Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Islamic supremacy, Malaysian style

I've been saying all along that Malaysia's carefully cultivated persona (especially to the incoming cash-loaded western/infidel tourists) of being a multicultural wet dream--well, it's a mirage. It's poppycock, taqiyya, propaganda. Malaysia is essentially an Islamic state--the Muslims, or Malays, are firmly in charge. In fact, Muslims run the show in all major sectors of Malaysian government and society. In "government linked companies", it's the Muslims that completely dominate, out of all proportion to their total numbers. Non muslims are, at best, second class citizens. This domination is looking to get worse, at least as far as the infidels are concerned.

And Malaysia keeps passing itself off to the world as a 'moderate, modern' Muslim majority state. It's all basically an outrageous lie, but Malaysia gets away with it, year after year. The local dhimmis, powerless to change the situation, have only two choices: endure it or leave. The numbers below show that they are increasingly choosing to leave.

Here are some specific statistics and other facts, that I've recently found, that document the near total Islamic supremacy in this country:

  • Out of all the 5 major national banks, only one bank is multi-racial, the rest are controlled by Malays (by Malaysian law, all Malays must be Muslim. Hence, Malay always=Muslim)
  • 99% of Petronas (the state-owned oil company) directors are Malays
  • 3% of Petronas employees are Chinese
  • 99% of 2000 Petronas gasoline stations are owned by Malays
  • 100% of all contractors working under Petronas projects must be bumis (Malay)
  • Malay companies have no legal requirement to have non-Malay staff. But Chinese companies are legally required to have a minimum of 30% Malay staff.
  • Only 5% of all new recruits for government police, nurses, armed forces, are non-Malays.
  • Only 2% of the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) personnel are Chinese, a drop from 40% in 1960.
  • 2% is the percentage of non-Malays government servants in Putrajaya (the new administrative capital built in the 1990s). Malays make up the other 98%
  • 7% is the percentage of Chinese government servants in the whole government (in 2004), a drop from 30% in 1960
  • 95% of government contracts are given to Malays and Malay-owned companies
  • 100 large companies, set up, owned and managed by Chinese Malaysians were taken over by government, and later managed by Malays since 1970s--e.g. UTC, UMBC, MISC, etc
  • 8 trillion RM (about $2 trillion US) is the total amount the government channeled to Malays pockets through ASB, ASN, MARA, privatisation of government agencies, Tabung Haji etc, through NEP (New Economic Plan) over the last 34 years
  • 48 Chinese primary schools closed down since 1968 – 2000
  • 144 Indian primary schools closed down since 1968 – 2000
  • 2637 Malay primary schools built since 1968 – 2000
  • 2.5% is government budget for Chinese primary schools. Indian schools get only 1%, Malay schools get 96.5%
  • All ten public university vice chancellors are Malays
  • 25% is Malaysian Chinese population in 2004, a drop from 45% in 1957
  • 7% is the present Malaysian Indians population (2004), a drop from 12% in 1957
  • 2 millions Chinese Malaysians have emigrated overseas since 1960
  • 0.5 million Indians Malaysians have emigrated overseas since 1960
  • 3 millions (Muslim) Indonesians have migrated into Malaysia and became Malaysian citizens with bumi (Malay) status since 1960.
  • Malays get an automatic 5% to 15% discount to buy real estate, property, or a house, regardless of the Malay's economic status
  • Special Malay-only government investment fund called ASB/ASN makes an average annual return of 12%, while banks fixed deposit rate is only about 3.5% per annum.
  • 2% is what Chinese new villages get compare with 98% of what Malays villages got for rural development budget
  • 3000 mosques/suraus have been built in all new housing estates throughout Malaysia since 1970. During the same period, zero temples or churches have been built in housing estates
  • Construction of new churches and temples anywhere in Malaysia is virtually impossible. As an example of this, one project for a new Catholic Church in Shah Alam lanquished in the government construction application process for 20 years. Even after the project backers agreed to make the church resemble a "factory", approval has not yet been forthcoming from the Malay authorities as of 2004

Monday, February 27, 2006

Bill O'Reilly Interviews Claire Berlinski, author of Menace in Europe


Bill O'Reilly interviewed Claire Berlinski tonight. Ms. Berlinski is the author of Menace In Europe. I checked Amazon and it has just been made available. She did a great job. Interestingly, she talked initially about the secularization of Europe, loss of Christianity, and isolated individualism but she then talked about 'radical Islam.' Dismayed by Spain's surrender after the Madrid train bombing, she talked about how the appeasement she is seeing is just like watching a replay of the 1930's. What is good from my point of view is that O'Reilly became interested in reading the book and promised he would. That gives me hope because O'Reilly has been incredibly ignorant about Islam. As you know, he would not interview Robert Spencer, and, by evidence, has certainly not read any of his books. Perhaps Ms. Berlinski's book, which I have not read except for the Amazon write up, will broaden Mr. O'Reilly's understanding of Islam. One can hope.

Another book about the soon to be born Eurabia is Bruce Bawer's While Europe Slept : How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within. This is new too. I am glad we are seeing these books and hope they get much exposure. I have read articles by Bruce Bawer and he understands Islam. And I believe Ms. Berlinski does also just from her 3 minute discussion with Bill. You could sense her urgency in discussing Islam. I'm going to ask my librarian to buy them both and I'll get at least one based on my past requests. You should too.

The rehabilitation of Hamas

It has already begun, with the MSM as eager (unindicted) co-conspirators.

From the latest edition of Newsweek:

'Not Lovers of Blood'
The Hamas leader on Israel and the Palestinians

...Last week NEWSWEEK's Lally Weymouth spoke by phone to the newly designated Hamas prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh. He was speaking from Shati refugee camp in Gaza, where he lives with his wife and 12 children [lots of future martyrs in this family, I'm certain of that].

Haniyeh: The withdrawal from Gaza was based on a unilateral decision and a unilateral plan. It was not [done] out of the generosity of Israel. We ask, is Israel committed to all these agreements? We are not war seekers nor are we war initiators. We are not lovers of blood. We are oppressed people with rights. If peace brings us our rights, then this is good.
Uh huh, sure. And the MSM laps it all up.

And so do the dhimmicrats on both sides of the Atlantic. The EU has announced 'emergency funds' to the tune of 120 million euros to "stave off (a) Palestinian funds crisis". Meanwhile, the "Islam is Peace" White House has pledged to continue, ahem, "humanitarian funding" for those poor Palestinians. Really, just because they elected a bunch of tyrannical murderous terrorist thugs, now why should we should let them starve or go without band-aids?

Got to hand it to Bush, he never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity.

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Bush & Condi's Fragile Art Work "Light Unto the Mohammedans" Shatters

I always thought it was a piece of junk. More like one of those stupid collages you did in school, clipping photos from magazines and plenty of Elmer's glue. A work of crap. Now their creation shatters to the floor, and yet, Condi and Bush keep on pretending that their democracy project means something, achieved something. That the 1/2 TRILLION dollars spent on Iraq is worth it, and made us safer. Can you imagine how advanced our alternative energy strategy could have been? We could have offered $20,000 rebates to eligible households that installed solar panels reducing their electricity bills by 50%. That's just one example. It's pointless to consider what could have been. But what must come to be is reality in the White House, the end of denial. Their glorious piece of 'work' has shattered, and the American public knows it.

From VIEW FROM THE RIGHT (Lawrence Auster):

BUSH'S AND RICE'S ALTERNATIVE REALITY BREAKING DOWN


By Lawrence Auster

I’ll start by quoting Barry Schweid’s article for the AP in which he summarizes Secretary Rice’s recent woes:

WASHINGTON (AP)—It was probably Condoleezza Rice’s unhappiest week as secretary of state, one so disappointing that it raises questions about the Bush administration’s ability to shape Middle East events in the near term. During her three days in the region, Egyptian and Saudi Arabian leaders—with Rice standing awkwardly at their side before the news media—refused to support the U.S. financial boycott of the militant group Hamas as it takes control of the Palestinian parliament.

In Iraq, sectarian violence threatened to turn into a civil war, setting back efforts by President Bush and Rice to construct a democratic government that would shine as an example for the entire area.

And a deal with the United Arab Emirates, one of America’s few close Arab friends, to operate some terminals at six major U.S. ports unexpectedly ignited bipartisan anger in Congress and forced at least a delay of the transaction.

Each instance not only illustrated the chasm between the United States and the Arab world but seemed to widen it.

As we look at Rice’ numerous problem areas,—the Hamas election; the refusal of Arab governments to join America’s financial boycott of Hamas; sectarian violence in Iraq; and the uproar in the U.S. over the UAE ports deal—is there a common element running through them? Yes, there is. It is the crashing into reality of the Bush/neoconservative/liberal dogma which says that all people are like us and that differences don’t matter.

Thus: For us, democracy is compatible with civilized norms of conduct, therefore it should also be so for the Palestinians. But it’s not.

Thus: We believe that an organization devoted to waging terror war to destroy a sovereign nation is a bad thing that should be shunned, therefore Arab potentates should believe it too. But they don’t.

Thus: In America we don’t need a dictator to keep different religious denominations from killing each other and blowing up each other’s churches, therefore the Iraqis shouldn’t need one either. But they do.

And thus: “We”—meaning Bush and Rice and their fellow globalist elites—take it as a matter of course that Arabs are just as safe a bet for handling U.S. ports as any other national group, and therefore all Americans should feel the same. But they don’t.

With that last example, the pattern I thought I had found changes in an interesting way. It’s not that non-Americans turn out to be different from Americans, it’s that most Americans, and most of the human race, are different from Bush and Rice and the elites that support them. When it comes to the false, extreme, and destructive idea that humanity consists of a mass of interchangeable units sharing the same desires for freedom and democracy, there is only one group in the world that truly believes it—our rulers. So rigid is their faith in this false vision of humanity that even when it comes crashing down around them, as recounted in the above article, they can’t see it. Like ideological zombies, they keep smugly repeating the same formulae.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

Inside the Forbidden Fortress

Even though I am an apostate, in secret, I still have to pretend I am a Moslem by going to the mosque, praying and reading the Koran. I am still living with my intensely Moslem family and they, of course, don’t know I have converted out of Islam. So I have to keep up the appearance of being devoutly Moslem myself, no matter how much I hate it.

So, during the last Ramadan, I was reading the Koran, in the mosque, pretending as usual--since it was the Ramadan so there was no escaping for me anyway. Now, I love to chew Extra—it’s my favorite gum. And I always chew it during the day, no matter where I am, even in the mosque. I wasn’t even aware of my gum-chewing, but someone else close by apparently was. An Arab approached me, and told me, "reading the Koran while chewing gum is sinful, you might not be able to pronounce the words in the Koran perfectly." I replied, "I am not reading it out loud anyway, so it doesn’t matter." Not backing down one bit, the arrogant Arab said, "it does." And the other Moslems around me, including my father, quickly ganged up on me and supported my opponent; they even wanted me to throw away my precious gum …

At that point, I promptly stopped 'reading' the Koran and walked out of the mosque.

You might be able to guess what happened after I walked out. My father was infuriated with me, and he lectured me angrily, at length, on how important it was for me to avoid doing something like that ever again. I got his point.

Many out there in the blogosphere might not know what goes on inside the mosque, what the environment is like in such places and what do people do in there, apart from praying.

Well, to start off, mosques were actually not just places of worship but also the places for Moslems to gather for any reason deemed necessary. Mosques are the place where Moslems used to gather not just to pray, but to listen to Mohammed (or another appropriately devout follower of Muhammed) harangue the faithful, prepare for battles/wars, and most importantly, to store weapons and captured booty.

If in the event a Moslem-controlled settlement or town was ever assaulted by a non Moslem force, the mosque would be the location most important for the infidels to capture. The mosques of yesteryear (and this is still true to this day in many places) are literally strongholds, fortresses designed to resist attack. Whoever controls the mosque controls in fact the surrounding area-- something the coalition forces in Afghanistan and Iraq hopefully are already aware of. Thusly, mosques are typically a stoutly-built complex of rooms, which are used for housing any required jihadists to defend the structure, as well as any required supplies to resist/endure a siege. During less violent times, this space was given over to the local mullah, his wives, children, slaves and concubines, and other booty captured from the infidels in past battles.

Today, in some places, mosques are not used for all these purposes. But in many parts of the world (namely the Middle East and other places in the Islamic world) the mosque still plays an important role. The mosque is not just a hall; it is ‘the Pentagon’ where Moslems plot and plan the ongoing jihad against the non Moslems. If it sounds strange and weird to non Moslems, it really is—you just have to step inside to feel it.

Most mosques are surrounded by high fences and/or walls, which may be topped off with spikes or barbed wire. Not exactly welcoming, is it? Passing through the gates of a typical mosque, you first enter a courtyard which is used whenever the prayer hall of the mosque is occupied. Moslems have to pray, so they don’t mind standing outside to pray if need be. After all, if Moslems don’t pray, Allah isn’t happy and Moslems believe that one must always follow Allah, no matter how much pain and trouble that involves. The more suffering undertaken for Allah, the happier he is with you.

When you enter the mosque's main hall (that’s the place you get to right after the courtyard, bathrooms, toilets and residential rooms are usually in the back or on the side) you see a lot of people in there. Some are standing, some are sitting, some are prostrating, some are bowing, a couple of people might be talking to each other (all this happens after they are done with the normal prayer procedures and the mullah isn’t leading anymore), but that’s not a normal practice.

Being in a mosque gives me an odd feeling inside that’s tough to put into words. Every mosque I've been in (and that's a fair number) has a feeling of submission about it. By submission, I mean that everyone in this place has had their identity essentially destroyed by the straitjacket that is Islam. It is all quiet, but it isn't the peaceful sort of quiet. There is no peace—there is, rather, a palpable sense of fear. Even today, it seems people are afraid of Mohammed, like he might come back from hell and punish anyone that doesn't follow his teachings. Muslims in a mosque don’t dare do anything that would make him mad--they’re still bowing down to his will and command. Mo still has authority and power over all these people, and a hold over his minions that is difficult for non Moslems to understand. But nevertheless, it is real and must be reckoned with.

It is only when you enter a mosque do you understand fully why they are so crazy about their religion, why they want it to dominate, why they’d do anything for it. Mohammed is still there in every mosque and the old memories are refreshed everyday. The only thing you can hear clearly is the words being recited from the Koran and nothing else. You look around, you see people focusing on just one thing, Islam. Their respect for Mohammed, their will to sacrifice for Islam, it multiplies many fold when they come together in the mosque, and they carry that feeling with them when they walk out back into the world.

If you ever get the chance of hearing a mullah, do listen to him closely, if you can understand. You will surely hear words like ‘May Allah destroy the infidels and give their possessions to us’, especially on Fridays. I've heard such things many times in a mosque, more times than I can count. In some parts of the world that prayer is actually written on the front wall of the mosque. There used to be a custom when the mullah used to give the sermon with a sword in his hand. Many carry that tradition till this day, but some have toned it down by holding a cane instead of a sword. Cane or sword, it still symbolizes the absolute jihadist nature of Islam.

The words ‘Islam is a religion of peace, harmony and tolerance’ immediately lose all meaning upon entering a mosque. In any mosque, there is no peace, there is no harmony and there is no tolerance for anything but Moslems and Islam. The Moslems whom you may have met an hour before and who said they are against the jihadis and what they’re doing, those very Moslems shout out loud, ‘death to infidels’ in their neighborhood mosques. Not just once or twice, but as a matter of course. The very Moslem who tells you, ‘you have a beautiful son, God bless him’ will go to the mosque and pray for the same ‘son’ to be killed so that the religion of his Allah can take over.

Understanding what goes on inside the mosque, and what a mosque is all about, is critical to understanding what Islam is all about. It's just as important as understanding the Koran and Hadiths. The typical mosque has a power over Moslems that Osama Bin Laden or Zarqawi could never hope to have, that no mullah could ever have. A mosque is the house of Allah, a sacred place, where hope of victory for Moslems is always reborn. It gives them power, and the delusion that their twisted version of 'paradise', with all the virgins and palaces, is real and will be realized by all who fight the unbelievers.

The mosque symbolizes the strength of Islam; the mosque is a physical and spiritual fortress that Moslems are sure no kuffir could ever conquer.

Friday, February 24, 2006

Neil Bush and The Goofy Brother Syndrome


Neil Bush, a gigolo to Muslims, adulterer and general gadfly and sycophant, is going to really be a big embarassment for Bush, which he has been doing guite well by himself. Carter redux, but worse. What a schmuck! Totally incompetent, gullible and an 'easy piece.' Neil Bush, you and all those other pusilanimous dhimmis on the Saudi/Middle East 'consultant' payroll are traitors. Stupidity is not an excuse.

From Sapper's Fair and Balanced Rants and Raves:

Presidential brother Neil Bush, while giving a speech Monday in Saudi Arabia, condemned the American media for stereotyping the Arab world and urged Arab leaders to hire lobbyists and public relations representatives to combat these negative images as well as to sway public opinion to a more sympathetic view of Arabs in the Arab-Israeli conflict, according to reports in foreign media outlets. Bush implied that Israel has done a better job of getting its message across in the American media.

"The U.S. media campaign against the interests of Arabs and Muslims, and the American public opinion on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, could be influenced through a sustained lobbying and P.R. effort," said the younger Bush, according to the Arab News, Saudi Arabia's first English-language daily. "Public opinion shapes public policy dramatically. It's true in the U.S., in this part of the world and elsewhere."

White House spokesman Scott McClellan declined to comment. Bush, chairman and CEO of Ignite! Inc., an education software supplier, could not be reached for comment. Louise Thacker, the marketing manager for Ignite!, said that he was out of the country and unreachable; she said she could not provide a copy of his speech, nor could she comment on press accounts of his speech. She also said she had "no idea" who paid for the trip. State Department spokesman Greg Sullivan told Salon, "I can't say that we were contacted by Neil Bush's people" regarding his trip to the Gulf or the contents of his speech.

The Jeddah Economic Forum, where Bush delivered his remarks, was called to help maintain good relations between the United States and Saudi Arabia, which is the United States' second-largest supplier of oil. But -- perhaps inadvertently -- the younger Bush stepped on a number of tripwires in the highly precarious U.S.-Saudi relationship. His speech seems to touch on a number of Saudi complaints, from the American media being too tough on the Saudis, to whether U.S. support for Israel is a cause of terrorism and whether that support is a consequence of unfair media coverage -- by a media that the Saudis continually complain is under Zionist control. In each case, Bush seemed -- if his quotes were reported accurately -- to be preaching to the Saudi choir. And the speech seemed to only underline further the strong, historical connections between the Saudi royal family and the Bush clan.

The third annual forum, at which Bush was an attendee as well as a speaker, was sponsored by the business community in the port town. The area's business leaders include the Binladin Group construction company, the owners of which are the estranged relatives of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, who, long an enemy of the House of Saud, was stripped of his Saudi citizenship in 1994.

"American public opinion sees Arabs as terrorists and has the desert-man image about them," Neil Bush said, quoted this time by Agence France-Presse. "I wish the Americans would see Arabs and Muslims the way I see them ... but Arabs are losing the public relations battle in the United States."

Bush also suggested that the Arab-Israeli conflict was linked to terrorism. "In the speech, he called for the root causes of terror to be explored," according to the Arab News report, which then quoted Bush saying: "There could be economic disparities, social unrest or unemployment causing growing dissatisfaction in the region. But I have been told that the bigger issue is the resolving of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."

In response, James Taranto, a writer for the Wall Street Journal's Opinionjournal.com, called Neil "the Bush Black Sheep," and said that he -- like Roger Clinton and Billy Carter before him -- "has emerged to embarrass the man in the White House." Before now, Neil may be best known for his role as former director of the Silverado Banking, Savings and Loan Association from 1985 to 1988, who was sued by federal regulators in 1990 for the S&L's collapse, which cost taxpayers approximately $1 billion. Bush paid $50,000 in a court settlement.

Bush suffers from a credibility deficit

To say we are living in difficult times is a gross understatement. In actual fact, we are living in extremely dangerous times! They are dangerous for two main reasons: Our civilization is under attack not only from without but also from within! Indeed, the West is at a crossroads. Our very survival lies in the balance! Either we win this, or our civilization will bite the dust. This reminds me of Churchill’s fine and sage words: Without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized. No survival. …

The West has been under fire ever since 9/11, and even before that. But we have not risen to the challenges we face. The seriousness of the situation has been magnified manifold by our constant refusal to accept the reality of the challenges we do face.

To win a war, the war has to be defined in clear terms. No wars are won when the enemy is not defined. It is virtually impossible to win a war when a clear line is not drawn in the sand. There must be a clear line of demarcation. We don’t have one. So, as a result, we are fighting a war many are quite unable to understand. No wars are won that way. To win a war, the people, das Volk, the electorate, has to comprehend what the government is doing, comprehend why the war is being waged. It has to understand the objectives of that war. Moreover, it has to understand that sacrifices have to be made for a finite period of time.

Even today, even in these hedonistic times, if the electorate is made to understand that sacrifices have to be made in order to secure ultimate victory over the enemy, if the electorate is made to understand that the very survival of our way of life is at stake, then they will be prepared to make those sacrifices. However, one thing must be realized: No war was ever won without sacrifices!

Unfortunately, George W. Bush has failed to bring the people along with him in his ‘War on Terror’. There is constant bickering, and there are constant internal battles, too. Many people, Republicans and Democrats alike, do not agree with the way the President has waged this war; and in my opinion, with good reason. He has also failed to raise the morale of the people. Raising the morale of the people is extremely important. So important that it was one of Churchill’s trump cards.

For a start, trying to wage a ‘War on Terror’ is like trying to catch flies in a high wind: One minute they are here; another, they are there. Further, they multiply rather readily, too; so when, after great difficulty, a few have been caught, the new ones, younger ones, are around to bother us. So this was his first big mistake: To try and define the enemy as an ugly offshoot from a rather beautiful tree. The tree, in this case, is Islam, of course; and Bush seems convinced that it is a religion of love and peace. He sees the bastardized version of Islam that the ‘Islamists’ practise as a mutation, a sick mutation, from the real creed. Sadly, George W. Bush is greatly mistaken. He neither knows the history of Islam and how it has been spread nor does he understand its true nature!

It is my belief that one of the most important attributes of a leader of any Western country from now on is a thorough understanding of the nature of Islam. Just as Nazism was a huge threat for the free world in the 1930’s and 40’s, and just as communism was a huge threat to us after World War II, so Islam is a huge threat to the free world today. So it is imperative that our leaders know exactly what Islam is, what Islam’s aspirations are, and what are Islam’s means of achieving its goals. Without this profound understanding, we cannot hope to survive. Our civilization will go the way of many before it! It will be snuffed out.

It is a fact of life that what happens in America is of paramount importance to the rest of the free world. Europe and Australasia, for example, take their lead from the American President, even though it may sometimes appear as though they might not. Garbled messages coming out of the White House do not inspire confidence in the rest of the world. The rest of the free world thirsts for a strong US president to give a lead. Unfortunately, George W. Bush has not provided the free world with the lead they so desired.

The US is the beacon of freedom. If its light goes out, it will plunge the world into complete darkness. This is a fact of life.

Seven of the President's main errors of judgment immediately come to mind. They are:

He has failed to understand the true nature of Islam.

He has failed to define the enemy clearly.

He has failed to draw a sharp line of demarcation between the enemy and us. This has been made particularly blurred because he has tried to engage the enemy in this war against themselves. That is never a good strategy. It is a particularly poor strategy with Muslims, because they have such a great sense of loyalty to each other. Indeed, to a Muslim, it is a cardinal sin to go against his brother or sister in Islam!

He has chosen to fight a ‘War on [Islamic] Terror’ – a war which could, and probably will, go on for decades. The people will surely tire of this war, even if they haven’t done so already. It is also a very costly war, because it is a war without end. Waging such a costly war might well bankrupt America. Many wars do bankrupt the nations that wage them. If this happens, the President will have played right into the hands of Osama bin Laden, since one of OBL’s goals was to bankrupt the nation in the first place. If America is bankrupted, it will have to go cap in hand to the rich Arab world for handouts! This will surely be disastrous for the ‘Land of the Free’!

He has chosen to try and bring democracy to the Middle East. This was a particularly grave error of judgment because Islam and democracy are totally and utterly immiscible. The President has repeatedly refused to accept this; but it is a fact. Why are they immiscible? For several reasons: First and foremost among them is the fact that for a democracy to function properly, there simply has to be a strict and clear separation of church and state, a clear separation of the secular from the sacred. The separation of mosque and state is something which the Islamic world does not have (apart, perhaps, in Turkey where it has been kept separate only with the aid of a very strong military), and nor will it ever if Islam survives as a religion in its true form, since Islam rejects the concept of separation - totally! One of the defining characteristics of Islam is that there is to be no separation of politics and religion. The both simply meld into one. This is one of the Prophet Muhammad’s injunctions. How, then, can we hope to bring democracy to them? It goes against the teachings of their Prophet. Further, and very importantly, democracy is considered to be a Western form of government. All things Western are viewed with great suspicion in the Islamic world. But there is one more thing to consider: In a democracy, all power filters up to the leadership from the people via the polls; in a theocracy, the typical and natural form of government for Muslims, all power filters down to the leadership, and further, from Allah and His final Messenger! These circles simply cannot be squared.

Fact is that Iraq is now on the brink of civil war. Even today, the headlines in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Switzerland’s prestigious and extremely unsensational newspaper reads Im Irak droht ein Bürgerkrieg, which loosely translates as ‘Civil looms on the horizon in Iraq’. The BBC, also not known for its sensationalism, also has a story today on the threat of a civil war in Iraq. It’s entitled Iraq's civil war nightmare. If civil war breaks out in Iraq, the President’s foreign policy will be in tatters!

He has failed to give a clear signal to the Islamic world in the ‘cartoon war’ that freedom of speech and freedom of expression are of extreme importance in a free and democratic society. In fact, the White House said very little about it, except to say that it disagreed with the printing of the cartoons. Hence, the President has shown, yet again, that he is willing to appease the Islamic world, probably for the sake of contracts. The West’s insatiable desire for contracts is at variance with its need to survive as a civilization. There comes a point when we have to say: Principles come before contracts; principles come before greed!

One very positive thing can be said about the Islamic world: Muslims put their religious principles above economic considerations. (Does this, perhaps, make them unassailable?) We have seen this to be true over the cartoon controversy. Businesses in many countries in the Islamic world are asking people to boycott Danish products. Many of those businesses must have large stocks of goods from Denmark which they would prefer to let perish rather than to make a buck from their sale. Why? On a point of principle! How many Western businesses would do the same for Jesus? This willingness to sacrifice for their strong beliefs is, of course, a great strength to the Islamic world. It puts power in their elbows!

He has made a grave mistake in pushing for the six ports to fall into the hands of a firm in the UAE. It makes no sense because their loyalty is to their Muslim brothers, not to the infidels! And in any case, even if this firm can be trusted, the American people, by and large, are not in favour of such a move. Indeed, they are deeply suspicious of it, as indeed they should be. It is uncomfortable for them. So this decision can do nothing but further alienate the President from the people, his electorate. Moreover, it is a decision which has GREED written all over it!
Recent developments have done nothing to aid President Bush’s credibility; indeed, they have conspired to detract from it.

There is no doubt that Bush should have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Denmark in its fight for freedom of the press and the freedoms of speech and expression. That he has failed to do so is no testimony to his determination to ensure the survival of the free world. Indeed, it makes a mockery of it.

George Bush should under no circumstances allow the sale of the ports to the UAE. His credibility depends on the sale not going through. How can he expect the people to take his ‘War on Terror’ seriously when they see that he is prepared to take such risks with America’s ports?

If Iraq slips into civil war, it will further dent his popularity and credibility. Indeed, it could be a deathblow to this President, his administration, and any credibility that may remain.

As they say in German, Vorsicht ist die Mutter der Weisheit, or, translated, caution is the mother of wisdom. It would pay President Bush to be more cautious! He can ill afford this credibility deficit. The rest of his term in office depends on it.

©Mark Alexander

Cross-posted to A New Dark Age Is Dawning

Mark is the author of the book, The Dawning of a New Dark Age: A Collection of Essays on Islam

The mask has slid off

The lingering afterglow of the cartoonifada has brought out the Malay "jihadiputra" moonbats in force. One never has to scratch very far under the surface of Malaysia's carefully crafted (and disingenuous) "moderate" Muslim image to find avid supporters of Jihad. This secret, or not-so-secret love of Jihad goes hand-in-hand with the Malay mindset that blames all unrest and discord in the world squarely on the infidels. And especially the top kuffir country of all, the USA.

Local blog Malaysia Today quotes a recent International Herald Tribune (IHT) article that captures this Islamic delirium perfectly. Key grafs:

Something is seriously wrong when a Malaysian politician asks if a conflict between Malay Muslims living in southern Thailand and the Thai government is a product of American policy. "Surely," said Mohamad Nasir, from Alor Setar in the state of Kedah, "the American war against Islam has encouraged the Thai government to put down the Malays in southern Thailand."

The 'American war against Islam'? You mean this Mister Nasir hasn't been listening to Bush's endless 'Islam is the religion of peace' crap? I say it is high time that we infidels give the Muslims exactly what they think the Americans have been up to all along.

Remember, to Muslims, it's only war when the infidels fight back.
The perception has taken root in Asia that communal problems, even on a local scale, are part of a global Western conspiracy against Islam led by the United States. As a small group of protesters stoned the U.S. embassy in Jakarta in mid-February, organizers gave speeches blaming the West for wanting to destroy Islam by manipulating the issue of terrorism "and all those things are engineered by the United States."

They must have forgotten to mention Israel there. Surely, Israelis, Zionists and the evil Jooos have their fingers in everyone's pies ... don't they, Muslims of the world?
Everywhere it seems, Muslim sentiment and activism is a threat, in a part of the world once seen as a beacon of tolerance and moderation.
I hope this writer is correct about this. Because if he is, it means that, at last, the kuffirs of Southeast Asia may be finally waking up from their dhimmified stupor and waking up to the threat. The undeniable reality of Islamic intimidation, oppression, violence, and murder of any and all non-Muslims within reach is a real waking nightmare for so many, and not just in this part of the world. Muslim 'sentiment and activism', which the writer tries to make sound as innocuous as possible, is indeed a predatory threat. Islam is no sheep--it's a wolf!

And this mention of Islamic ‘tolerance and moderation’, stated like it's an indisputable fact, is in fact a mirage. It always has been! That part is nothing but western-conjured dhimmi fantasy.
But increasingly, Muslims are finding it hard to persuade their non-Muslim neighbors that peace lies at the core of Islamic dogma.
The IHT staff writer who penned this surely meant the readers to take it as yet more bad news. But for me, I take it as good news. It means (if it's true) that the infidels are becoming less and less likely to believe all the Muslim lies, deception and taqiyya about wanting 'peace'. Pedestrian Infidel knows all about the Islamic notion of peace.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Either we heal now, as a team, or else...

It seldom rains here…all I see and feel is the blazing sun whenever I head outside. Sometimes I fear I might find the sun out there at night too but luckily that hasn’t happened yet. This land is dead, and so is the rest of the Middle East. Wherever I look, there is depression, there’s silence, lifelessness…it’s like death. There is no hope; people who dare to walk on the streets in the blazing sun look like zombies. Between the unending desert heat and the Islam that percolates into every nook and cranny of life, I feel my soul is being sliced to pieces, slowly and painfully. And it hurts…it feels like death in slow motion. It is Hell realized.

But sometimes, even here in Hell, in the scorching hot desert, the weather does change. Occasionally, one can find cool soothing breezes. And, like the welcome and seldom-seen breaks in the weather, sometimes there are cracks in the overwhelming, stifling Islamism that is life in the Middle East. And in those brief moments, one can find something very different…hope, humanity, and life.

One of those sorts of days happened recently in my family’s home. I was sitting in my room that day, doing something on the computer, a typical day for me. Suddenly, my oldest brother came running into my room …he was out of breath, very out of the ordinary. My brother is close to my age and he doesn’t make it a habit to run around the house. I didn’t know what was going on, but I immediately smelled trouble, or at least something unusual.

He breathlessly told me that he just had a discussion with mom and dad about the Mo cartoon issue (this was earlier this year, when the cartoon story was still fresh). And he was upset, at my parents or maybe at all those Moslems who went crazy in the wake of the cartoons. Or perhaps he was angry at all of them.

So, after he caught his breath, he asked me a question. “Is it true that Mohammed got married to Aisha when she was 6?”

I looked at him for two seconds, amazed, thinking why he asked that now; I didn’t know at first how to respond. So I decided to gamble on telling him the truth, hoping he would respond in an intelligent way.

Carefully, I replied, “Yes, he got married to her when she was 6 and he was 54. He consummated his marriage with her when she was 9 and he was 57. There are a lot of Hadiths about that; I will email them to you tomorrow if you want.”

My brother’s answer to my revelation was suprising: “It’s wrong to be married to someone so young. That’s wrong!” and then he walked out.

To a westerner that reply might not mean much, but for a Moslem to say this, is big. Really big. I couldn’t believe my ears--my brother had just committed blasphemy. He had just questioned an act of Mohammed and judged it as wrong. So, according to the Koran, my brother is no longer a Moslem because the Koran says that the words of Mohammed are equal to those of Allah’s. So whatever Mohammed said and did in his life is as if Allah was doing it, and questioning any of that means you are an apostate.

I was happy, but I was thinking hard, wondering if this was somehow an opportunity. Was this the time to start the war in my home?…the war against Islam, the religion my folks revered, a ‘faith’ they are willing to die for.

I quickly decided I had to. I have to resist evil and strike back however I can, and I decided there was no better place to do it than among my own people. I thought I could use the same tactic the Moslems were using all over the world…attack from within.

That very moment, right after my brother left my room, and I had made my decision, I emailed him the Hadiths. Emailing my brother who lives in the same house with me may sound strange to you, but it’s actually the safest way to send him a message in private. It was still a risk because my brother and I didn’t get the chance to discuss it at length, so I wasn’t completely sure if he was ready for this sort of information. But I took that chance…because I am willing to take that much risk for what I believe in and when the time comes, maybe even more. And I believe in western civilization…I will do anything to protect it, because there’s hope in it, there’s light.

Just as I did that day, other infidels can do that too. Know about Islam, and the lives of Moslems, and when you get the chance, attack them with reason. Moslems are doing that to us all the time—we can use that tactic against them. And the facts, the truth is on our side! We can work individually but we need to be united in this purpose, today, right now. Just as Al Pacino says in “Any Given Sunday”, ‘Either we heal, NOW, as a team or we will die as individuals.’

I took a step forward by leaving the religion of barbarians but I knew that that was just the start. Now I am taking the next step by taking the fight to the Moslems themselves; I’m fighting among my own. Even among my own family. You can too…it is in your hands.

I see it like this. You can sleep in peace and comfort today, and pay the price later when you wake up in hell—and I am not talking about that hell that Satan lives in, but the hell that Islam intends to bring to the whole world soon. Or you can sacrifice your peace now and make sure that future generations will never have to fight. The choice is yours.

The weather in the world right now seems so hot and blazing. I wish we all see a day, a different day soon, when there’s hope, humanity, life and peace.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Edging towards another Final Solution…

One of today’s headline on my internet provider’s website was the following:

France shocked after brutal killing of a Jew.

The particulars of this undoubted hate crime goes something like this: On January 21st, a 23-year old innocent Jewish man, minding his own business somewhere in Paris, got lured into a trap by a woman. The unfortunate man was captured by a criminal gang, held for ransom, and tortured. He was being held in an apartment and cellar by several young African ‘youths’ (any guesses as to their religious background?) for several weeks. On February 13th, the Jewish man was found nearly dead (he died later enroute to hospital) near a Parisian train station - his body covered with burn injuries and wounds from obvious, repeated torture. I cannot imagine the agony that this poor man suffered in the last few weeks of his life, alone, totally cut off from the world, at the hands of brutal murderers.

These criminals (six men, and the previously mentioned woman) who had called themselves “the Barbarians” had also apparently demanded ransom from the victim’s family and also from the rabbi of a certain synagogue. They had been taking pictures – similar to the ones taken by Iraqi kidnappers – while torturing their victim with carpet knives and burning liquids. The photos will no doubt be very useful for the prosecution’s case.

The police investigation revealed that the gang had been trying to demand ransom from Jewish people on several other occasions.

The previously mentioned seven suspects have been taken into custody, while the gangleader – Youssouf Fofana (refering to himself as “Mohammed” and also “The brain of barbarians”) - seems to have escaped Europe to the Ivory Coast.

Now, a bunch of Moslem criminals held and tortured a Jewish man, and this criminal conspiracy included ransom attempts on the victim’s family and a Rabbi! Nor was this the first attempt. Can anyone tell me that religious motives had nothing to do with this? Can anyone tell me that these aptly-named Barbarians had actually misunderstood their so-called “religion of peace”? Or rather, were they acting precisely on and because of their religious beliefs?

Now, there is not much left to say other than: wake up Europe – it`s High Noon!

Toonophobia

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

The Kiss of Death

There are two photos that truly make me cringe. Bush kissing a Saudi Islamist Prince and Pope John Paul kissing the Koran. Turns my stomach, how about you? Click on images to enlarge, if you can stomach it.








It’s not in the Koran…it must be in the Jewran!

‘Liberal Moslem’—this term brings a smile on my face, and I really want to say it once more just for the heck of it—‘Liberal Moslem’. Sorry, couldn’t resist. We get comments from a lot of these ‘Liberal Moslems’ here at Pedestrian Infidel. Most of the time, they’re crappy and unremarkable. But there’s one comment that we got, which is a masterpiece of how a ‘Liberal Moslem’ talks and how he fools or tries to fool infidels into believing what he is preaching. It got and held my attention.

Well without further ado—let’s look at some claims he makes…if you know the Koran, you will laugh your butt off (don’t mind the grammar, he’s a Moslem from Turkey…I don’t think I need to say more).

‘The Governments make hard and violent canonical laws to create submissive communities. Otherwise, resort to violence and shed blood... And they call it to live islam! They call it religion.. According to them, in Islam nearly all thing are forbidden. Women are second class citizens and unimportant. Women have to use turban(to cover their hair).So many thing like these..But in Quran these prohibitions, forbiddens are not present. Quran does not order to women to cover their hair or any other places..All these superstitions are invented by crook muslim preachers.. Quran orders to know your god, be kindhearted, always share, always be clean and never lie. Ok? All of these!... Believe me.’

What the…I didn’t know women wore ‘turbans’, last time I checked, the Moslem women wore veils. And this is new too, ‘Quran does not order to women to cover their hair or any other places.’ That means they could go naked and that’d be fine by Allah … I’m sure some badass kinky mullahs in Turkey are preaching just that right now. Just to see how big a liar the above writer and other so called ‘Liberal Moslems’ are, we should look into the infamous ‘book of hatred’ and see this:
‘O Prophet! say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they let down upon them their over-garments; this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.’ (Allah is forgiving, merciful…yeah right!!!) Sura Al-Ahzab, verse 59 (Sura 33, verse 59).

And…

‘And say to the believing women that they cast down their looks and guard their private parts and do not display their ornaments except what appears thereof, and let them wear their head-coverings over their bosoms, and not display their ornaments except to their husbands or their fathers, or the fathers of their husbands, or their sons, or the sons of their husbands, or their brothers, or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their women, or those whom their right hands possess, or the male servants not having need (of women), or the children who have not attained knowledge of what is hidden of women; and let them not strike their feet so that what they hide of their ornaments may be known; and turn to Allah all of you, O believers! so that you may be successful.’ Sura Al-Noor, verse 31 (Sura 24, verse 31).

Holy Macro! What did I just read? I thought it was not in the Koran, I read some words like ‘But in Quran these prohibitions, forbiddens are not present. Quran does not order to women to cover their hair or any other places..All these superstitions are invented by crook muslim preachers.. Ok? All of these!... Believe me.’ But what is this that I read? Seems like it’s not the Koran, it must be the Jewran—you know, the Koran that the Jews made to fool everybody, including Allah (I don’t think Moslems get the sarcasm here).

Let’s move on…

‘Quran orders to know your god, be kindhearted, always share, always be clean and never lie. Ok? All of these!... Believe me.’
Uh huh…right, you are very true my friend. And no one follows the commands of peace and love in the Koran. Tell me one thing…what kind of a religion is it that no one is able to follow it? But since you have brought the peace issue up (not a new thing) let me answer that here…using the Koran. Among the 164 verses of ‘anti-peace’, I like the following 2 the best, I am sure other infidels agree with my feelings there.

‘So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.’ (Funny, slay all the infidels—Allah is most forgiving…laughing your butts off or what!) Sura Al-Tawba, verse 5 (Sura 9, verse 5)
Another one, to sum it all up…
‘Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.’ Sura Al-Tawba, verse 29 (Sura 9, verse 29).

Yes, this is exactly ‘kindhearted’…I can’t think of anything that could be more peaceful than killing people who don’t believe in what you believe…I mean that’s what the word peace actually means, maybe the Jews changed it in the dictionary…jewtionary!? Or maybe I am wrong again…maybe I don’t have a Koran with me…it is the Jewran again. The Jews, they’re so smart.

Look, if it is in there, it is in there. No matter how many times you lie, it is not going to make any difference, we know it, and you know it. And I said ‘lie’ because that’s what it is. The bullcrap about there being ‘Liberal Moslems’ is…well, bullcrap. That’s all it is. Liberal Moslems are more dangerous than fundamentalists because ‘liberal Moslems’ are also known as ‘backstabbing Moslems living among the westerners’. These are the guys that eventually will stand up and march forward leading the army of fanatical Moslems against the west.

Beware! Whatever I just said could be from the book, you know, the Jewran (duh!) This guy had some other things to say against the west, especially America … but I will write about it in another post.

Monday, February 20, 2006

When is the free world finally going to wake up to reality?

If this cartoon fiasco has shown us anything, it's shown us that the free world is in grave danger of losing its freedoms; indeed, we will lose our freedoms, one by one, one step at a time, if we don't finally wake up to the reality which is staring us in the face. The reality of Islam, the enemy. Islam is not only knocking at our door, but it has been let in, and it's now trying to destroy us, our civilization, and destroy all we stand for, for its own ultimate supremacy!

Since 9/11, our leaders have been kicking out garbage by the sackful ! They've been busy placating the electorate and appeasing the Muslims, by saying that Islam really is a moderate religion of peace and love. Tosh! Poppycock! Garbage! Baloney! Rubbish!

Islam is nothing of the kind. Islam, if it is anything at all, is a ferocious killer: It's a big huge roaring lion, not a tiny little meowing pussycat!

There is nothing loving or peaceful about Islam. History shows us this is so. To be loving and peaceful is not its nature. Islam is a proselytizing, conquering, bloodthirsty religion; and in the same way that a Muslim has to submit totally to Allah, we, the conquered, will have to submit to the will of the Muslim, too!

Till now, our politicians, with very few exceptions, have been totally unwilling to admit the truth: That Islam is the problem we face; Islam is the enemy.

As I was born after the end of World War II, I have witnessed nothing like this before in my lifetime. The West, though it is not yet willing to admit it, is in crisis. This crisis is similar to the crisis of the Thirties. The crisis of the Thirties was caused by the unrelenting rise of Nazi Germany, profoundly anti-Semitic, and its aggressive ambitions to dominate the world. This crisis is caused by the unrelenting rise of the Muslim world, also profoundly anti-Semitic, and its aggressive ambitions to dominate the world! This is déjà vu! We've been here before. We've seen it before. We've experienced it all before. Yet, seemingly, we have learnt nothing!

Isn't it peculiar: In the same way that people during the Thirties were reluctant to face up to the inevitability of war with Nazi Germany, so people today are every bit as reluctant to face up to the inevitability of war with Islam. Indeed, it is very difficult to see how war can be avoided if we wish to maintain our free way of life. Why? Because Muslims will not give an inch. They just will not budge. They have come to the West and demand that we change to accommodate them. This is an outrage! Outrageous behaviour often leads to outrageous outcomes. Beware!

There will be a big difference between the war we had to endure with Nazi Germany and this war if it comes about: That war was an inter-national war. The war we shall have to endure with Islam will be scattered all over the world, because Muslims are to be found all over the world. So we could very well end up fighting a civil war. In any case, it will be a nasty, bloody conflict. And remember this: When we do start to fight, all the Muslims living in the West will have their first loyalty, nay one could say only loyalty, to the Ummah. This war, ladies and gentlemen, will be brutal indeed! There is no war worse than a holy war!

During the 'Cold War', people used to speak of "reds under the bed" - the so-called fifth column within. During this 'War on Terror', people could easily start speaking of the "greens under the burqah"! But this war needs to be re-named. Our unwillingness to call it by its rightful name is tying our hands behind our backs.

It really is high time Bush and Blair, and all the other leaders here in the free world, woke up to the reality of the situation. It's already five to midnight, and we haven't identified the enemy yet! When are we finally going to wake up?

©Mark Alexander

Cross-posted to A New Dark Age Is Dawning

Mark is the author of the book, The Dawning of a New Dark Age: A Collection of Essays on Islam

This is how it was, 2006--Malaysia

Being a blogger, blogging from a (defacto) Islamic state like Malaysia, is a surreal experience. It can be difficult for those in the free world to understand, so I will try to elucidate. So this is my contribution for the "This is how it was" series.

Being a blogger in Malaysia on such a 'sensitive topic' like Islam is, to be honest, like being the only sane person in an insane asylum. Everyone around you is either unwilling or unable to see reality in its true form--they can only perceive a distorted misshapen sort of reality. But this 'alternate' reality is the one that everyone accepts as natural, and as true. For example, note the following typical viewpoint from the Malaysian media: "Why of course, those awful cartoons, how could they dare publish them? One must never insult Islam." Here in the Malaysian wing of the Islamic Insane Asylum, such thoughts are so natural, they just roll off the tongue. Any thoughts otherwise are not only unthinkable, they are inconcievable. Such is life with the inmates of Islam.

Of course, if I ever dare utter the truth openly, or anything else that does not fit the Official Line, I am quickly warned by my friends. "Quiet! Do you want to get in trouble?" To risk using a borderline hoary cliche, my existence here is a bit like the plotline from the first Matrix movie (the one good Matrix movie, I mean). In that movie, the main character realizes the truth, but it's such a dangerous truth that it totally undercuts not only the authority, but the very reality of society itself--its assumptions, its norms, its very foundations. It is exactly the same here in this corner of Dar al Islam, knowing as I know, that there can never be peace as long as there is Islam in the world.

I walk around the streets everyday, with this incredibly dangerous knowledge in my mind. No amount of posture or PC from the braindead local media, or government spin can erase what I know. So, it's best to keep it sealed carefully away, and this is what I do. It's what I have to do everyday here, just to function normally. Were it not for the net, I would have no outlet for such thinking at all. So for that, I am grateful.

Most Malaysians are very content to not think about politics, or religion. Since freedom of thought, religion, speech, or expression do not truly exist here, Malaysians by and large are happy leaving such thoughts on such 'sensitive topics' to those presumed to be the wise ones. People like the government, the kings, or the Barisan Nasional politicians (BN, or 'National Front', is the ruling party that has governed this country since Malaysia's independence from the UK in 1957). The great troubles of the world--Iran, Israel, Iraq, the bleeding sore that is "Palestine", even southern Thailand's festering Jihad--all seem comfortably far away from everyday Malaysian life.

"Let the politicians think about such things", most Malaysians will say. Surely, Islam cannot be responsible for any of the troubles in the world. Because the government and the government (Muslim) clerics say so, that's good enough for the average Malay on the street.

Many Americans had these same sorts of thoughts before 9-11. The world's troubles were seemingly far away, and that was comforting to know. Islam's involvement in virtually every war/terrorist incident in the world, was something not known by the average American before 9-11. It's not known to the average Malaysian, not even now. And even if it was, such facts would not be appreciated in its proper context. Certainly, there could be nothing intrinsically violent about Islam itself, or its teachings, right? Jihad, as they teach everyone in their Islamic studies classes (mandatory at all Malaysian government schools), is surely only a peaceful internal struggle for spiritual self improvement, right?

Malaysian society, by and large, is asleep to the dangers without and within. Most Malaysians may not pose much of a direct danger to Dar al Harb, but they won't resist Islam's Global Jihad either. If Israelis, Americans, and other free countries in this world want to preserve their free societies, you will not find any help here. And if that's true, they aren't going to find it in any other quarter of Dar al Islam, either.

Crossposted at Infidel Bloggers Alliance as part of the "This is how it was, 2006" series.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Europe In Denial: Gaddafi - Islam Will Rule Europe

If Europe continues down the dhimmi path it has chosen, Gaddafi may well be right.

Muammar Gaddafi: One Day Islam May Rule Europe

13 February 2006 | 20:03 | FOCUS News Agency



Tripoli. In his first public statement after the braking out of the scandal with the cartoons with Prophet Muhammad the Libyan Leader Col. Muammar Gaddafi announced that one day the Islam will disseminate its power over the European countries, the web edition of Libya Today reports.

In his statement Gaddafi calls those who had published the cartoons “slanderers who disseminate religious hatred”. He went on criticizing European schools that teach the children that the Muslim Prophet was not a messenger of Allah but a liar.
According to Gaddafi the riots in the poor suburbs of Paris last year were “only the beginning of the armed struggle of the Muslims against discrimination in Europe”. “Probably one day Europe will be subordinated to the Islam”, Col. Gaddapi claimed, cited by the publication.

The Islamic Concept of Peace

This was written by an anonymous writer ("a long-time resident in the Muslim world") a few years ago (Oct 2001). It's just as valid now as it was when it was first written (all emphasis therein is mine):

After much research and thought, I have come to understand the Islamic concept of peace as something like this:

Peace comes through submission (Islam).

This submission, of course, is submission to Muhammad and his concept of Allah in the Quran, in other words, Islam.

Theoretically, peace exists inside Dar ul-Islam, the House of Submission. I say theoretically, because we all know that Muslims, even though they are not supposed to, do fight fellow Muslims. The most recent examples are the civil war in Afghanistan between the Pushtuns on one side and the Northern Alliance (Uzbeks, Tajiks, etc.) on the other. Other recent exceptions were the Iraqi attack on Iran, the Iraqi attack on Kuwait, the West Pakistani attack on East Pakistan which subsequently became Bangladesh, the Yemeni Civil War with Egypt and Saudi Arabia interfering, the civil war in Algeria, the war between Morocco and Algeria over the Saharan Republic, etc.

Peace with pagans, that is, not the People of the Book, is impossible, as they are all to be given a chance to accept Islam or be killed. This is illustrated by the recent killing of pagans in the South Sudan by northern Muslims attempting to impose Islamic Law on them, the killing of non-Muslims in Northern Nigeria by Muslims attempting to impose Islamic law on them, the attacks of the northern Muslims on the southern pagans in Chad with Gaddafi interfering, etc.

With regard to Christians and Jews, they, too, are to be fought against until they are subdued and feel themselves subdued -- that is found in Quran 9:29 (Yousuf Ali). Illustrations of this are also in Sudan, Nigeria, Chad, Indonesia and smaller atrocities against Christians in Egypt, and the heinous repression of all Christian activity in Saudi Arabia by the Wahhabis.

Muslim have to fight on until there is "no more tumult or oppression" Quran 2:190-193, Q. 9:5 (Yousuf Ali).

To say that Islam is a religion of peace is not true. Islam is committed to war by both the example of Muhammad who fought on until he subdued Mecca and then other tribes, and by the Quranic teaching itself, plus numerous references in the Hadith.

Perhaps a quote from Amir Tahiri, the editor of Politique International of Paris would be illustrative of the current state of affairs. He says of the 30 wars going on at the present time (October 2001), 28 involve Muslim people fighting either non-Muslims or even other Muslims! The Quran, by the way, teaches that Muslims are never to initiate war. But Islam has a strange way of explaining this. For example, Muslims are supposed to offer non-Muslims an opportunity to embrace Islam. If the non-Muslims refuse, the Muslim thinking is that they have commited aggression against Allah and Islam. Therefore, the Muslim is allowed to fight these aggressors against Allah and Islam until they become Muslims or are killed.

Perhaps the greatest proof that Islam is not a religion of peace is the interpretion of Quran 4:89 that says if anyone wants to leave Islam (turns renegade) he is to be put to death. This makes it the religion of fear, not peace.

There will be war in the world as long as people believe in Muhammad, his example and his teaching.

The Islamic concept of peace, meaning making the whole world Muslim, is actually a mandate for war.

Saturday, February 18, 2006

Islam Means Terror - Verses You Have To Read

George Weinert at American Jihad has put together a remarkable collection of verses from the Quran and the Hadiths. Visit American Jihad to read them all but here are just a few:

TERROR = ISLAM!

Koran 8:67 "It is not fitting for any prophet to have prisoners until he has made a great slaughtered in the land."

KILL THEM ALL!

Tabari IX:42 "We have been dealt a situation from which there is no escape. You have seen what Muhammad has done. Arabs have submitted to him and we do not have the strength to fight. You know that no herd is safe from him. And no one even dares go outside for fear of being terrorized."

Slaughter = Terror = ISLAM!

Koran 7:3 "Little do you remember My warning. How many towns have We destroyed as a raid by night? Our punishment took them suddenly while they slept for their afternoon rest. Our terror came to them; Our punishment overtook them."

The True Muslim must Terrorize them all!

Bukhari:V9B87N127 "The Prophet said, 'I have been given the keys of eloquent speech and given victory with terror.'"

Khomeini on 'weird sex'

A man can have sex with animals such as sheeps, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine. From Khomeini's book, "Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990: (Never buy a Hamburger in Iran!)

SUBMIT to the MUSLIM TERROR!

Koran 33:60 "Truly, if the Hypocrites stir up sedition, if the agitators in the City do not desist, We shall urge you to go against them and set you over them. Then they will not be able to stay as your neighbors for any length of time. They shall have a curse on them. Whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain without mercy-a fierce slaughter-murdered, a horrible murdering."

And this is what is planned for the USA - NO MERCY FOR YOU AMERICA!

Tabari VIII:143 "In this year a twenty-four man raiding party led by Shuja went to the Banu Amir. He launched a raid on them and took camels and sheep. The shares of booty came to fifteen camels for each man. Also a raid led by Amr went to Dhat. He set out with fifteen men. He encountered a large force whom he summoned to Islam. They refused to respond so he killed all of them."


And so on and so on. There are literally thousands of these verses in the Hadiths. Whenever I read them, I think of John Esposito and David Forte, and I spit at them in my mind. For deceiving our leaders and the public about Islam.

Hey Malaysia--This Mo's for you


Offended? Fine by me. Now get over it and move on. If you have to react violently to something like this, as so many mohammadens (lower case intentional) are so wont to do, then you deserve whatever ISA dungeon may be awaiting you.

Case closed.

Former President Clinton Demands Criminal Punishment for Mockery of Islam and Mo

Since Muslims lie, we will have to wait for the specific statements. This may actually be a "fantasy" interpretation of what Clinton said by a Muslim writer. Several other sites do not believe Clinton would be that stupid. We'll see.

Clinton urges EU to convict publishers of caricatures

For Clinton, it is easy to sell the West for money and prestige in the Muslim world. Maybe he has converted to Islam. Imam Clinton issues fatwa - kill the mocking infidels!

ISLAMABAD: Former US president Bill Clinton on Friday condemned the publication of Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) caricatures by European newspapers and urged countries concerned to convict the publishers.
Talking to reporters after meeting Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz in Islamabad, Clinton said he disagreed with the caricatures and that the publication was against religious and ethical norms. Clinton said he had no objection to peaceful demonstrations being held worldwide, but this was not the time for violence. He said it was the time to promote inter-faith harmony and stand together on the issue.

He said the people’s religious convictions should be respected at all costs and the media should be disallowed to play with the religious sentiments of other faiths. He said the media could criticise any issue including governments and people, but nobody had the right to play with the sentiments of other faiths.

Clinton said people in the US had also condemned the publication and were deeply concerned over it. He said they respected Islam, as it was the fastest growing religion in the US. Clinton also called on President Pervez Musharraf and both men discussed the India-Pakistan peace process and Afghanistan’s peace and stabilisation process.......

Friday, February 17, 2006

Which do You Find Offensive?

The BNP has published the Momockery cartoons on their website back in early February. They also have now produced this flyer. We need a similar flyer with the following photos taken in New York at the Danish Embassy in the USA. Graphic Artists, get creative.

You can’t look at them…but raping them is OK

Since adult movies are not available here in Dubai and porn websites are blocked, one of my friends in college ordered some pornographic DVDs from the United States. He paid for it all up front, and he was told he’d get the package in about 14 days. He waited impatiently for the package…14 days passed by, and he didn’t get anything. But a week after that though, he got a tersely-worded letter from the UAE postal service saying something like, ‘Your package contained uncivilized material, which is illegal in the UAE’. So, just like that, all his precious porno DVDs had been confiscated by the UAE. Not only did he lose all that money, he was totally pissed off—so pissed off that he was jumping on and off the chair when he related the story to me.

Right when I heard the story, it hit me…what ‘civilization’ was the UAE postal service referring to? Are they talking about the Moslem ‘civilization’ that at best ignores (or often outright sanctions) the raping of non Moslem women by Moslem men? Of course, that’s the civilization that the UAE protects. But that’s not the worst of it, as oftentimes these same Moslem men then kill their rape victims after satiating themselves. This is a ‘civilization’ that considers all women (not just the kuffir ones) nothing more than toys. The UAE government that is trying to be so civilized here by censoring harmless pornographic materials has never come out and condemned these barbaric acts of violence and murder.

So, does this mean that, to a Moslem, the people who are protected by their so-called civilized laws are just Moslems, and not the non Moslems? Are non Moslems even considered humans? The UAE, the country that calls itself the most liberal Middle Eastern country, that welcomes the west, is always very quick to condemn the west for whatever it does. While the UAE never condemns the Moslems that go around killing and raping, they can quite easily point the finger at Western pornography, shouting ‘uncivilized!!’ These guys are so fast to condemn such an irrelevant thing, but they never condemn rape and murder committed by Moslems. Instead, if they ever do acknowledge Moslem crimes, such barbarity and violence is always rationalized by blaming it all on the West. Or especially the Jews,

So, in summary, Moslems never commit any crime, and why? Because they are Moslems—they’re never wrong!!

I knew this already, that in Islam the only humans are Moslems, that raping and murdering non Moslems is allowed and not condemned but this makes my beliefs against Islam even stronger…it is the everyday life that matters; political correctness just goes right out the window when you live and eat among them.

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Condi Gets a Thrashing - Let's Look At This Dhimmi's History

Today, at NRO, Andrew C. McCarthy wrote an excellent article 'Honey or Your Lying Eyes' about the mythical 'moderate Islam' that our leaders keep on insisting must be allowed to settle amongst us and we must accomodate and 'respect' them and even give them special privileges such as a ban on cartoons, or reserved prayer rooms, or the exclusion of pork from cafeterias where they are a 'substantial' minority.

In the article, he calls out in particular Condoleeza Rice or as we know her, Dhimmi Rice.

Qaradawi [an Egyptian TaqiyyaMaster us smart infidels know is our enemy, a wolf in sheeps clothing], it turns out, is not just a moderate. He is, in addition, "a respected scholar and religious leader worthy of the deepest respect." Says who? Says the State Department, that's who.

It was only last October, you see, when Alberto Fernandez, newly minted by Secretary Condoleezza Rice as director for public diplomacy at State's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, made one of his obligatory "live dialogue" appearances on Islamonline.net. After cooing about the new Iraqi constitution, taking pains to stress that it expressly "recognizes the role of Islam" (thanks in no small part to State's labors), Fernandez proceeded straight to the required gushing over Qaradawi.

But wait a second. Hasn't Qaradawi has been banned from the U.S. for promoting terrorism? Surely the State Department can mount a full-throated defense of that, right? After all, isn't our moral compass supposed to be the Bush Doctrine — the one that says "you're either with us or with the terrorists"? Is it really that hard for State to say Qaradawi is a disgusting character promoting a noxious agenda, rather than a model of moderation?

Apparently. Such a choice, our chic-sensitive public-diplomacy pirector opined, was "for the Muslim Umma to decide." As for the rest of us, Fernandez would brook no denying that it is "important to listen to intelligent and thoughtful voices from the region like Sheikh Qaradawi, ... an important figure that deserves our attention."


Criticism of Condi Rice is no stranger to Pedestrian Infidel. The problem with Rice, as the problem with Rice 3months ago, a year ago, or 4 years ago is that she refuses to read books critical of Islam. It would be wrong. Such is the pathetic life of a dhimmi.

Dhimwit Rice - "I am an Idiot and Proud of It! I love Islam !" Sept 2005

Waiter, There's a HI in my Rice Sept 2005

China--Peaceful Intentions?

While many pundits and governments in the world rightly focus their attention on Iraq, Iran, the Middle East, and Jihad-inspired terrorism, there is a power in Asia that is seeking its "place in the sun." This does not bode well for the future of peace in Asia or the world.

Consider what the People's Republic of China (PRC) has been up to recently:

--Beijing rammed an "Anti-Secession Law" through its rubber-stamp 'legislature' in 2005. This 'law' asserts its legal authority to employ "nonpeaceful means" against Taiwan should the island democracy take any steps toward independence.

--Along with Russia, China pressured Central Asian states to kick the U.S. out of bases there being used in the war on terrorism; U.S. forces had to vacate a supply hub in Uzbekistan as a result.

--China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) held its first-ever military exercise with Russia in 2005--an exercise transparently focused on combating the United States.

--China's military spending has gone up at least fifteen percent a year for the past six years. China continues to buy billions of dollars in Russian military equipment, and has agreed to buy billions more. China's annual military budget is a state secret, but estimates are that China spends $30 billion a year on its military build-up. This amount could actually be much closer to $100 billion annually when other military-related expeditures are included, such as military research, space activities (military communications and spy satellites) and investments in infrastructure (bases). There is apparently no enthusiasm in Beijing for reversing this trend any time soon.

--The PRC continues its massive campaign of industrial espionage intended to steal U.S. military and technological secrets. This immense spy program also targets US allies such as Japan, Australia, and in Europe.

--Beijing has been running a propaganda campaign, for over a decade, to make people aware of the importance of China getting some international respect, after a century of defeats and other humiliations. This resonates with many Chinese, and the government is exploiting this to build support for a larger military and more aggressive diplomacy.

--China pursues close relationships with repressive dictatorships in places like Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, and Iran. Except for Zimbabwe, all are countries, rich with oil, that China's ever-growing economy covets. In addition, in early 2006, China recently agreed to work even more closely with Saudi Arabia. When Saudi King Abdullah visited Beijing in January 2006, he inked some five agreements with Beijing, which call for closer cooperation in a number of areas, including (and especially) energy. The Chinese-Islamic axis that this sort of cooperation portends to constitutes yet another challenge to US interests. Is anyone in DC paying attention?

--The PLA did not fire, or even reprimand, a senior officer (holding the rank of major general) who publicly threatened to nuke "hundreds" of U.S. cities if the United States came to Taiwan’s defense. This would be China's reputed response to any US move to defend Taiwan (the democracy that the PRC steadfastly calls a 'renegade province') from a long-feared Chinese attack or outright invasion.

--China has also made it clear that it will not cooperate in the U.N. Security Council (UNSC) or elsewhere in taking firm steps against nuclear proliferation by Iran and North Korea. This includes the PRC protecting its allies in Teheran and Pyongyang from any UN sanctions, via its UNSC veto.

--The PRC has considerable political and economic leverage with North Korea, but has steadfastly refused to invoke it in order to force the North Koreans to end their nuclear weapons development program. Any NK mischief, so long as it antagonizes and distracts the US from progressing towards its goals, is undoubtedly very useful to the regime in Beijing.

--And, to add insult to injury, Chinese pressure successfully excluded the U.S. from an important Asia-Pacific summit meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia last December.

In conclusion, China may speak soothing rhetoric to the Western media about "cooperating with all countries", but its bellicose actions say otherwise. Clearly, these are not the actions of a country that is interested in peace. This is how wars get started.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Multiculturalism: The Dead Hand

Multiculturalism is much more than a joke on the West. It's a disease of the mind. Islam has proven that. As we watch our political elite wimper and cower at Islam and pressure the ignorant masses to defend Islam, many now sarcastically sneer at the political correctness and the groveling of our leaders. I'm talking about you, Al Gore, Condi Rice, Tony Blair, all the EU elites and that most craven of beasts, the MSM.

Over at the Brussels Journal, Joshua Trevino, has an excellent article about the death of multiculturalism. "The Dead Hand"

Multiculturalism is dead. It was always dead, in the sense that an untruth has no life, but the energies of a vigorous fraud are enough to deceive many for much time. The idea that differing value-systems could coexist within a superstructure, itself imposing equality upon them, was a tempting one: it affirmed a reassuring view of humanity, and more important, it relieved a West that did not believe in itself of the burden of self-assertion. Its lie was always obvious to those willing to think critically about it — what if the notionally subsidiary value-system struck against the value-system undergirding the arbitrating superstructure? — but now it is obvious to nearly all who have lived through the last five years of war and massacre, and seen its latest phase ignited by mere cartoons.

....
The other lesson of the “cartoon war” derives directly from the actions of the Danish imams — but we already saw it in the hate of the Finsbury Park Mosque, the violence of the Arab European League, and the flames of the French banlieues. Paul Belien said it best: “[W]hen a country has let in a Muslim minority it has let in the Muslim majority from the rest of the globe.” One only hopes that this lesson, driven home in Denmark, takes root elsewhere in Europe. Though made fresh by events, it is a lesson that long predates this affair:

[T]hat most precious possession of Western Man, freedom of thought and expression, is threatened by the spread of creeds which, claiming the privilege of tolerance when in the position of a minority, seek only to establish a position of power in which they can suppress and obliterate all views but their own.


The founders of the Mont Pelerin Society had Communism in mind when they drafted this a generation ago. It rings as true now that Islamism subverts the very societies in which it has found refuge. Will the threatened hosts learn? Will they act? There is no confidence in their self-defense; there is no sureness in their rectitude. Only one thing is sure: this is not over yet.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Should Israel be invited to NATO?

NATO membership for Israel? I came across this idea today in the Wall Street Journal, and it got my attention. Indeed, this may be the only effective strategy left on the table, short of war, to deter the mad mullahs in Iran from completing their barely-concealed nuclear weapons program.

The blog The Right Scale sums up a convincing argument for immediately admitting Israel to NATO:

The West has one ace left to play before a final showdown looms. Extending NATO membership to Israel could convince Iran’s Mullahs that developing a nuclear capability is not in their interest.

Israel meets NATO qualifications: it is a democracy, has a free market economy, and is able to contribute to the common defense. In fact, unlike many new NATO members, it would be a net addition to the alliance, having lift and logistics ability, a second-to-none officer corps, and a first-rate military capable of all aspects of war-fighting.

Israel’s intelligence capabilities have been a vital asset in prosecuting the Global War on Terror, as few understand the conflict so well. Like the U.S. and Great Britain, history has forced Israel into being a genuine warrior nation. Its accession to NATO could only enhance the alliance’s capabilities.

More importantly, Israeli accession to NATO would explicitly extend the Western alliance’s nuclear deterrent to cover Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Now it will be Tehran, and not the rest of the world, that has a proliferation problem. Any nuclear or conventional attack on Israel, be it direct or through proxies such as Hezbollah or other terrorist groups, would be met by a cataclysmic response from the West that would make the Battle of Omdurman look like a stroll in the park. [3]

Israel’s accession would leave the Mullahs with no illusions about the West’s determination to respond to Iran’s strategic threat to the region. NATO membership is the strongest disincentive to Tehran against its aspirations to join the nuclear club. Iran wants the bomb primarily to intimidate Israel into a lesser role in the Middle East and, in effect, to hold the West hostage to its desire for regional dominance. Extended deterrence, with its proven track record in the Cold War, remains the last, best chance to get the Iranians to back down. Israel’s joining NATO is undoubtedly the most effective way to resolve the crisis, short of immediate military action.

I hope someone in the White House or State Department is fast tracking this idea. Hopefully the arm twisting will start soon or has already started with our half-hearted European "allies" over at NATO HQ in Brussels. Europeans don't have a lot of love for the Israelis, so if they have to be shoved into an overnight NATO-Israel shotgun marriage kicking and screaming, so be it.

NATO has obviously been wandering aimlessly since the USSR imploded, searching for purpose and mission. Well, we've got a mission for you now, NATO. We all know who the enemies of democracy and the West are--this side of the blogosphere has known about the 'clear and present danger' we've been facing for some time now. It's very much a fact that Europe, the US, and the free world as a whole all have the same enemies, even if the Europeans are in denial about it most of the time.

It's high time NATO became relevant again. Admit Israel to NATO now.

Monday, February 13, 2006

Al Gore Promises Dhimmitude Dhimmicrats Submission At Jeddah Conference


Am I dreaming? Al Gore, today, pledged complete submission of America to Muslim Demands. It's a dream come true. A dhimmi leader of the dhimmicrats pledged today that he would work to fix things for Muslims - more immigration, more 'respect' for Islam, less surveillance rights, greater difficulty in arresting Muslim suspected of terrorist activities in the US. This is great. You can't make this up.


... he said that he and his Democratic Party colleagues have always opposed illegal detentions of Arabs and other people in the United States.

...

"Unfortunately there have been terrible abuses and it’s wrong,”

...

He also criticized the thoughtless manner in which visas for Arabs are now handled.

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Islam: The enemy of democracy and freedom!

Until 9/11, the western world was largely ignorant of the religion of Islam, of its goals, of its aspirations. Indeed, even since 9/11, most people, and that includes our politicians, would not score very highly in a test of their knowledge on the subject. It should be obvious to all thinking people that our politicians are actually unaware, dare I say blind, to the dangers that Islam will increasingly cause us. It is truly a case of the blind leading the blind! That means to say, uninformed and unthinking politicians leading an ill-informed electorate. But folks, this is what we have right now. The same can hardly be said of Muslims in the Islamic world, though; for their knowledge of Christianity far surpasses - even though much of their knowledge is quite distorted - any knowledge of Islam by the man in the street in the West.

As the old saying goes, knowledge is power. But what we often don't hear uttered is its converse: Ignorance is weakness!

The West is far weaker than it need be because of this ignorance of Islam, since Islam is our greatest enemy. The greatest enemy since Nazism and communism. I'll give you some good reasons why this is so. And none of them - absolutely none of them - are based on hatred!

Islam is the enemy of the West for a plethora of good, solid reasons, and if we wish to survive as a civilization, we are going to have to bite the bullet and deal, head on, with the issues these reasons raise. Let us begin...

First and foremost, we are dealing with a religion which does not recognize any separation of politics and religion, any separation of the political from the spiritual. For Muslims, life is one coherent whole: the political and spiritual both meld into one. This has always been so, and always will be. No re-classification of the religion into two separate parts is possible because of Islam's very nature.

In Islam, all power rests with Allah, the god of Muslims. The Qur'an, their holy book, is always taken literally. Those words are considered to be the actual words of Allah. Therefore, none of these words can be changed, for to change any of them would be tantamount to tampering with Allah's words. This would be a grave sin in their eyes.

For the same reason that the words contained in the Qur'an cannot be changed, they cannot, therefore, be re-interpreted either. So do not hold your breath for any kind of reformation in this religion, because it ain't gonna happen!

In Islam, all power rests with Allah, and it filters down via his vice-gerents on earth to the people. Hence the great desire among Muslims to restore the caliphate. Contrast this with the Western model of government!

In the West, the ideal political system is democracy. In democracy, all power rests with the people, and they exercise that power at the polls. In a democracy, all power filters in the opposite direction from Islam. In democracy it filters up; in Islam, down! Herein lies the greatest barrier to the miscibility of the two worlds: the western world and the Islamic world!

Without digressing too much here, I should like to add that this is the main reason why George W Bush and Blair's venture into Iraq to bring democracy there was a grave error of judgment. How can one bring democracy to a region of the world where the people who inhabit that region believe that all power rests with Allah, and where they believe that Allah has prescribed their way of life for them for then, for now, and for all time?

I would suggest that where such a dichotomy exists, the most sensible and prudent thing to do would be for us to lead our lives as we see fit, and for those people to be allowed to live their lives as they see fit. That way, there would be hope of some peace in this world.

But this is not what we have done. We have done the very opposite of this: We have entered the Middle East in the hope - the vain hope in my opinion - of bringing our way of doing things, our way of life, to them; furthermore, we have allowed millions and millions of Muslims into the West - and at the very time when Christianity, the religion which underpins the West, is greatly weakened anyway - which will only give us headaches for the years ahead. Why? Because Muslims who immigrate bring their hopes and dreams and aspirations with them of establishing Islam everywhere on earth. To Islamize the world is the main aspiration of the Muslim; and we have seen these past weeks, the manifestation of aggression in its cause in France. For what happened in France was in no small part because of the Muslim's desire to establish Allah's caliphate here on earth. These were the first rumblings, the first roar of the lion! Expect more of this in the future, as Islam grows stronger and stronger.

Muslims, by and large, do not respect non-Muslims. How can they? Their religion does not allow them to do so. Their religion preaches that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims; indeed, they use the derogatory term infidel for us. This word to some Westerners might simply mean that they call us infidels because we are people who do not subscribe to their faith. This, after all, would be quite logical, since to us it simply means not fidele, or not true to the faith. But this does not completely describe what Muslims mean by this term. To Muslims, to be called an infidel is an insult indeed! It has connotations of inferiority, backwardness, and even uncleanness!

You see, Muslims believe that Islam is the perfection of religion for man for all time. They call it ad deen al kamal, the perfect religion. People, in their eyes, who have not yet submitted to the will of Allah, are in a state of pre-Islamic chaos, a state known to them as Jahiliyyah! To Muslims, all Muslims, the whole world is classified in two parts: that part of the world which has submitted, and is therefore in the Islamic state, known as Dar al Islam, and that part of the world which has yet to submit, and is therefore in a pre-Islamic, chaotic, jahiliyyic state, known as Dar al Harb, or the House of War!

The House of War is the part of the world which has yet to be taken over, and must at some point be taken over in the future. We, I am sorry to inform you, are in the House of War. So we can expect anything at anytime.

Some people would ask why we were able to go for quite a long time without problems with Muslims. The answer to that is a simple one indeed. First of all, there were relatively few Muslims living in the West, so the ones that did live here were not powerful. Secondly, Muslims living in the Islamic world were, for the most part and for many years, poor by anyone's standards. This all changed with the Oil Embargo of the 70s - a time when the price of oil on the world markets soared. As a result of this, the Islamic world became rich and empowered. Money is power; and it talks loudly! In recent years we have seen evidence aplenty of Islam being on the move. I tell you now: If we do not find a way of clipping its wings here in the West, we shall lose our democracy, and we shall be in deep, deep trouble.

So the trouble we will have with Muslims will not come only from without, but in the future we can expect trouble from the Muslims within. The millions of Muslims living here in the West will not integrate, because it is not in their worldview to do so. It is also forbidden them by their very own Prophet Himself, the Prophet Muhammad. He forbade Muslims even to befriend infidels. He also exhorted them to kill us. And he certainly told them that they should live separate lives, and dress and behave differently, so that they could easily tell themselves apart.

No Western politician is going to be able to change these facts. For facts they are indeed. Moreover, as Islam will grow here, their numbers will become greater and greater, and they will be able to use our democratic system to outvote us and introduce their form of government based as it is on their beloved Shariah, or quranic laws! How do you propose we shall be able to stop them? We shall be outnumbered, and as the outcome of democratic elections depends on the number of votes cast, we shall be able to do nothing about it! This time will come quicker than we might think, because so few babies are being born to infidel families.

The only thing left for people to do, will be to fight. Inevitably, at some point, civil war will ensue. If the political process fails people, then this will be all that will be left for them: civil war, guerre civile, Bürgerkrieg, call it what you will.

But one thing I can assure you, no politicians' sweet talk, posturing, or manœvring, will get us out of this one without conflict at some point in the future.

You see, one of the biggest problems for the West is its devotion to the concept of freedom of religion. This is a lofty concept and ideal indeed; but this devotion blinds people to one important reality: Islam is not just a religion, but a political system also. Indeed, it is more of a political system than anything else, and it is, in addition, a political system diametrically opposed to our own. It abhorrs freedom of choice, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of anything that we so cherish! The only thing one is free to do in Islam is become a Muslim, and submit to the will of Allah!

These two systems are totally immiscible, and unfortunately, we have imported this immiscibility right into the heart of the West! To our own great disadvantage, and to the disadvantage of our long term peace and security. What, I ask you, will the Americans do when the ever growing Muslim population in America starts wanting to tinker with the Americans' beloved Constitution? When Muslims will see their way clear to supplant the Constitution with Shariah law?

Questions like these are the ones we should be grappling with NOW. To wait until the time comes would be foolish indeed.

Wake up to the harsh realities of life in the twenty-first century! We've got some collective thinking to do if we wish to save ourselves from darkness! Perhaps we shall, indeed, be forced to think about having to re-classify Islam as a political system first and foremost, a political system immiscible with our own, and one whose advance needs to be forestalled. This may be one of our only sensible alternatives. Since to give complete, unhampered freedom to Islam to grow here in the West is tantamount to digging our own graves!

©Mark Alexander

Mark Alexander is the author of The Dawning of a New Dark Age