slamming the evil Bushitler and holding endless press conferences on Guantanamo.

Monday, June 26, 2006


Sunday, June 25, 2006

Despair and Hope

Victor David Hanson's latest take on the War against the Global Jihad Machine is worth a look:

Despair and Hope
The short and long wars against radical Islam
by Victor Davis Hanson
National Review Online

In the short-term, the ongoing war with Islamic fascists from Afghanistan to Iraq , and in peripheral areas from Canada and Manhattan to Madrid , Bali, and London , seems surreal.

Not to mention frustrating: almost every day the press highlights another furious outburst from some entertainers or intellectuals who are just enough on the fringes of American popular culture to warrant momentary coverage of their lunacy. Neil Young is worried about the reception of his new album? He hypes George Bush’s malignancies. The Dixie Chicks and Madonna are bothered about being pegged abroad as part of George Bush’s empire? Presto, they call Iraq the real problem. The dropout Sean Penn can’t quite shake his off-screen image of Jeff Spicoli? He seeks acceptance from the Western Left as a serious critic of U.S. Middle-Eastern policy.

The largest American aid program since the Marshall Plan has become the receptacle for all the conflicting personal frustrations, unhappiness, and thwarted idealism of Western elites, a sort of scapegoat or totem through which the ennui and angst of contemporary sensitive man can be momentarily excised.

The terrorists in Iraq know this and thus trust that our press corps will harp on the last minutes, rather than the last four years, of the wretched life of the mass-murdering al Zarqawi — did he receive proper medical attention? Was he roughed up by us? Did he die immediately or suffer?

Indeed, the more our own troops are tortured and exploded, the more our own media will rush to judgment on Haditha to assure the world, before an inquiry has even finished, that the U.S. Marine Corps murdered innocents. The more non-uniformed Islamists behead civilians and torture innocents, the more international “rights” organizations will accuse the United States of humanitarian violations in Guantanamo Bay — at least up until the point of calling for the return of such killers to their native countries.

Read the rest here.

Saturday, June 24, 2006

The Lord and Israel or ''allah'' and Palestine

This was sent to me recently by a guest commentator named Leon. I am posting it exactly as I received it.

These days the whole world is focused on the holy land! But why do Muslims refer to it as Palestine and Jews and Christians refer to it as Israel? Well we need to go far back in history to find out what it was originally called. Before Moses (around 1500bc) the region of the holy land was ruled by many different people groups each occupying a small area of land -- the Hittites, Canaanites, Philistines, Jebusites and other tribal peoples. Centuries before Moses - God promised the holy land to a man called Abraham who is the father of the Jews, then at the time of Moses the Lord God fulfilled His promise by bringing His chosen people out of Egypt into their promised land which the Lord God calls Israel. In the Bible the land that God promised the Jews is always called Israel the word Palestine is never mentioned, so for over 1000 years before Christ it's called Israel! and in many places in the Holy Bible God promised that land to the Jews- Gen 15:18-21, Psalm 105:6-21, Deut 30:3, Jer 30:3 etc. Actually the size of Israel today is much smaller than what God gave them. As a matter of fact the Muslims control more than 99% of the land in the middle east with much of it having oil, whereas the Jews and the nation of Israel occupies less than 1% of the middle east land mass and it's without oil, but even so for religious motives the Muslims want to take it.

The question is if God calls the land Israel where does the name Palestine come from? In the second century the Jews revolted against the Romans, the Romans crushed the rebellion and sold many of the Jews into slavery and re-named Israel-Syria-Palestinia, a few hundred years later Muslims conquered the region and then it became known as Palestine. For centuries the holy land was controlled by the Muslims it was basically desert with just a few villages here and there with a small population of Jews, Christians, and Muslims. In the late 1800's and early 1900's thousands of Jews from all over the world started going back to Palestine, (The Biblical prophecy is that in the last days the Lord God of Israel would bring back all the scattered Jews from around the world back to their promised land) then after world war 2 after suffering the holocaust the Jews of Europe started emigrating to holy land which was under British control after world war 1, so then basically what happened was the Jews were given a small area of land which was re named Israel. The United Nations and the British tried to create two countries Israel for the Jews and Muslims from the trans-Jordan region which at that time included the holy land and modern day Jordan (70% of the population of Jordan today call themselves ‘Palestinians’), but for Muslims to give any land to any non-Muslims would be against their religion , so the Muslims chose war in 1948 and they lost, again in 1967 and 1973 Muslim nations tried to conquer the nation of Israel, they failed! Why? because the Lord God of Israel defends Israel. But the world was left with this Palestinian refugee problem (even though they were given the land of Jordan in 1948)! But can there be peace in the middle east?

On the day that arafat signed the agreement on the white house lawn he made an address to Palestinian Muslims on Jordan TV in which he said -- '' since we cannot defeat Israel in war we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can and establish a sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel''. Does this sound like a man who wants peace?

In the year 628 Mohammed (the founder of Islam) made a 'peace treaty' with the kuraish tribe he did this with the intentions of attacking at a more opportune time, 2 years later he attacked and slaughtered them. This agreement became known as the '' truce of hudaybiyyah'' and this truce became a model in Islamic law for all agreements with non Muslims. The secular world doesn’t realise that having negotiations and signing peace treaties with Muslims is an absolute waste of time because Muslims believe the Koran to be the holy book of their god and prophet , and he says “Allah is not bound by any contract or treaty with non-Muslims, nor is His Apostle.” - Qur’an 9:3

The following extracts are the words of the late yasser arafat speaking in a Johannesburg mosque (Six days after signing the peace accord) -- '' in the name of allah…...believe me there is a lot to be done. The Jihad will continue…... And I have to speak frankly, I cant do it alone without the support the of the Islamic nation…... you have to come and fight and to start the Jihad.….. I am not considering it more than the agreement signed between our prophet mohammed and the kuraish tribe -- a dispicable truce''…. We are in need of you as muslims, as warriors of Jihad. Arafat's intentions were clear –- mohammed made a false peace with the kuraish tribe so to arafat is insincere about peace with Israel, and by sound of his speech he's main motivation was the spread of the Islamic religion, but what can you expect from a man who once said ‘’I am prepared to kill for my cause, shall I not lie for it!’’

The most puzzling of all is that western nations are not supporting Israel in their war against terrorism but are constantly trying to please Islamic nations by condemning Israel for defending itself! Well maybe that's because there's less than 25 million Jews in the world but there's over 1.4 billion Muslims.

Most people don't realise that what the holy Bible calls Armageddon is actually a region in Israel! According to Biblical prophecy all the evil forces of the world (remember Israel is surrounded by Islamic nations)will eventually gather against Israel to try destroy the nation Israel and the city of Jerusalem which God gave to the Jews, but it's then that our Lord Jesus Christ comes and saves Israel and His chosen people and destroys the forces of darkness. So make sure your with The Lord on that day for the King of the Jews says -- '' Whoever is not with Me is against Me ''. -- Matthew 12:30

Friday, June 23, 2006

IG Report on DHS' Appalling Catch and Release Statistics

I was reading the Minuteman site tonight and they had posted the Inspector General's 'Detention and Removal of Illegal Aliens' report. It was discretely released with no press release on a Friday.

You can read the PDF here. I am amazed no mainstream media has reported the shocking facts in this report. Catch and release is still HUGE. It's a disturbing document and a shame it has received very little coverage.

Thursday, June 22, 2006

The Power of Lies--the Bernama Brigade

Bernama is the official Malaysian Government "information service". The following story is taken verbatim from their website's line commentary is necessary on this one. Read it and judge its merits, or lack thereof, for yourself:

American Media Asked To Dupe People, Destroy Islam, Says Expert

KUALA LUMPUR, June 13 (Bernama) — The American media is controlled by certain groups which plan to destroy the Islamic world, according to an American media expert.

Michael Collins Piper said a group of family and financial interests people in the United States were using the media to control government policies. “They will not be satisfied because Islam is the last religion standing in the way of the new world order,” he added.

Piper is the author of “The Final Judgment”, a book which provides evidence in support of the theory that former US President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in a combined Mossad/CIA operation.

He said all the major broadcasting networks, newspapers and magazines were controlled by tightly-networked families and financial interests people who had a global network and worked for the Bush administration.

Piper, who is also founder of the American Free Press website and The Barnes Review, said the war on terror was actually a war against Islam.

He said he wanted to be the “bridge-builder”, to show that not all Americans supported the Jewish-controlled Bush administration policy. He said the media in the US did not report true stories. For instance, the story of William Rodriguez, a former maintenance worker at the World Trade Centre in Manhattan, as it would open up a whole new perspective of the Sept 11 terror attack on the US in 2001.

During the press conference, Piper, a Puerto Rico-born, said the victims’ families were now forcing the government to conduct fresh investigations to find out the real truth of the tragedy.

On the fateful day, Piper said Rodriguez was talking to his supervisor when he heard a huge explosion from below the building believed to be from the mechanical room
where pumps, generators and air-conditioners were located.

“It was so powerful that the walls fell on us. Then, suddenly within minutes, another bang on top of the tower, the one where the plane crashed into the WTC, but it sounded totally different. “Two separate events, one at the basement and one on the top. I’ve been working there for 20 years, I know the difference between what comes from the bottom and the top,” he had said.

He said the two explosions showed there was an initiated plan to create what he believed a tragedy that was synchronised.

“I believe they had a plan to bring the building down at the same time the plane crashed into the tower. They wanted to weaken the base for that to happen.”

In the incident, Rodriguez, who had the master key to the North Tower staircases, unlocked the doors and led fire-fighters up the stairwell, aiding in the evacuation of hundreds of people who might have otherwise perished.


Wednesday, June 21, 2006

The Parasitic FIfth Column Works the Jizya and the Taqiyya

Can you spot the parasites living off the infidels? Can you identify the jizya? What about the taqiyya? It just never stops.

Muslims give big to suspects' families
Richard Kerbaj
June 21, 2006
A HARDLINE Islamic organisation has helped raise thousands of dollars for the families of Melbourne's alleged terror suspects during a special fundraising event.
More than 300 people, including some family members of the 13 terrorism accused, attended a dinner party held by the fundamentalist Islamic and Information Services Network of Australasia last month, where more than $50,000 was raised through donations and auctions.

The accused men are among 22 terror suspects who were arrested during the nation's biggest joint police and ASIO counter-terrorism raids in Sydney and Melbourne between November and April.

The fundraising comes despite revelations the families of the alleged terror cell members from both states were collectively already receiving more than an estimated $1 million a year in taxpayer-funded Centrelink benefits and legal aid.

Under Centrelink rules, the accused men's families are entitled to an increase in their welfare payments by as much as $1700 a year.

Among the alleged terror cell members who have been charged with being members of a terrorist organisation is Abdul Nacer Benbrika.

Mr Benbrika is accused of being the spiritual leader of the young radical Muslims. His wife and seven children will receive almost $50,000 in welfare benefits while he remains behind bars awaiting trial.

Despite the additional funds, the fundraising event at Aurora Receptions in Melbourne's north last month was a success.

It is understood that pictures of the men, who are held at the maximum security Acacia unit in Barwon Prison, southeast of Melbourne, were projected on to a large screen during the function.

The emotional multimedia presentation was played between a series of community-led speeches proclaiming the men's innocence and was instrumental in the appeal's success.

President of the Melbourne-based IISNA Sheik Abu Hamza refused to discuss the details of the fundraising event.

But The Australian understands that money will be disbursed among the families, with each receiving a weekly payment of $250.

The president of the moderate Islamic Council of Victoria, Malcolm Thomas, gave a keynote speech at the function about the importance of helping community members in need. But this week he said he did not represent ICV at the event and expressed personal views, calling on the audience to support Muslims and non-Muslims in the community.

"My view was that we all have responsibility to our community, to individuals, irrespective of what they've done," Mr Thomas said.

"We have responsibilities as a community to other people."

During his speech, he criticised a terror suspect's relatives who attacked the media outside Melbourne Magistrates Court in November.

Mr Thomas said the attacks were "un-Islamic" and "cost the Muslim community a lot of social capital".

"Some were uncomfortable with what I said and some understood what I was saying," said Mr Thomas, who did not donate any money during the fundraiser.


Playing the Spoiler on Immigration
House Republicans want to barnstorm the country to pick apart the moderate Senate plan that Bush supports.

BY AUTHORAnalysis: Why Immigration Reform May Die

Posted Tuesday, Jun. 20, 2006

Getting Republicans together has been the major stumbling block on immigration reform. Most GOP senators supported President Bush's plan - LIAR, it was a minority of GOP Senators, which would strengthen border security, create a guest worker program and offer a path to citizenship for the some 10 million illegals already in this country. On the other side are most House Republicans, who want border security only and don't want to hear about anything that they regard as "amnesty" until later, if ever. Today House Republicans stunned their Senate colleagues by announcing that they intend to hold public hearings around the country this August to highlight what they see as the bad parts of the Senate version of immigration reform. It's a highly unusual road show designed to get the Senate, which passed a plan to Bush's liking earlier this spring, closer to their more hardline position. But a more subtle game may be afoot among Republicans, designed to strengthen the compromise plan of Rep. Mike Pence — first reported on — that leans in the direction of the hard-line House; it would crank up border security, have a modest guest worker program and insist that illegals leave the country before reapplying for citizenship. tracked down two of the key players in this legislative faceoff and asked about the new development. In the Speaker's lobby off the House floor today, House Majority Leader John Boehner of Ohio told the move was not designed to scuttle immigration reform this year: Are you going in for the kill on immigration?

Boehner: No.... We're going to highlight some of those provisions in the Senate bill to make sure people know what the Senate bill really does. Which parts?

Boehner: In-state tuition for illegal aliens. Welfare benefits for people who are here illegally. I don't know what all the provisions are, but there's some stuff in there that I don't think folks I know would agree with. You're going in for the kill.

Boehner: No. Understand something here. I believe that we need to pass a good bill.

Translation: The Senate bill has to come a lot closer to what we want. (Thank you Massimo for that thought to impregnate my evil conservative brain.) Meanwhile, in the basement of the Capitol, Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana spoke with before holding the latest in a series of meetings with Senate hardliner Jon Kyl of Arizona, a kindred spirit to the House Republicans.

(Is Pence a wolf in sheep's clothing? I think so.) What does the [road show] mean for immigration reform?

Pence Taking time this summer to expose the amnesty elements of the Senate bill would be very useful. I think it could help clear the way for a no-amnesty compromise that would be able to pass the House and Senate. Of the sort you have proposed?

Pence I think there would be a way we could secure the border, pass tough employer sanctions and implement a guest worker program without amnesty. Is there a danger that this just leads to blockage and nothing gets done? What are the election year risks?

Pence The worst thing we could do would be to pass the Senate amnesty bill and send it to the President's desk. Are the Senators trying to jump on your bill as a way out of the Boehner-Hastert attack?

Pence I've been having meetings here since broke this story. I've been meeting with a number of members of the Senate. This meeting is in no way a response to today's developments.

For their part, several Senate GOP staffers spoke with agreed that a public airing of the more moderate provisions in the Senate bill could doom their measure. Instead of enjoying the Republican chaos, however, Democrats were left scrambling to catch up. Sen. Harry Reid today called on President Bush to push those conservative House Republicans to begin a House-Senate conference immediately. (Can you believe Bush is ALLIED with Reid? The thought is grotesque.) But with his ratings low, and House Republicans digging in deeper, Bush may be little more than a spectator when it comes to this summer's immigration caravan.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

More Islam Will Surely Fix The Problem With Islam

Of course, if everyone is miserable and disgruntled with their small cut of the jizya that trickles down from their parasitic governments, it's time for more Islam, more 'pure' 7th century Islam. The good stuff. There is that old sage advice "quit digging when you discover you are in a hole"; never caught on in the Muhammedan's world. We infidels look on in disbelief (or used to disbelieve, now just disgusted) when Muslims voted for a strict 'pure' 7th century lifestyle, like Hamas, like Muslim Brotherhood, and so many other 'pure Islam' parties who are really, really popular. Like the idea that instituting regressive and oppressive barbarian practices and laws will solve their problem. Well, hey it may get the infidels to shovel more jizya as they try to keep the barbarians from the gate. Seems to work for Hamas, Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Malaysia, and so many more parasitic states. Suck the infidels dry. They deserve it. Sounds like a good plan to me. Bankrupt the infidels with demands for jizya, steal as much as possible, immigrate to the infidel's lands and establish enclaves dominated solely by Muslims, work the PC/MC racket in the infidel institutions - piece of cake, lots of sympathizers to help. Just eat the infidels from within and without. Pretty good plan.

Meanwhile, I feel like going out and busting up some infidel artifacts. How about you? Egypt has a problem and will need MORE JIZYA to stop it. Right?

Statue attack fuels fears of an Islamist Egypt
By Harry de Quetteville in Cairo, The Telegraph
(Filed: 18/06/2006)

A religiously motivated attack on statues at a museum in Cairo has sparked outcry in Egypt and fuelled fears that the country is veering towards an Islamic state.

The attack on three artworks, by a black-clad and veiled woman screaming, "Infidels, infidels!" followed a fatwa issued by the Grand Mufti of Cairo, Ali Gomaa, which banned all decorative statues of living beings.

Possible targets in future: Tutankhamen and Amenhotep

It led to furious criticism of the mufti from Egyptian liberals. In a televised debate with the mufti after the attack, one poet raged that "the prevalent religious discourse in the country encourages terror".

Although the ancient treasures of Egypt have been protected under Islam so far, an increasing extremism in the country could make statues such as the quartzite head of Nefertiti, the colossus of Amenhotep, and the golden death mask of Tutankhamen possible targets in future.

At the scene of the attack, in the villa and museum of the Egyptian sculptor, Hassan Heshmat, guards said they had been woken in the middle of the night by the woman's shouts and the sounds of destruction.

"It was a fully covered, religious woman," said Raisa Intesar, who looks after both the museum and Mr Heshmat, who is now 86. "She had jumped over the wall. We rushed out to stop her but by the time we had overpowered her, she had destroyed three statues."

The damaged works included Motherhood, a piece featuring three delicately carved heads, all of which had been snapped off. Also damaged was a smaller piece, The Victory Leap, Heshmat's tribute to Egyptian troops in the 1973 Yom Kippur war.

But the patriotic sentiment of the work was lost on the attacker, who was intent on following a religious imperative. "She had been listening to the mufti, and was following his orders," Ms Intesar said.

In Islam, representations of the human form and potential idolatry are particularly sensitive topics and helped to fuel the riots over the depiction of the Prophet earlier this year.

So, in Egypt, which has become markedly more conservative in recent years, artists such as Mr Heshmat now find that national pride is losing out to religious fervour.

The attack exemplifies the clash of secular and religious societies in Egypt where, on the streets of Cairo, beauties in low-cut tops mingle with veiled women who walk behind their husbands.

"We are seeing an increase of conservative, Islamist feeling," said Nabil Abdel Fatah, from the Al Ahram centre for Political and Strategic studies in Cairo.

"The Islamisation of Egyptian society is happening from the bottom up, and now it has reached the middle classes - the doctors, the lawyers.

"Over the next few years political Islam will grow and grow," he added. "The duality between secular and religious is very dangerous and will lead to a very serious conflict in Egyptian society.

We are already seeing terror attacks. And we will see new radical groups who will want to change the state in the most basic way - by suicide bombs and assassination."

Comfortably installed in the cafe at the top of Egypt's parliament building, 72-year-old Sheikh Said Askar smiled benignly at such ideas.

Sheikh Askar is one of 88 members of parliament for the Muslim Brotherhood, whose offshoots include Hamas, now in power in the Palestinian territories, and which seeks to impose Sharia law throughout Egypt.

Although he is also a long-serving scholar at Cairo's al Azhar mosque, from where the mufti issued his fatwa on statues, he said the Brotherhood will use its growing voice in parliament - not bombs - to effect change. "I want to see Egypt become an Islamic state," he said. "We are near to that."

As little as a year ago, such an idea would have been fanciful. Sheikh Askar was locked up ahead of last autumn's parliamentary elections, from which the Brotherhood was banned.

Running as independents, and despite widespread government interference, its members markedly exceeded expectations by winning enough seats to become the main opposition. Had it not been so restricted, some say, it could have won.

"I understand that an Islamic Egypt scares the West," said Sheikh Askar. "But the secular government has failed the people. Now our group will spread the glory of Islam."

With 'friends' like Pakistan, who needs enemies?

Asia Times Online recently ran this piece about what that alleged US ally in south Asia has been up to lately--namely stoking up support yet again for the Global Jihad:

This correspondent entered one of the shops (in Pakistan), where an action movie with noisy background songs was playing. The scene showed some Middle Eastern-looking youths with long beards surrounding a convoy and firing bullets and rockets.

"What are you watching?" "Jihad," replied one of the kids. "What?" (The reply was not immediately comprehensible.) "Jihad, jihad. Do not you understand 'jihad'?" asked the shopkeeper incredulously.

No word could better sum up the situation in this volatile area than "jihad".

The movie these Pakistani future jihadists were watching is shown above. Read the rest of this article here.

Monday, June 19, 2006

The Power of Lies

Another gem of truth about our enemies in the "Islamic Jihadist Republic of Palestine" from StrategyPage:

...Fatah, while out of power, is not out of ideas. Fatah has convinced most of the Hamas leadership to go along with a deal where would say it believes Israel has a right to exist. But then, as Fatah has done for over a decade, Hamas could continue to preach to its core supporters the need to destroy Israel. Fatah has shown that if you deny the lie loudly and often enough in English, the Western aid donors will ignore what is being said in Arabic. Until recently, Hamas insisted on saying the same thing in English and Arabic. Fatah has convinced them that this is foolish and counterproductive. Lying works much better.

Saturday, June 17, 2006

Bush Gives Us A History Lesson in 2004

"About 15 years before the Civil War, much of the
American West was northern Mexico," Bush says in the
video. "The people who lived there weren't called
Latinos or Hispanics. They were Mexican citizens,
until all that land became part of the United States.

"After that, many of them were treated as foreigners
in their own land," Bush adds."

Got that America? This is from Bush's propaganda video he produced in 2004 for the Latin voter.

Liberty Post has the video.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Who is Kofi kidding?

Shabbat Shalom to all our Jewish readers. Appropriately enough, I found an article today about Israel and the international double standard (not to mention daily rocket attacks from Gaza) that this embattled democracy must endure on a daily basis. This article by Gary Bauer is about the recent "beach massacre":

United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan is once again laying the blame for unrest in the Middle East at the feet of Israel after that nation responded to a series of rocket attacks from the Gaza Strip. During the Israeli retaliation, seven members of an Arab family vacationing on a Gaza beach were killed, and Annan was quick to condemn Israel, even though there was no confirmation of Israeli responsibility for their deaths.

Here is the text of his statement: “The Secretary-General is deeply disturbed at the killing of civilians, including women and children, on a beach in Gaza earlier today, reportedly by Israeli forces, and calls for a full investigation. He extends his condolences to the bereaved families of the victims. “The Secretary-General reminds all concerned of their obligations under international humanitarian law to avoid placing civilians in danger, while urging the utmost restraint to avoid further escalation and bloodshed.”

This statement is a total joke, but, unfortunately, Kofi’s not kidding. Surely, the secretary-general does not expect terrorists to abide by “international humanitarian law,” so that comment can only be directed at the Jewish state. Once again, there is zero mention of the context in which this tragedy occurred, and, once again, Israel is urged to show “the utmost restraint to avoid further escalation and bloodshed.” Where is the concern for Jewish women and children who are being subjected to random barrages of rockets launched by Muslim terrorists from Gaza ? Where are his condolences for the Israeli victims of Palestinian/Islamic terrorism?

Last month, American Daniel Wultz, a 16 year-old high school student from Florida, died of injuries he sustained in a Tel Aviv homicide bombing while visiting Israel with his family during Passover. Islamic Jihad proudly took credit for this attack, yet Israel is urged to “avoid further escalation and bloodshed.” The double standard is disgusting. No sovereign state would hesitate to respond to such barbarism, but Israel is forced to endure repeated calls to “exercise restraint” and to “stop the cycle of violence.” By the way, the Israeli government is pledging a thorough investigation, but Palestinian officials reportedly are not cooperating. As is often the case, the truth may not be so useful in the propaganda war against Israel. Nevertheless, the evidence now strongly suggests that this tragedy was the result of a straying rocket from some Muslim Palestinian terrorist group aimed at Israel!

Thursday, June 15, 2006

The West’s problems with Islam exacerbated by Bush’s determination not to identify the enemy!

9/11, a day that will go down in history as a ‘day of infamy’, should have marked a turning point in our dealing with the Islamic world. Alas, no such ‘turning point’ came about.

Instead, the President of the US, George W Bush, insisted that the US was not at war with the Islamic world. I dare say it was true – to a point. What he failed to say was its corollary: namely, that the Islamic world was at war with America, and by extension, the West!

That this was so should have been made clear to all Americans, and to all Westerners alike. It wasn’t. The result of this is that we now have fuzzy thinking on the war we are engaged in, fuzzy thinking on the problems we face, fuzzy thinking on the growth of Islam in the West, fuzzy thinking on how to tackle our enemy: Islam!

Make no mistake about it: Islam is our enemy. Islam represents all that is abhorrent to the West: coercion, lack of religious freedom, totalitarianism, and much else besides. But, as the West was built up on largely Christian principles, it is also the negation of the notion that Jesus Christ is man’s Saviour, man’s Redeemer. They say that Jesus Christ was not the Son of God; we say that He was! The West, as a civilization, has been built up on that notion.

No problem, you say. Let them believe what they will. Wrong! You are wrong, so wrong, to take this viewpoint.

Muslims have principles. Indeed, it may be said that they have very strong principles. And they fight for them. How many of YOU have principles that you will fight for? It would appear that Westerners have few principles they are willing to fight for; indeed, many Westerners are not sure what their principles are! And therein lies one of the major problems we face today: not knowing what the West stands for; and, by extension, not knowing what we must fight for.

Yes, all right, we have some vague notions of freedom and democracy. But let’s face it, they are just that: vague notions! How many people truly understand what freedom is, still less what democracy entails? Do we really understand both concepts? Freedom is not just being able to go on your favourite foreign holiday when you please; democracy isn’t just about voting for this handsome guy, or that one. No! It’s about more than that. Much more!

How is the West going to deal with the onslaught of Islam when Westerners don’t even know what they should believe in? In years gone by, Westerners knew exactly what they should believe in: in Judeo-Christian principles. But as churches have emptied, many people now know sweet little about Judeo-Christian principles, and care still less about them.

It may be said, in no uncertain terms I have to say, that we ignore our Judeo-Christian heritage at our own peril! Islam is knocking on our door; in fact, we have already let it in. And the religion is growing apace in the West; and make no mistake about it: it is DIAMETRICALLY-OPPOSED to EVERYTHING we stand for; and it is only biding its time to take us over. The sickness of out time is that ordinary folk have no understanding of what is going on!

It is my belief that George W Bush must shoulder a lot of the blame for this ignorance. For, in stubbornly refusing to apportion blame for the atrocities of 9/11 on Muslims, he has also brought confusion into the minds of many Westerners. Westerners, as a result, have little understanding of what motivates Muslims. To be fed the nonsense that Muslims are our friends is a lie. A damn lie! And Bush, unless he is stupid, knows that very well. Islam is our enemy. It has to be, for it seeks to destroy us.

Make no mistake about it: Islam is waiting in the wings; it is just ready to take us over. Do you think that Muslims don’t realize and understand that Westerners have little stomach for a fight? Have none of it! They perceive YOU as WEAK! Really weak! After all, look what we are allowing them to get away with!

Only this week, it has come to our attention that our bankers are allowing the ideas of Shari’ah banking to be put in place here in the West. Now, in the United Kingdom, Shari’ah banking is to be made available to Muslims and Muslimahs across the United Kingdom, on every high street. Imagine the uproar in the UK in the 1940s with headlines such as Nazi banking to be made available to Nazis by all high street banks across the United Kingdom! It would have been totally unacceptable to people then; and it should be totally unacceptable to people now, too.

In the States, shrines to Islam, our enemy, are to be built by the US Marines. Just how stupid and naïve is that? How many shrines to Christianity are there in Saudi Arabia? We are giving these people an importance above their station!

A war – and George W Bush tells us we are at war – has to be fought from a position of strength. Furthermore, for a war to be successful, it has to be fought in the right atmosphere. The enemy has to be - yes, wait for it – demonized! I make no apologies for the use of that word. We are either at war with an enemy, or we are not! It’s as simple and straightforward as that!

No war in history has been fought like this ridiculous war! We are trying to fight a war without demonizing the enemy. It cannot be done! Either we are at war, or we are not. To say that we are at war with some vague notion of terrorists is nothing less than absurd. Terrorism equates to the Jihad. Indeed, the Jihad is terrorism unadulterated. The Jihad is nothing more and nothing less than terrorism used for the furtherance of the cause of Islam. It is used to Islamize your country and mine. Make no mistake about that!

I am reading a very good book at the moment entitled Defying Hitler. In it, the author , Sebastian Haffner, talks about how the enemy was demonized during the Great War. He talks about France’s “lust for revenge”, England’s “commercial envy”, and Russia’s “barbarism”. That’s how to do it, folks! You cannot win a war when everything has been sanitized. Everything, today, must be‘sanitized’! No war has ever been so won! No war will ever be so won! Either we are at war; or we are not. It’s as simple as that! If we are at war, then we have to demonize the enemy.

President Bush, the day after 9/11, came on TV, almost embracing the Qur’an, stating that the US was not at war with the Islamic world. What he should have stated was that the Islamic world was at war with America and the West. And it still is. Indeed, the war has been intensified. Had he done this, we wouldn’t today be seeing the growth of Islamic banking in the West, the building of shrines to Islam in the US Marines, and we wouldn’t be in such a mess with Islam in general. President Bush! You have failed! You have failed miserably! You’ve had your chance, and you’ve blown it. Move over, Sir! Let someone else try and clear up your mess!

©Mark Alexander

Dennis Miller's Take on Israel

For those of you out there who don't know, Dennis Miller is a comedian who has a show called Dennis Miller Live on HBO. He is not Jewish.

In 2003, he had the following pithy commentary to say about Israel. Have a look and enjoy! (Hat tip European Kafir):

A brief overview of the situation is always valuable, so as a service to all Americans who still don't get it, I now offer you the story of the Middle East in just a few paragraphs, which is all you really need.

Here we go: The Palestinians want their own country. There's just one thing about that: There are no Palestinians. It's a made up word.

Israel was called Palestine for two thousand years. Like "Wiccan," "Palestinian" sounds ancient but is really a modern invention. Before the Israelis won the land in the 1967 war, Gaza was owned by Egypt, the West Bank was owned by Jordan, and there were no "Palestinians."

As soon as the Jews took over and started growing oranges as big as basketballs, what do you know, say hello to the "Palestinians," weeping for their deep bond with their lost "land" and "nation." So for the sake of honesty, let's not use the word "Palestinian"anymore to describe these delightful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths, until someone points out they're being taped.

Instead, let's call them what they are: "Other Arabs Who Can't Accomplish Anything In Life And Would Rather Wrap Themselves In The Seductive Melodrama Of Eternal Struggle And Death." I know that's a bit unwieldy to expect to see on CNN. How about this, then: "Adjacent Jew-Haters."

Okay, so the Adjacent Jew-Haters want their own country. Oops, just one more thing. No, they don't. They could've had their own country any time in the last thirty years, especially two years ago at Camp David, but if you have your own country, you have to have traffic lights and garbage trucks and Chambers of Commerce, and, worse, you actually have to figure out some way to make a living. That's no fun.

No, they want what all the other Jew-Haters in the region want: Israel. They also want a big pile of dead Jews, of course --that's where the real fun is -- but mostly they want Israel. Why? For one thing, trying to destroy Israel - or "The Zionist Entity"as their textbooks call it --for the last fifty years has allowed the rulers of Arab countries to divert the attention of their own people away from the fact that they're the blue-ribbon most illiterate, poorest, and tribally backward on God's Earth, and if you've ever been around God's Earth . . . you know that's really saying something.

It makes me roll my eyes every time one of our pundits waxes poetic about the great history and culture of the Muslim Middle East. Unless I'm missing something, the Arabs haven't given anything to the world since Algebra, and, by the way, thanks a hell of a lot for that one.

Chew this around & spit it out: 500 million Arabs; 5 million Jews. Think of all the Arab countries as a football field, and Israel as a pack of matches sitting in the middle of it. And now these same folks swear that, if Israel gives them half of that pack of matches, everyone will be pals. Really? Wow, what neat news.

Hey, but what about the string of wars to obliterate the tiny country and the constant din of rabid blood oaths to drive every Jew into the sea? Oh, that? We were just kidding.

My friend Kevin Rooney made a gorgeous point the other day: Just reverse the numbers. Imagine 500 million Jews and 5 million Arabs. I was stunned at the simple brilliance of it. Can anyone picture the Jews strapping belts of razor blades and dynamite to themselves? Of course not. Or marshaling every fiber and force at their disposal for generations to drive a tiny Arab State into the sea? Nonsense. Or dancing for joy at the murder of innocents? Impossible. Or spreading and believing horrible lies about the Arabs baking their bread with the blood of children? Disgusting.

No, as you know, left to themselves in a world of peace, the worst Jews would ever do to people is debate them to death.

Mr. Bush, God bless him, is walking a tightrope. I understand that,with vital operations in Iraq and others, it's in our interest, as Americans, to try to stabilize our Arab allies as much as possible, and, after all, that can't be much harder than stabilizing a roomful of super models who've just had their drugs taken away.

However, in any big-picture strategy, there's always a danger of losing moral weight. We've already lost some. After September 11th, our president told us and the world he was going to root out all terrorists and the countries that supported them. Beautiful.

Then the Israelis, after months and months of having the equivalent of an Oklahoma City every week (and then every day), start to do the same thing we did, and we tell them to show restraint.

If America were being attacked with an Oklahoma City every day,we would all very shortly be screaming for the administration to just be done with it and kill everything south of the Mediterranean and east of the Jordan.

Please feel free to pass this along to your friends. Walk in peace! Be Happy! Have a wonderful life.

UPDATE: This pithy essay is actually by a pundit named Larry Miller and is part of a larger eidtorial that was written for The Daily Standard on 22 April 2002.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

The Camp Pendleton Eight

Michelle Malkin has a write up about the treatment our Marines who are accused of kiling 'innocent' Iraqis are being treated. It is unbelievable. They are kept in shackles IN THEIR CELLS 23 hours a day. Compare that to the Gitmo terrorists with their special halal meals, library, recreational benefits and kidglove treatment. Something is very wrong when terrorists are swooned over and Marines, accused but not convicted, are treated like dirt.

By Michelle Malkin · June 14, 2006 10:40 AM

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Real Liberalism

I began writing this as a comment to my post from earlier today, but as it got longer, I decided to make a post out of it.

Real liberalism, classic liberalism as enshrined in the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, is what that Malaysian cleric was talking about when he referred to 'liberalism' and other 'enemies of Islam'. 'Liberalism' and 'pluralism' is just another way of saying 'freedom'. Make no mistake, Freedom is always going to be seen as threat to the prison that is the 'Islamic lifestyle', at least as far as the wardens of the Islamic prison--the clerics--are concerned. Freedom threatens Islam merely by existing.

I am a firm believer in the values of the Enlightenment, and hence I am a classic liberal. Until someone comes up with something better (and it aint Islam), I am convinced that Enlightenment Values are the best means of governing ourselves, society, and the world.

Today's self-proclaimed 'liberals' of the left have little to anything in common with the values of Jefferson, Adams or any of the other Founding Fathers.

Real liberals fight all forms of tyranny, including and especially Islam.

"Moderate" Malaysia Update

Some senior blowhard cleric here in Malaysia (pictured on the left) has dared to utter the truth, namely that "liberalism" and "pluralism" are enemies of Islam.

Mufti: Beware of pluralism and liberalism
IPOH: Elements of liberalism and pluralism have crept into the thinking of some so-called Muslim intellectuals, and this could affect the Muslim lifestyle, said Perak Mufti Datuk Harussani Zakaria.

He said discussions on polygamy, the faraidh system, revision of the Quran, setting up of an Inter-Faith Commission and abolishment of Article 121 (1A) of the Federal Constitution, were getting louder as more Malaysians were embracing liberalism and pluralism.

“If left unchecked, liberalism and pluralism will be difficult to control,” he said in his keynote speech Purifying Islam from Liberalism and Pluralism at the Ulama Convention 2006 here yesterday.

Harussani said Muslims, whether policymakers or ordinary people, should know that liberalism and pluralism were alien to the fundamentals of Islam.

“The intellectuals and leaders must be aware of the threats to Islam posed by these elements,” he added. He proposed that Islamic countries set up a body to monitor the influence of Western thinking and culture.

In his speech, Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali urged Muslims to accord high respect to religious institutions and the ulama of the country. “Without the respect, we fear certain quarters will take advantage to deride Islam as the nation's official religion.”

Experts on the issues, who included Assoc Prof Dr Anis Malik Toha of the Islamic International University and Adnin Armas of the Institute for the Study of Islamic Thought and Civilisation, are due to present working papers at the two-day convention.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Good Riddance

Friday, June 09, 2006

The Church of England in terminal decline

Church pews are empty. Church leaders are embroiled in endless internal battles about issues which are controversial at best, and unresolvable at worst. Furthermore, the Archbishop of Canterbury goes around the world apologizing for the hymns sung in church services, and now, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, comes out with advice about the future coronation of Prince Charles, stating that the coronation service should be multi-culti and inclusive of other faiths. The Church of England, the keystone of the British establishment, is under attack from within as well as from without.

Each organization has a raison d’être. The raison d’être of a commercial organization is profit. The raison d’être of a charitable organization is the amount of money it can collect for the needy cause it represents. The raison d’être of the Church is to fill the pews and evangelize – to bring the Gospel to all they possibly can, and to point out the errant ways of the fallen, and the benighted ways of the people who follow other faiths.

In this light, one must look upon the Church as a wholly unsuccessful organization, because it neither manages to fill the pews on a Sunday, nor does it bring the Gospel to save the fallen, and nor does it direct non-Christians to the ‘right path’.

Presumably, and I think it’s a reasonable presumption on my part, the Church believes that theirs is the true faith, and that only by following the Gospel of Jesus Christ can man find Salvation. After all, to be a Christian is to believe that there is only one way to God; and that is through His Son, the Christians’ Saviour and Redeemer.

So what has gone wrong in the Church of England? Why doesn’t its head see the need to fill the pews and preach the Gospel?

Simon Heffer has been quoted on June 7, 2006 in The Telegraph as saying the following: "We are not a multicultural society. We are a monocultural one tolerant of other cultures, and whose clear identity is understood by the people, if not by their leaders. We are an old country with a strong sense of continuity. And anyone who trifles with such manifestations of our antiquity and stability does so at his peril."

I would concur with this statement.

Don’t our Church leaders realize that our way of life is under attack? Don’t they realize that the free world is actually at war with radical Islam? Don’t they realize, further, that radical Islam is out to destroy our civilization? And don’t they realize that they are trying, through the jihad, or holy war, to drive Westerners into a state of Dhimmitude?

Is this balderdash the best that the Church leaders can come out with?

Ibn Khaldun, a famous fourteenth century historian, described Islam’s ideological drive to dhimmitude thus:

”In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the mission and convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority [religion and politics] are united , so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them at the same time.” - (Source: Bat Ye’or’s The Decline of Eastern Christianity under Islam: From Jihad to Dhimmitude)

Moreover, Bat Ye’or, a great scholar on this subject, tells us that the Jihad is unique. She says:

”It is, in fact, the only war of an everlasting and universal offensive nature attached to a religious system.”

…“All those strategies which constitute the jihad represent the means to compel by force the targeted populations to enter into dhimmitude. Despite analogies with other political regimes, dhimmitude remains an irreducible and specific structure, linked to a particular ideological and political order. It can only be compared with other systems by a superficial amalgamation. In fact, dhimmitude emanates from the jihad and the shari’a.”
Our leaders are taking us down the primrose path to dhimmitude, which will mean second class status to YOU and ME. That our politicians are doing so is bad enough; that our Church leaders are also engaging in this, is deplorable.

In the light of this fact, one can but ask oneself some simple questions: What are our Church leaders hoping to achieve by giving away our Christian heritage? Who has given them the right to do so? Why are they selling out their Christian principles? Have they forgotten the message of the Gospel? Don’t they believe anymore that there is only one path that leads to God – the Christian path?

It seems to me that successive Archbishops of Canterbury have reneged on their responsibilities to revivify the Church in periods of steep decline. In this regard, these Church elders can hardly be considered leaders at all. What do organizations do with managing directors who fail to make a healthy profit for the company of which they are head? What does society do with prime ministers and presidents who fail to lead?

So what is different about our Church leaders? Do they really deserve to remain in lead positions if they fail to fill the pews, if they fail to preach the Gospel?

Islam happens to be knocking on the West’s door; indeed, millions of its adherents have already been let in to the West. They are just biding their time to increase their numbers to bring their population to critical mass before they make a bid for power. Time is on their side, not ours.

Have our Church leaders not noticed one thing: Mosques throughout the country are full to bursting. Can they not imagine why this is so? Have they not yet figured out that leaders in the Islamic faith are convinced of the righteousness of their own faith, convinced of their ultimate destiny to take over our country and its institutions, convinced of their destiny to become the establishment?

Why do people follow such a backward faith so readily? Well, although this is a complex question, and there are many reasons, one thing stands out, possibly above all other reasons: Muslim leaders preach one message, an unchangeable message, and do not cast doubt into the hearts of the faithful. This is actually the essence of true leadership. To lead, one has to be confident and sure of one’s mission, confident and sure of one’s purpose, confident and sure of one’s destiny.

In matters of leadership, it helps not one jot to be riven by self-doubt. No person can make an effective leader when plagued by self-doubt. Self-doubt, however, is what characterizes our Church leaders. It is this self-doubt that is leading the Church into terminal decline. Without a turn around in the Church’s fortunes, this terminal decline will impact greatly on the fabric of British society. The nature of British society will be changed forever.

To reverse this terminal decline, the leaders of the Church need to remember one thing: Nothing succeeds like success! At this late stage, the Church’s fortunes can only be reversed one step at a time. It is high time that this first step be taken.

The multicultural claptrap needs to stop; positive steps to reverse the decline of the Church still further need to be put in place. Dr Williams: Time is not on the Church’s side.

©Mark Alexander

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Should Australia MSM Print Mo Cartoons?

Martin the crazy socialist/communist/anarchist that operates the IslamophobiaWatch site has been very successful flooding an Australian poll.

Should an Australian newspaper publish the Prophet Mohammad cartoon?
Vote here

Posted on Wednesday, June 7, 2006 by Martin Sullivan in Resisting Islamophobia, Australia | Comments Off

Here's is the poll results as of 1:30pm June 7th.

Now how did that poll get so lopsided? I guess all those Muslims sitting around at their PCs collecting the jizya have nothing better to do.

Vote if you want by visiting the wacky IslamophobiaWatch post here.

BUSH: It's NOT Amnesty, You Fucking Idiot Citizens!!

Bush is a liar. And he keeps telling lies and deceiving the American public. I've seen both of his news conferences as he makes his bullshit adventure at the border. Apparently Rove told him that saying "Mexicans are here doing the work AMERICANS WON'T DO" wasn't a good lie, it wasn't going over well. So now, he says "Mexicans are doing the work AMERICANS AREN'T DOING." Got that?

Besides insulting those real Republicans who don't want amnesty, he keeps insisting that "IT'S NOT AMNESTY." What a liar? Let's look at the definition for amnesty. Amnesty is defined as 'A general pardon granted by a government.' Now illegal aliens, per our law, are to be deported PERIOD. The Bush/Senate "Dissove America Now" Amnesty Bill grants a pardon for illegal aliens. They are not to be removed. All this other stuff about a fine ($2000) and having to apply with special privileges and rights for citizenship is all noise. This is AMNESTY and Bush can lie and lie and lie. You know you have a liberal in the White House when he lies and insults the American citizen's intelligience.

Again, Bush, announce you are a DemocRAT! Go ahead, you lying Democrat.

REMEMBER THESE ARE THE TRAITORS IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY and are on the core republican party hit list to get rid of by voting out of office:

BUSH (We can't get rid of him until the next Presidential election.)

The 23 Senate Turncoats:

Bennett (R-UT)
Brownback (R-KS)
Chafee (R-RI)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID) ..
DeWine (R-OH)
Domenici (R-NM)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)¬
Murkowski (R-AK)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)

Monday, June 05, 2006

A Dhimmi Classic Photo from the Dhimmi Toronto Star

This is from LGF. With that ridiculous headline, they chose THAT photo? Are the citizens of Canada laughing at the absurd propaganda and ridiculous lengths that the dhimmi press will go to protect Islam? Who is in charge of the media? Himmel? It is nutty.

Name That Elephant!

Here's a witty article from a journalist in Canada that gets it.

Perhaps not all is lost in Canada.

Ignoring the biggest elephant in the room

Monday, June 5, 2006, Page A1

I drove back from yesterday's news conference at the Islamic Foundation of Toronto in the northeastern part of the city, but honestly, I could have just as easily floated home in the sea of horse manure emanating from the building.

So frequent were the bald reassurances that faith and religion had nothing -- nothing, you understand -- to do with the alleged homegrown terrorist plot recently busted open by Canadian police and security forces, that for a few minutes afterward, I wondered if perhaps it was a vile lie of the mainstream press or a fiction of my own demented brain that the 17 accused young men are all, well, Muslims.

But no. I have checked. They are all Muslims.

Such is the state of ignoring the biggest, fattest elephant in the room in this country that at one point Chief Blair actually bragged -- this in answer to a question from the floor -- "I would remind you that there was not one single reference made by law enforcement to Muslim or Muslim community" at the big post-arrest news conference on Saturday.

Indeed, law-enforcement types there took enormous pains to say just the opposite: The arrested men are from a diverse variety of backgrounds ("They're students, they're employed, they're unemployed" one official said, which is akin to running the gamut from A to oh, C); they come from all parts of Canadian society; blah, blah, blah.

Even before I knew for sure that they're all Muslims, I suspected as much from what I saw on the tube, perhaps because I am a trained observer, or you know, because I have eyes.

The accused men are mostly young and mostly bearded in the Taliban fashion. They have first names like Mohamed, middle names like Mohamed and last names like Mohamed. Some of their female relatives at the Brampton courthouse who were there in their support wore black head-to-toe burkas (now there's a sight to gladden the Canadian female heart: homegrown burka-wearers darting about just as they do in Afghanistan), which is not a getup I have ever seen on anyone but Muslim women.

And from far outside the courthouse, if the Muslim question wasn't settled, there was the likes of Scarborough Imam Aly Hindy telling the Toronto Star that: "Because they are young people and they are Muslims, they are saying it is terrorism."

But what came clear at that meeting yesterday, which was an odd mix of community venting and news conference, is that many of those people who went to the microphone to ask questions, and some of those who answered them from the podium, are far more concerned about a possible anti-Muslim backlash to the arrests than they are about the allegations that a whole whack of their young people were bent on blowing something up in the city; that they are generally worked up about Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and the Americans in Iraq, and that even as they talk about Islam being a religion of peace, they do not sound or appear particularly peaceable.

Saturday, June 03, 2006

The New Canuck Girls

How many of these canuck girls live off the state? Now with their husbands and brothers going away for a long time, the Canadian taxpayer can take care of them. Nothing like a little jizya with your plotting to murder the najis infidels.

Ban Islam, Deport Muslims = Terrorism in the West Solved

Could it not be any more clear? The 17 Muslims who were planning to kill thousands of Infidels in Canada were allowed to immigrate to Canada. The US does the same. We have several million Muslims in the US and all of them are terrorists, some use the tonque and the pen, not bombs, but all are scheming liars deceiving the naive infidels and our stupid leaders. Why don't we BAN ISLAM and deport all Muslims? Political correctness and multiculturalism will destroy the West.

Here is the initial 12 identified terrorists in Canada who wanted to kill thousands of infidels.

17 held on terrorism charges
A list of the adults arrested and charged with terrorism-related offences under the Criminal Code. Five youths, who cannot be named, were also charged:

1. Fahim Ahmad, 21, Toronto;
2. Zakaria Amara, 20, Mississauga, Ont.;
3. Asad Ansari, 21, Mississauga;
4. Shareef Abdelhaleen, 30, Mississauga;
5. Qayyum Abdul Jamal, 43, Mississauga;
6. Mohammed Dirie, 22, Kingston, Ont.;
7. Yasim Abdi Mohamed, 24, Kingston;
8. Jahmaal James, 23, Toronto;
9. Amin Mohamed Durrani, 19, Toronto;
10. Steven Vikash Chand alias Abdul Shakur, 25, Toronto;
11. Ahmad Mustafa Ghany, 21, Mississauga;
12. Saad Khalid, 19, of Eclipse Avenue, Mississauga.

What is common about their names? THEY'RE ALL MUSLIMS just doing the murdering no other religion wants to do.

Look at how deep the Muslim penetration of Dar al Canada has become:

Canadian intelligence services warned last week that the country faced an increasing threat from "homegrown terrorists".

Jack Hooper, deputy director of operations at CSIS, said the service was trying to keep track of 350 "high-level" targets as well as 50 to 60 organisations thought to be linked to groups such as al-Qaeda.

Why isn't Canada banning these "50 to 60 organizations?" Oh that's right, they are 'religious' organizations so they can go around and promote the murder of the infidels and stealing all the infidel booty. Mustn't do that, they worship the same God as the Christians and have the perfected scriptures. Haven't you heard?

Friday, June 02, 2006

The Socialists in Europe Are Eager to be Islamicized

FROM THE ICE VIKING. What can you say? Welcome to Eurabia.

Friday, June 02, 2006
Minister in the Swedish government and member of the ruling Social Democratic Party: we will become Islamized
(translation to from Swedish is mine)

"We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and the Muslims because when we will become the minority they will be like that towards us."

Jens Orback, minister in the Swedish government, 2004

The original quote in Swedish:

"Vi måste vara öppna och toleranta mot islam och muslimerna för när vi blir i minoritet kommer de att vara det mot oss."

Thursday, June 01, 2006

Dhimmi Carter Loves Traitor Bush's Open Borders "Destroy America" Plan

Do Republicans need any further proof that our President has gone DemocRATic on us? Let's see, who are Bush's superbest friends? Kennedy? Love him! Reid? Super best friends! McCain/Spectre/Frist? They love riding Bush's tilt-a-whirl? Again, why be a Republican when you dream like a Democrat? Leave the Republican Party, Traitor Bush. Leave. Just declare yourself a Democrat tomorrow and stop the pretense. Stop the lies. You know you have a liberal in the White House when he starts stating bold faced lies and saying everyone else is lying. Take 'amnesty.' All those other words and phrases the White House dreamed up - 'path to citizenship", earned citizenship. When the President plots to deceive the public, you know he is a liar, a deceptive man. Everyone in the Republican party is looking for the reason for the 'diaarray' and lack of unity? They only need to look down the street at the White House at that backstabbing RINO we voted for.

The Carter Center:
Carter praises Bush's immigration stance By DOUG GROSS, Associated Press Writer
Wed May 24, 11:29 PM ET

ATLANTA - Former president Carter, a Democrat and frequent critic of President Bush, sees eye-to-eye with him on immigration.

Carter on Wednesday called the Republican president's commitment to immigration reform "quite admirable," saying he agrees with Bush's support of a system that would eventually grant citizenship to some illegals.

The Senate is set to vote as early as Thursday on a bill that calls for tougher border security as well as an eventual chance at citizenship for millions of men and women in the country illegally.

The law should secure the nation's borders while "at the same time treating those who are here with respect and giving them some hope for the future," Carter said.

The Senate plan, which closely mirrors Bush's own proposal, faces an uncertain fate in the House, where representatives have passed legislation that would expose all illegal immigrants to felony charges.

Carter spoke at the close of a three-day forum of international human rights workers at The Carter Center in Atlanta. Human rights activists from 22 countries attended the forum.


The Socialists Are Rewriting THEIR History to Cement Their Alliance with Islam

Isn't it a tad ironic? The Socialists, who have been allying themselves with Muslims, on issues related to accomodating Muslim queerness, are rewriting their own history to show how this makes senese. Never mind, that the Islamic imperialist creed is 180 degrees opposite of the universal, socialist state where no one is on top. It's really quite laughable. Why do this? Because of two things. One, they need more bodies. There aren't enough active Communists and socialists to go around to have a global movement. Two, and this is the most foolish, the old "feed the alligator, and plan to make it into a purse once you have destroyed the conservatives and capitalists." Of course, instead of a purse, you get eaten. But that is the plan that the Socialists have undertaken.

The following is an excerpt from an article "The Bolsheviks and Islam" by Dave Couch at International Socialism. Now Dave here is a real Lenin worshipper and to him, he is the only socialist that matters.

"My aim is to rescue Lenin’s record from the slurs cast on him by the right, and to draw some lessons from the Bolsheviks’ experience. The matter is one of more general significance for a small and battered revolutionary left emerging from isolation after 30 years of downturn. As Alex Callinicos has pointed out, ‘The issue of the hijab is really a symptom of the real problem, which is how to expand our movement to embrace those at the bottom of European society who suffer both economic exploitation and racial oppression and many of whom, for that very reason, strongly attach themselves to their Muslim faith’.4 If we dismiss workers because of the clothes they wear or the beliefs they hold, we condemn ourselves to the sectarian wilderness. It is hardly an exaggeration to say the left has an internationalist duty to stand with Muslims against racism and imperialism."

In other words, Muslims are the new victims for us to champion.

"a decree was one thing, but disestablishing the church in practice was another. In places Orthodox feeling ran high and there were instances in which congregations clashed with Bolsheviks over the control of church property. Popular support for Orthodoxy was significantly undermined, however, in late 1921 when its leader, Patriarch Tikhon, refused to sell off church valuables to raise foreign currency needed to feed famine victims, of whom there were millions. This was the context in which some 45 priests were executed for organising resistance to Trotsky’s campaign to seize wealth from the church. This harsh policy has to be seen in the context of a famine emergency, not as a malicious attack on the church.11"

Touche Couch. All that terror by Trotsky against the church, justified, the Church's fault.
The article rambles on with endless trivia about how Islam and Christianity were dealt with under all the beautiful leaders (Lenin, Stalin, etc) and finally reaches the Conclusion -

Under Lenin and Trotsky the Bolshevik leadership was true to its Marxist understanding that the revolutionary party must be atheist primarily in word, not deed, while the state must be non-religious but not anti-religious. Religious communities were given remarkable freedoms under the revolution, although the religion of the tsarist empire was the most likely to be circumscribed because of its strong links to the former ruling class. Religious believers, including Muslims, who considered themselves revolutionaries were welcomed into the Bolshevik ranks. Non-Communist believers who backed the revolution occupied leading positions in the state apparatus. Some major Muslim organisations joined the Communist parties in their entirety or joined with the Bolsheviks to defend the revolution.

The demands of Muslims for religious freedom were intimately connected with demands for national rights. The Bolsheviks fought alongside Muslims to win those rights from the tsarists and Russian colonialists, but also from the Communist ultra-lefts [Pray, tell me what a Communist ultra-left believes?]. These rights were fought for and won as part of the revolution, not granted as concessions by an anti-religious regime waiting for the moment to pounce on believers. The attacks on these rights originated among the Russian chauvinists of the former regime, many of whom were military men who flooded into the state machine after the civil war and gradually came to see Stalin as the leader of the counter-revolution. However, these elements were assisted by strong ultra-left currents among the Bolsheviks themselves who rejected Lenin’s approach and despised talk of national or religious rights. (These comrades overwhelmingly perished under Stalin.)

The Islamic veil was not an issue for the Bolsheviks under Lenin. The mass assault on the veil was launched in 1927 by Russian chauvinists and Stalinists, a frightening harbinger of the calamity of forced collectivisation a few years later. Forced unveiling was a Stalinist policy that turned Leninism on its head. So in standing up for the right of Muslim women to wear the hijab in Europe today, marching alongside Muslims against the occupations of Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan, defending the right of Muslims to oppose those occupations by force, and joining with left wing Muslims in united front coalitions such as Respect, socialists are upholding a tradition that goes back to Lenin and Trotsky.

Voila, an alliance is justified and made. It is so absurd, so ridiculous, but there you have it. History revised, alliances made.

Traitor Bush Says House is Wrong, the People are Stupid for Opposing His Open Borders Anarchy

Do we need any further proof that Bush is a traitor to the Republican Party? He keeps pushing for open borders, free citizenship for everyone, just show up, and the conversion of America into another Pakistan. Well, maybe he hasn't gone that far, but I truly despise the man. Why be a Republican if your beliefs are the same as Democrats?

Bush calls for House, Senate compromise on immigration

Thursday, June 1, 2006; Posted: 11:00 a.m. EDT (15:00 GMT)

Traitor President Bush tells the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (we all know what they want) on Thursday that immigration reform will be difficult.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush Thursday urged the House and Senate to work out compromise legislation on immigration reform, and said opponents of one of his key proposals are taking an approach that's "wrong and unrealistic." [Really Traitor Bush? Why don't you just say it? You are a traitor, a Democrat. I despise you.]

In a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the president said reconciling the bills already passed by the two chambers will be difficult.

"Yet the difficulty of this task is no excuse for avoiding it," he said. "The American people (uh, that is the Democrats I represent] expect us to meet our responsibility and deliver immigration reform that fixes the problems in the current system [Right, while I destroy America and welcome Muslims, the beautiful peaceful people]."

It's Israel's Fault....

Late last night, I happened to catch a panel presentation by "Negotiators" for the Palestinians on CSPAN. It was a weird mix of Muslims and anarchists explaining why the Palestinians are in the mess they are in...It's all Israel's fault. You see, when Israel left Gaza, that caused all the chaos, the greenhouse destruction, the brewing civil war. All of it. Why they hardly mentioned Hamas at all. I think these guys work for the PLO or the PA, and they avoided the "Hamas problem" completely. It was like a circus. The anarchists would get up and babble stringing together euphemisms that have no meaning. In the end, they concluded Israel is to blame for the Palestinian corruption, murders and chaos. Yep, all Israel's fault that the Palestinians are murderers, thieves and slaves to Islam. Not a single questioner asked how these people even represent the Palestinians since they are NOT appointed by Hamas. It was truly pathetic. There is no negotiation partner in Palestine, just some clowns and murderers pretending they are legit. Where's the hook when you need it? Disorganized, deceptive, and an organizational wreck. That is what this group has become. Oh, and it's all Israel and the US' fault in case you were wondering.

I found the link page on CSPAN for the presentation, but when you try to link to the video, you get a page not found.

The Palestine Center Forum on Middle East Peace Process
A panel presents the Palestine Liberation Organization's political position on Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's efforts for peace with Palestine. Panel speakers include Maen Areikat and Khaled El-Gindy among others.
5/31/2006: WASHINGTON, DC: 1 hr.