Reading our recent article about the laughably, unintentionally-ironically named “Islamic Human Rights Commission” and their legal jihad in the UK got me thinking. (Editor’s note-- Islam gives individuals only one ‘human right’, and that is to be an expendable slave of Allah. Some right, eh?)
Why can’t we infidels use the same tactics against the enemy that the Jihadists are currently using against us? Why must we ceaselessly endure a situation where our own legal system is used as yet another weapon of the Great Islamic Jihad? The jihadists’ use of our own courts in their Holy War on the infidels is deliberate, and is also known as “lawfare”, with groups like the ACLU as their willing and eager accomplices.
I say, let’s turn the tables and use the courts to defend ourselves for a change. And the best defense is usually a good offense.
We need lots of attorneys to start filing numerous lawsuits against Muslims. Muslim governments, Muslim “interest groups” like CAIR, Muslim “charities”, religious organizations, Muslim banks, Muslim-owned companies, and so on, are all legitimate targets for our proposed legal counter-jihad.
Now, what should our legal counter-jihad charge the enemy with? Well, the PI team has a few ideas about that. Although the PI blogging team has precious little, if any, actual legal experience, we feel that we do have some good ammo to offer the lawyers. Hence the following…
We at Pedestrian Infidel hereby indict Mohammed in absentia (AKA “the prophet”, AKA “the last messenger”), the ideological movement which this individual founded, hereby known as “Islam”, and his followers/descendents on the following charges:
- Murder
- Conspiracy to commit murder
- Terrorism, Terrorism, and even more Terrorism
- Air/Sea Piracy
- Engaging in a conspiracy to unlawfully and/or violently overthrow governments, including but not limited to the US, Israel, UK, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, and others
- Rape (including statutory rape)
- Deliberate targeting of civilians and noncombatants
- Torture and murder of POWs
- Torture and murder of civilians
- Cruelty to animals
- Use of weapons of mass destruction and criminal attempts to acquire and employ more of same
- Incitement of hatred (AKA ‘hate speech’)
- Arson
- Blackmail
- Perjury and deception (AKA ‘taqiyya’)
- Money laundering
- Counterfeiting
- Armed Robbery
- Breaking and Entering (AKA ‘burglary’)
- Extortion (AKA ‘jizya’)
- Racketeering
- Kidnapping and ransom
- Domestic violence (AKA ‘wife beating’)
- Child abuse
- Contributing to the delinquency of minor(s)
- Immigration violations and fraud
- Waging genocide (religious, cultural, and physical)
- Engaging in a ongoing conspiracy to commit further genocide
- We further charge that “Islam” is not only a clear and present danger to the Infidel World, but also itself constitutes a massive Crime Against Humanity.
The Pedestrian Infidels rest their case.



3 comments:
As I recall, the lawsuits that victims and their families of 9/11 filed lawsuit against Saudi Arabia, etc., and the US government intervened to have the courts reject the case - sovereignty protection, reciprocity and all that rot.
The ACLU is SO BUSY!!! They have been screwing in Mo's bed, one of his favorite ho's.
Who says we have to lie down and accept this legal rebuff from the US GOV? We go ahead and file more cases against our sham Muslim allies, Moslem companies, banks, corporations, charities, activist groups, Moslem NGOs, etc etc-- appeals if necessary. We file suit against Islamic states in non American courtrooms, against Islamic NGOs, etc. This is no time to throw in the towel.
There is no final say in a court of law, and we can use that to our advantage
Your list is far too short.
Post a Comment