Thursday, November 30, 2006

Satan's Islam and Biblical Prophecy

Prophet of Doom has one of the best analysis of the Quran on the web. It has been a while since I studied the Quran and its context. Without context, the Quran is just a rambling rant of an evil monster. I was reading Chapter 7 The Elevated Places and POD's analysis. I was struck by this final statement by POD -

But he was right in a way. When the Bible spoke of Satan, it said that he would use prostration, taxation, terror, a new gospel, and a boastful false prophet to deceive mankind.


Isn't that amazing. Islam is Satan's grand plan. Mohamed is Satan pretending to be a prophet of God fighting Satan, creating a new gospel where evil is righteous. Even if you are secular and indifferent to religion in general, it is more than coincidence. If you really don't believe in religion, can you dismiss this in its entirety without a lingering doubt? The only thing left out is the 'parade of fools' among the infidels who simply will not and cannot admit the evil that Islam is and recognize its threat to our very existence. All non-Muslims must join forces to fight Islam. Even if you are a solid atheist, your life and your freedom are in danger.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Another sham ally--Yemen

Surprise, it's another Muslim 'ally', a supposed 'friend' of the west and (at best) a nominal ally in the "War on Terror", that is in reality very hostile to Enlightenment Values. Imagine that, a Muslim country that's more loyal to Seventh Century (i.e. Islamic) values than to Kafir ones.

Today's sham ally is Yemen (yes, the same country that brought the world the attack on the USS Cole, and the bin Laden family hails from this despicable place). Here's what these bastards have been up to lately:

Yemeni journalist imprisoned for defaming Islam

A Yemeni newspaper editor has begun serving a year in prison for reprinting the Danish cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.Kamal al-Aalafi, the editor, said the verdict “takes Yemen back to totalitarian rule, contradicts freedom of expression, and represents a real violation of democracy and freedom of the press,” he told reporters.

The court that handed down the sentence also ordered the closure for six months of al-Aalafi’s Al-Ra’i al-Am independent weekly and forbade the editor from writing for the same period.

Al-Aalafi was transferred to prison immediately after sentencing – to the shock of fellow journalists and human rights activists who attended the court session.
...
At least 100 journalists in Yemen have faced various forms of harassment over the past year, ranging from beatings and arrests to kidnappings and a letter-bombing that wounded a newspaper editor...

With 'friends' like Yemen, who needs enemies?

Long overdue

Today I found this open letter, which discusses the urgent need for the creation of an anti-islamofascism movement. This is long, long overdue. I hope it is not too late. Read the memo, spread the word, and see if you can help.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

It's official--Israel caves on Corporal Shalit

As I had long feared, Olmert has officially raised the white flag on Corporal Shalit's kidnapping. Apparently, even living in close proximity to barbarians dedicated to your destruction is not enough to prevent suicidal self-delusion like this:

Israel Ready To Swap Palestinian Prisoners For Gilad Shalit

(RTTNews) - Amidst the uneasy day-old Gaza truce, the Israeli PrimeMinister Ehud Olmert has said that Israel was prepared to release manyPalestinian prisoners, including long-serving inmates, in return for Gilad Shalit, a soldier Palestinian militants abducted last June.

Olmert said he was reaching out to the Palestinians for peace, offeringa series of humanitarian and economic incentives if violence against Israel ceased. However he conditioned any resumption of peace talks on the soldier's release and acceptance by any future Palestinian unitygovernment of an international demand to renounce violence, recognize Israel and accept existing interim peace accords.

"With Gilad Shalit's release and his safe return to his family, theIsraeli government will be willing to release many Palestinian prisoners, even those who have been sentenced to lengthy terms,'' Olmertsaid.

It was the first time that Olmert had specially spoken of exchanging prisoners for Shalit, whose capture in a cross-border raid byPalestinian militants triggered a five month old Israeli offensive into the Gaza Strip.

Olmert was speaking a day after a truce took effect in Gaza, aimed atending Israeli offensive, ending rocket fire into Israel by Palestinianmilitants and as a step to reviving peace talks that collapsed in 2000 before the start of a Palestinian uprising.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Moderate Muslim website?

I'm curious as to what our readers, the few of you out there, have to say about this website:

Arabs for Israel

Is this site genuine? Is this taqiyya? Can a Muslim still be a Muslim and recognize and respect the "Zionist entity'? Or does this make the Muslim an automatic apostate and traitor?

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Malaysian Meltdown

Here's an insightful column from an Aussie journalist, who is smart enough to see past the Malaysian propaganda that all is not well in the Melayu Islamic State. The only real question, one not specifically addressed by this piece is this--is Islam a contributing factor to the Malaysian meltdown?

Read and draw your own conclusions.

While Malaysia fiddles, its opportunities are running dry

Michael Backman
The Age

MALAYSIA'S been at it again, arguing about what proportion of the economy each of its two main races — the Malays and the Chinese — owns. It's an argument that's been running for 40 years. That wealth and race are not synonymous is important for national cohesion, but really it's time Malaysia grew up.

It's a tough world out there and there can be little sympathy for a country that prefers to argue about how to divide wealth rather than get on with the job of creating it.

The long-held aim is for 30 per cent of corporate equity to be in Malay hands, but the figure that the Government uses to justify handing over huge swathes of public companies to Malays but not to other races is absurd. It bases its figure on equity valued, not at market value, but at par value.

Many shares have a par value of say $1 but a market value of $12. And so the Government figure (18.9 per cent is the most recent figure) is a gross underestimate. Last month a paper by a researcher at a local think-tank came up with a figure of 45 per cent based on actual stock prices. All hell broke loose. The paper was withdrawn and the researcher resigned in protest. Part of the problem is that he is Chinese.

"Malaysia boleh!" is Malaysia's national catch cry. It translates to "Malaysia can!" and Malaysia certainly can. Few countries are as good at wasting money. It is richly endowed with natural resources and the national obsession seems to be to extract these, sell them off and then collectively spray the proceeds up against the wall.

This all happens in the context of Malaysia's grossly inflated sense of its place in the world.Most Malaysians are convinced that the eyes of the world are on their country and that their leaders are world figures. This is thanks to Malaysia's tame media and the bravado of former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad. The truth is, few people on the streets of London or New York could point to Malaysia on a map much less name its prime minister or capital city.

As if to make this point, a recent episode of The Simpsons features a newsreader trying to announce that a tidal wave had hit some place called Kuala Lumpur. He couldn't pronounce the city's name and so made up one, as if no-one cared anyway. But the joke was on the script writers — Kuala Lumpur is inland.

Petronas, the national oil company is well run, particularly when compared to the disaster that passes for a national oil company in neighbouring Indonesia. But in some respects, this is Malaysia's problem. The very success of Petronas means that it is used to underwrite all manner of excess.

The KLCC development in central Kuala Lumpur is an example. It includes the Twin Towers, the tallest buildings in the world when they were built, which was their point.

It certainly wasn't that there was an office shortage in Kuala Lumpur — there wasn't.

Malaysians are very proud of these towers. Goodness knows why. They had little to do with them. The money for them came out of the ground and the engineering was contracted out to South Korean companies. They don't even run the shopping centre that's beneath them. That's handled by Australia's Westfield.

Next year, a Malaysian astronaut will go into space aboard a Russian rocket — the first Malay in space. And the cost? $RM95 million ($A34.3 million), to be footed by Malaysian taxpayers. The Science and Technology Minister has said that a moon landing in 2020 is the next target, aboard a US flight. There's no indication of what the Americans will charge for this, assuming there's even a chance that they will consider it. But what is Malaysia getting by using the space programs of others as a taxi service? There are no obvious technical benefits, but no doubt Malaysians will be told once again, that they are "boleh". The trouble is, they're not. It's not their space program.

Back in July, the Government announced that it would spend $RM490 million on a sports complex near the London Olympics site so that Malaysian athletes can train there and "get used to cold weather".But the summer Olympics are held in the summer.So what is the complex's real purpose? The dozens of goodwill missions by ministers and bureaucrats to London to check on the centre's construction and then on the athletes while they train might provide a clue.

Bank bale outs, a formula one racing track, an entire new capital city — Petronas has paid for them all. It's been an orgy of nonsense that Malaysia can ill afford.Why? Because Malaysia's oil will run out in about 19 years. As it is, Malaysia will become a net oil importer in 2011 — that's just five years away.

So it's in this context that the latest debate about race and wealth is so sad.

It is time to move on, time to prepare the economy for life after oil. But, like Nero fiddling while Rome burned, the Malaysian Government is more interested in stunts like sending a Malaysian into space when Malaysia's inadequate schools could have done with the cash, and arguing about wealth distribution using transparently ridiculous statistics.

That's not Malaysia "boleh", that's Malaysia "bodoh" (stupid).

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Muslims spread religious hysteria

A Muslim woman here in the glorious Melayu Islamic Republic got caught spreading lies about a supposed mass conversion ceremony of Muslims becoming Christians. Allah forbid such horrors! Who would do such a thing? Everyone knows that such atrocities are illegal.

MALAYSIAN police said yesterday they have arrested a woman who had allegedly used SMS messages to spread false information about the baptism of Muslim Malays as Christians.

...

The mobile-phone text messages, allegedly originating from a person named Raja Sherina, sparked religious tension in Ipoh earlier this month. Some 1,000 Muslim Malays protested outside a Catholic church where the conversions were expected to take place. However, the crowd dispersed after learning that the ceremony was actually for about 100 ethnic Indian Catholics who were receiving their first Communion.

The case was the latest in a spate of recent incidents that have raised concerns about race relations in the country. Religious conversion is a thorny subject in majority-Muslim Malaysia, where Muslims are not allowed to convert. Proselytising of Muslims by other faiths is also prohibited.

...

There was also concern about the role in the case of the Perak Mufti (senior Islamic cleric), who owned up to being partly responsible for the spread of the SMS messages. He told the media that the woman, a graduate of the International Islamic University of Malaysia and the Al-Azhar University in Cairo, had conveyed information to him about the supposed baptism of Muslims at the Church of Our Lady of Lourdes in Silibin.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

The Rising Giant

This post started as a comment to one ‘Anonymous’ on my recent post on Indonesia, who made the rather incredulous suggestion that the North Koreans either might be thinking about or be actually capable of intervening militarily in Southeast Asia, my neck of the globe. Excuse me, what did you say? The Norks are in no condition to be contemplating any major military adventures past their own borders, let alone here in SE Asia!

Quite simply, the Norks are short of everything to run a proper war--fuel, ammo, spare parts and even food for their soldiers. Training and leadership for their forces is likely as ossified and ineffective as the rest of their ruling regime. The DPRK military is only capable of getting a lot of people near (or in) their gulag criminal state killed.

The Norks know this and have admitted as much, by pouring so much of their meager resources into their nukes program. It's tacit admission to the whole world that Nork’s conventional forces—be it tanks, artillery, etc—just don’t cut it anymore. Lil’ Kim is laser-like focused on one thing and one thing only—the survival of his regime. Nukes can do precisely that—obsolete and ineffective conventional armies don’t.

Don’t get me wrong—Lil’ Kim can and certainly is capable of causing mischief in many corners of the world. Mischief like selling counterfeit US greenbacks, narcotics, and nuke and missile technologies. All available to anyone, no questions asked, on cash terms only. Mischief yes; serious military threat, no.

So, who would have the reason and the capability to militarily intervene in SE Asia, other than the US? Japan and Australia, certainly, but their forces are relatively small, both countries have ample political reason to avoid lengthy military entanglements in the area, and furthermore, both are close allies of the US. Then there's India, but India also is falling into the US club now, as the US and India increasingly need each other.

This leaves China, the ever-rising East Asian giant. China has two powerful reasons to be tempted into a sizable SE Asia military incursion. Number one is to secure access to natural resources. SE Asia's got ‘em, and China needs all manner of resources to continue their economic and industrial development. For now, they can peacefully obtain pretty much whatever they need. But what would China do in some future crisis, if this access was threatened or cut off altogether?

The second motivating factor for potential Chinese meddling in Southeast Asia would be the treatment/oppression of the Chinese minorities that already reside there. Malaysia and Indonesia, in particular, have important, well-connected and well-monied Chinese minority populations. Both groups have been the repeated and continued targets of bigotry, oppression, second-class treatment, and occasional wide-scale murder, all at the hands of the more numerous Muslim neighbors. Anti-Chinese violence is certainly nothing new to this part of the world—it happened in 1964 (Singapore), 1965 (Indonesia), 1969 (Malaysia), and 1998 (Indonesia). In fact, the Muslim watchword seems to be, “Always blame the Jews… but if they aren’t readily at hand, go after the Chinese instead.”

Then there’s China’s arms build-up to consider. China is spending and has been spending considerable sums to upgrade its armed forces in all areas. This includes more realistic and intensive training, serious ongoing efforts to increase the professionalism of its military cadres, as well as massive programs to acquire advanced weapons. Such changes, once implemented, could allow the PRC to possess, for the first time, military forces that can operate for sustained periods at great distances outside of their own borders. Taiwan is but a hop, skip and a jump off the PRC coastline. There is another purpose, in particular, for the precipitous buildup of China’s navy… and the reasons for that lie south.

But there’s more than just better hardware and military training to consider. Chinese education and government propaganda have, for decades, consistently stressed a high degree of patriotic feeling in the PRC, and the need for the PRC to secure its rightful place in the world as a major power. And China sees Southeast Asia as falling within its rightful sphere of influence. They always have.

So, when the next wave of anti-Chinese riots sweeps through Kuala Lumpur and/or Jakarta, will China merely stand idly by, confining its activities to holding press conferences in Beijing or issuing communiqués from the UN Security Council in New York? Or, will the PRC act and act decisively?

How can we expect a ruling Communist dictatorship to act in such a time of crisis, a government that is fixated, quite like the Bismarck’s Second Reich, on securing the ‘Middle Kingdom’s’ ‘place in the sun’? Bear in mind, of course, that China has a more, shall we say, strenuous attitude on how to deal with terrorists and troublemakers in general. Just ask the Muslims in western China.

I wonder, which of these scenarios would the Javanese Islamists prefer? Would they prefer to keep seeing the ‘evil’ George Bush’s hospital ships parked in Indonesian waters, dispensing free health care to the Muslim masses? Or would they rather witness an approaching heavily armed PRC task force, loaded to the gunwales with weapons and troops, coming to the rescue of their besieged fellow Chinese?

(Read my post from earlier this year to read more about China and their not-so-friendly ways)

Monday, November 20, 2006

Ungrateful Bastards

ungrateful Indonesian bastardsUS Decider-in-Chief George ‘Walter’ Bush is visiting “moderate” Indonesia, a land where seething Islamic idiocy is boiling just under the surface. And sometimes- more and more often it seems- that idiocy is on full-frontal mode.

Today’s reminder of the Indo-Islamic Insane Asylum was the usual and predictable cauldron of anti-American sentiment Bush had waiting for him:

…Bush drew a different reaction Sunday at his upcoming stop in Indonesia, where thousands angrily protested America's policy in the Middle East and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

While President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono is a close U.S. ally in the war on terror, Bush is highly unpopular in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation.


Here’s something those ungrateful Indonesian bastards should try to keep in mind as they go stark raving mad (yet again) with Bush Derangement Syndrome…free medical care given to the masses of the poor in their miserable country, courtesy of the evil imperialist US military, to the tune of over $17 million this year alone:

Earlier this year, the (US Navy Hospital ship) Mercy spent six months in Indonesia, treating 61,000 patients. Most of the Indonesians received some medicine, or some dental work. But about two percent involved some surgery. As a result of the Mercy's visit, favorable attitudes towards the U.S. by Indonesians doubled (to 30 percent, so more work is needed.) The Indonesians were getting American quality medicine, which explains the average cost for treating each patient; $280.


61,000 Indonesians times $280 equals $17,080,000.

That’s right America…here are your tax dollars again at work, underwriting medical care for poor Muslims who still end up hating us. Now the Indonesian people, by these figures, are ‘only’ 70% anti-American. But if the US Government can’t scrape up enough resources to keep sending back the medics, the ‘disapproval rating’ is sure to creep up again.

Can you say ‘jizya’, folks?

Sunday, November 19, 2006

Holding Islam to Account

Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. He maintains a website at Amil Imani.

Here's a fine column Mr. Imani recently posted at FaithFreedom.org. (hat tip to the ubiquitous wits0)

Islam has spawned many sects that are master practitioners of the art of double standards. As far as Muslims are concerned what is good for Muslims is not good for the non-Muslims; and, what is bad for Muslims is good for non-Muslims.

What complicates matters is that there is no way of knowing which of the dozens of at-each-other’s-throat sects is the legitimate Islam. As sooner as Muhammad died his religion of peace became a house of internal war: jockeying for power and leadership started, sects formed and splintered into sub-sects, and bloodletting began in earnest.

The internal infighting in Islam is presently playing in full color—in red—most dramatically, in the Iraqi theater. Shiite raid Sunni civilians, slaughter them like sheep, and toss their bodies like trash in the streets or the rivers. The Sunnis return the favor with just as much viciousness and savagery.

Question: if this is the way these Muslims treat each other, how would they deal with the infidels, when they have the chance? Answer: these devoted followers of Muhammad would deal with the infidels exactly the way Muhammad did: behead the non-believers, take them as slave to hold or sell, or make them pay back-breaking jazyyeh—pole taxes.

Some may objects that writings like this are little more than hatemongering and fanning the fire that rages between Islam and the non-Islamic world. They may further flash the Islamic apologists’ few well-worn-out propaganda cards as evidence for their contention that Islam is not what its detractors claim.

Here are the few favorite cards:

* There is no compulsion in religion says the Quran—the full context is never shown.
* “Islam,” means “Peace,” so Islam is religion of peace.
* “For you, your religion, and for me, my religion,” Muhammad reportedly has said.

The Muslims and their apologists quickly run out of their few cards and the rest of the Islamic deck is all about intolerance, hatred, and violence toward the infidels and all others who are not true Muslims, even toward those who consider themselves as Muslims. Shiites, for instance, judge the Sunnis as traitors to Islam and Sunnis condemn the Shiites as heretics. Each side deems the other worthy of death and hellfire.

This internecine Islamic war of the religion of peace is not confined to the Shiite-Sunni divide. There are so many internal divisions within each side that listing and describing them comprehensively would be encyclopedic.

So, who is right? What are the facts about Islam and how does Islam impact the ever-shrinking village earth and its inhabitants? Admittedly, this is a huge question and cannot be answered satisfactorily in one article. However, some facts can be presented to help the reader decide.

There is no need to belabor the point that Islam is not and has never been a religion of peace. The word “Islam,” is derived from “taslim,” which means “submission,” while the term for “peace,” is “Solh.” Another derivation of the word “taslim,” is “salamat” which means “good health,” and so on.

Irrespective of what the term “Islam” may mean, the facts on the ground conclusively demonstrate Islam’s violent nature from its very inception. No need to go back to the time of Muhammad and examine the historical records. Just a few from contemporary events should make the point.

Here is a partial list: the savage Shiites-Sunnis bloodletting in Iraq; the barbarism of the resurging Taliban in Afghanistan; the genocide in Sudan’s Darfur; the Somalis killings; the Iranian mullahs murder of their own people and support of mischief abroad; the cross-border attack on Israel by Lebanese Hizbollah; the incessant terrorist acts of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Fatwa of the Palestinians against Israel; the bombing of Shiites mosques in Pakistan and the Shiites retaliation against easy innocent civilian targets.

Clearly, there is no place on the planet where Muslims reside that is in peace from the religion of peace. Spain, France, Holland, England Thailand, and Indonesia, have already been attacked while others such as Belgium have been threatened and sanctioned.

Stretching the benefit of the doubt beyond limits, one may believe that all these acts of horrors are committed by a small minority of thugs and radicals who happened to be Muslims.

Fine, let us ignore all those “fringes” for now: those who are giving Islam a bad reputation. And never mind Saudi Arabia, the cradle of barbarism fixed in formaldehyde since Islam’s inception. Also, let us overlook the dastardly Shiite fanatics presently ruling (ruining) a great nation of Iran. Iran Shiite Hitlerists are hell-bent on wiping Israel off the face of the planet while viciously devastating Iran’s own largest minority—the Baha’is; the people universally-recognized as law-abiding and peaceful.

Would someone account for what is happening in the “civilized” Islamic country of Egypt? The world owes Egypt a debt of gratitude for giving it the Muslims Brotherhood—the lead promoter of Sunni hatred toward the infidels with chapters and front organizations in much of the world. With typical Islamic hypocrisy, the Egyptian government claims that the Muslims Brotherhood is outlawed, when in actuality the Brotherhood holds twenty-five percent of the seats in the Egyptian parliament. The same country that gave the world vicious American killers like Al Zawahiri is the recipient of huge largess from the American taxpayer.

And the latest shameful action of the Egyptian government is the issuance of identity cards that requires listing of one’s religion. In order to be issued an ID card which is essential for just about any and all exercises of the rights of citizenship, the individual must list his religion as one of the three sanctioned faith: Islam, Christianity, or Judaism. No one is allowed to leave the religious affiliation blank or list any other religion. Buddhists, Hindus, Baha’is or agnostics and atheists have to either lie and fake a religious affiliation or run the serious risk of having to survive as non-entities in the “crown jewel” of modern and moderate Islamic society.

These are the conditions on the ground wherever Islam rules. Violence of all forms is endemic to Islam and is not confined to any fringes. Islam itself is the fringe. A fringe that is oppressive, hateful of others and violent to the core.

The world must confront Islam and demand that it mends its ways in conformity with the Bill of Rights, where every man, woman, and child is fully entitled to equal treatment under the law, irrespective of any and all considerations.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

McDonald's Goes Muslim and Halal. Where's PETA?

In Australia, if you go to these McDonald's you have to eat halal meat. Does McDonald's know what 'halal' butchery means. It is a barbaric way to kill a cow, totally stupid (see Stupid Islam below.) Where's PETA? Why aren't they up in arms about this? Western butcher techniques are far more humane and PETA is up in arms about that. So why the silence about the grotesque hilal butchering of cows? And why must I, as a person who despises Islam, not be informed that the cow my burger came from was blessed in the name of Islam, which wants to kill me (since I don't plant to convert but fight)? OK McDonald's, fine, I won't eat at your restaurant any longer.

SUNDAY HERALD - AUSTRALIA

Muslim Mac attack Kelvin Healey



McDONALD'S latest bid to attract more customers -- Muslim fast-food lovers -- has caused uproar among customers.

The fast-food chain has introduced halal products at two Melbourne restaurants, significantly boosting sales.
However some non-Muslim customers are furious they were not told their hamburger meat was slaughtered and blessed in accordance with Islamic rules laid down in the Koran.

McDonald's consulted Muslim leaders before introducing halal products at its Brunswick East and St Albans stores.

Halal meat is from animals that have been killed facing Mecca and blessed using the name of Allah.

Brunswick East store assistant manager Nicholas Yacoub said the move had attracted a surge of new customers.

"It has pretty much doubled our sales," Mr Yacoub said.

The store does not tell drive-through customers about the change and has only one small sign inside advertising the move.

Coburg resident Miriam McLennan was stunned to discover the hamburger she bought from the Brunswick East store was blessed.

"Just as a Muslim would not want to eat anything that isn't halal . . . I should have my rights to eat normal, ordinary food that hasn't been blessed," she said.

A Catholic Church spokesman said non-Muslims deserved to know if the food was halal before buying. But he said there was no biblical reason for Christians to avoid halal food.

A McDonald's spokeswoman said customers who did not want halal food should buy from any of its other stores.

Islam Is The Stupidest Religion on Earth

Islam is the stupidest religion on earth. Bar none. So lame, Islam is taking a dump on Earth and apparently we seem to tolerate, even praise it.

Let's look at some of the 'stupid is as stupid does' Islam did this week. In Amsterdam, Islam got all upset about the planned burqa ban. Don't they know that is how Islam keeps its women stupid. In Pakistan, the 'islamist' parties (read terrorist parties) demand Musharaff be deposed (guess how)? Musharaff pushed through some reforms of the criminal mistreatment of women raped and abused. Keep them stupid and obedient and needy. In Iran, they have even segregated women across all universities - can't be in the same room as men. They have also segregated parks. Best to keep everyone stupid. And yet, would anyone point out any mainstream 'indepth look' at Islam that has pointed it out as stupid. No?

If the West loses this war, it will because of the self denial. I look ahead of me and see an accident. Do I pretend that did not happen and take precaution? It is really something else, this state of denial is making us stupid. At least those who remain in denial.

The media is not pressured into deceiving the citizens about Islam. There's no government machine in the US at least saying keep it sweet. No, they aggressively do just that based on some warped brain pattern (looks dead to me) called multiculturalism. There is no culture that isn't as good as ours. Look how stupid Islam is - segregation, imperialism, devaluing of life, parasitic thesis, male domination, repression of freedom of expression, apostasy (still hard to believe that our media doesn't judge this as an abomination), and lest we forget, no images of their prophet Mo. Instead these abominations are described as traditional. If my ancestors ate monkeys for breakfast for 100 years, would we be considered traditionalists?

But then Islam, stupid is as it does, has their allys. You got your John Esposito and Karen Armstrungs, slugs singing the praises of Islam to the infidels and getting rich selling them poisoned cake. You got your leftist parties, who think they will tame that alligator Islam after they feed those evil capitalists to it. If you are at war, why do you have to pretend your enemy is your friend. I've never heard of a war like that before but I am sure it is a repeat of history, just with a twist. After all Islam, while incredibly stupid, is a 'religion.' Stupid thou it is. Our leaders need to stop feeding this mean old gator. It will never be a friend and always an enemy. Will we end up as stupid as Islam?

Friday, November 17, 2006

Sparing Saddam: Why Europe is Morally Unserious

Courtesy of The American Thinker's James Lewis (hat tip Wits0)

A general estimate is that Saddam Hussein killed 300,000 people, started two major wars (the first against Iran, costing a million lives, and the second against Kuwait, with perhaps 100,000 dead); according to the New York Times’ latest zig-zag, he came within a year of producing a nuclear bomb that could have been used to kill additional millions, and ensured the survival of his tyranny for the foreseeable future. For sheer sadistic mayhem, like routine rape and murder, there has been no worse regime than Saddam.

For the first time in human history, a mass-murdering tyrant on this scale has been caught, tried, and convicted in an open court of law. The people of Iraq and surrounding countries have been able to see him tried on television. Saddam has been sentenced to hang, according to Iraqi law, legitimized by the only elected government in the Arab Middle East.

By any decent human standard this is an extraordinary victory for civilization over barbarism.

But rather than applaud a heroic achievement of Iraqi justice right in the middle of a war, Europe now noisily parades its opposition to capital punishment for Saddam.

Forget the usual pros and cons of capital punishment. Just ask yourself: Is Europe a morally serious place?

We know that its politicians constantly preach to the rest of the world. No doubt dinner conversations around the European continent echo the politicians. Tens of millions of Europeans obviously believe they are more moral than thou. But is there any truth to that?

Remember, for the first time in human history a major mass-murdering tyrant has been caught and brought to justice.

Hitler was never caught. Stalin and Mao died in their beds, and Jean-Paul Sartre, Europe’s most famous philosopher of the 20th century, passionately supported them at the height of their reigns of terror. The entire French intellectual elite worships Sartre as well as Nazis like Paul de Man and Martin Heidegger. The whole gang of bloody-minded European professors either sided with the Nazis or the worst Leftist tyrants, just as today they are passionately attracted to Hamas and Hezbollah.

None of the tyrants who were glorified and rationalized by millions of Europeans were ever caught. Europe’s ideological collusion was active and necessary for all those crimes to take place. Europe’s scribbling classes created the propaganda and the diversions necessary for mass murder, not once, but over and over again over the last century.

But now Saddam Hussein has been caught, tried, and convicted, and will be hanged if his conviction is approved on appeal.

And Europe wants to spare Saddam’s life.

Ten years ago Europeans looked on passively while genocide took place in the Balkans; finally they talked the United States into acting. The Europeans and their hero diplomat Kofi Annan, looked on and did nothing while genocide took place in Rwanda. Today a credible court case in France alleges that the French colluded and stirred up the genocidal parties for its own benefit. Today, Europe supports the Sudan being a member of the UN Human Rights Commission, and fails to do anything about yet another African genocide carried on by the Sudanese regime over a period of decades.

Yet Europe wants to spare Saddam’s life.

The dirty little secret is that every mass-murdering ideology in the last two centuries had its origins and supporters in Europe. Pol Pot was Cambodian by birth but learned his revolutionary ideology in Paris. He was trained by the French Communist Party and the Russian KGB, went home, and massacred two or three million of his countrymen. Even Saddam’s Baathist Party was modeled on the European fascist parties of the 1930s.

Yet Europe wants to spare Saddam’s life.

The most infamous massacres of the 20th century, the Nazi genocide of some six million Jews, was inspired by a European nativist ideology.

Yet Europe wants to spare Saddam’s life.

Belgium conducted mass murders in the Congo. France fought a vicious imperial war in Algeria. Russia, under the guise of the vaunted Soviet Union, the hope of mankind, created forced starvation in the Ukraine. And today, North Korea is still, responsible for systematically starving hundreds of thousands of its own people. Kim’s regime is a stereotypical Stalinist regime —a European ideology passionately supported by millions and millions of people on that dark and cruel continent. (I do not refer to Africa.)

Today, Europeans politicians are again in the world news, very proudly calling to spare Saddam’s life. It shows their sweet and moral nature.

Now we have new tyrants and terrorist at the gates. Three thousand innocent Americans were murdered five years ago, but Europe is urging us to forget all about it; and above all, not to take 9/11 as a warning of what is to come if we don’t fight now. It’s because they are so peaceful.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promised to “wipe Israel off the map.” The Europeans have nominally taken the lead in negotiating with Ahmadinejad, to keep him from getting nukes. They have failed, because they are wishful weaklings, who rationalize any danger. The mullahs just laugh at them.

When sane nations take actions to stop Ahmadinejad, they will be viciously criticized by Europeans for doing so. We know that.

Europe is morally superior because it wants to spare Saddam.

If the whole world adopted Europe’s “higher morality” we would all be dead. Because their moralizing isn’t moral, it is merely flabby and self-indulgent.

We have protected Europe for a century with our blood and treasure. Under our protection they have constructed a Disneyland for adults, one that is utterly unable to defend itself. Instead, they have imported tens of millions of ideologues who want nothing more than to take over Europe.

Yet Europe is obnoxiously ready to preach morality to the decent nations of the world who are not as deluded as they are. True to their endless imperialistic arrogance, they are now exporting yet another world-conquering ideology, a fuzzier version of communism, aiming to actively hog-tie the United States through a hundred international treaties.

But this time they assure us that European-style world government will be paradise on earth. Trust us.

I’m curious – how is it that these people even dare to raise their heads when Iraq tries to punish Saddam?

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Ridicule for Malaysia

I'd say the ridicule is richly deserved after an American retired couple was harassed and manhandled by the Sharia Cops:

Lim: We’re been ridiculed over raid on US couple

The Tourism Ministry (has) received many letters expressing ridicule over the recent raid by religious authorities on an American couple in Langkawi, said Deputy Minister Datuk Donald Lim. He said some of the letters scorned him, asking if he takes along his marriage certificate when travelling overseas with his wife.

Richly deserved scorn, I would say again. And yes, Mr. Minister, do you take your marriage certificate with you when travelling with your spouse, not just overseas, but in your own country? After all, you never know when such documentation might be, er, useful.

“We are concerned, and hope that they (the religious council) can standardise the procedure (in conducting raids),” he said, noting that the councils in different states had different practices.

On Oct 12, Randal Barnhart, 62, and his wife Carole, 61, were in their rented condominium in Kuah when enforcement officers knocked on their door at 2am, accusing them of committing close proximity and demanding to see their marriage certificate.


"Standardise the procedure?" Lame, lame, lame! How pathetic can those Malaysian ministers get? I'd say damn pathetic.

Lim said the issue was raised at a recent meeting of the sub-committee on foreign tourism attended by about 60 representatives from agencies and private organisations. He noted that the Federal Islamic Development Department (Jakim)did not send any representative to the meeting.

"We hope the Prime Minister’s Department could come up with a guideline (on how khalwat raids should be conducted)," he told The Star at the International Chinese Tourist Association Conference 2006.
Hey Minister, how about voicing the radical idea of doing away with such raids altogether? Nah, that will never happen.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Each journey... starts with a first step.

Is one of them waking up... finally? Lets hope...that there will be more!

It is time to admit it
by Dr.Tawfik Hamid


I was born a Muslim and lived all my life as a follower of Islam.

After the barbaric terrorist attacks done by the hands of my fellow Muslims everywhere on this globe, and after the too many violent acts by Islamists in many parts of the world, I feel responsible as a Muslim and as a human being, to speak out and tell the truth to protect the world and Muslims as well from a coming catastrophe and war of civilizations.

I have to admit that our current Islamic teaching creates violence and hatred toward Non-Muslims. We Muslims are the ones who need to change.

Until now we have accepted polygamy, the beating of women by men, and killing those who convert from Islam to other religions.

We have never had a clear and strong stand against the concept of slavery or wars, to spread our religion and to subjugate others to Islam and force them to pay a humiliating tax called Jizia.
We ask others to respect our religion while all the time we curse non-Muslims loudly (in Arabic) in our Friday prayers in the Mosques.

What message do we convey to our children when we call the Jews "Descendants of the pigs and monkeys". Is this a message of love and peace, or a message of hate?

I have been into churches and synagogues where they were praying for Muslims. While all the time we curse them, and teach our generations to call them infidels, and to hate them.

We immediately jump in a 'knee jerk reflex' to defend Prophet Mohammed when someone accuses him of being a pedophile while, at the same time, we are proud with the story in our Islamic books, that he married a young girl seven years old (Aisha) when he was above 50 years old.

I am sad to say that many, if not most of us, rejoiced in happiness after September 11th and after many other terror attacks.

Muslims denounce these attacks to look good in front of the media, but we condone the Islamic terrorists and sympathise with their cause. Till now our 'reputable' top religious authorities have never issued a Fatwa or religious statement to proclaim Bin Laden as an apostate, while an author, like Rushdie, was declared an apostate who should be killed according to Islamic Shariia law just for writing a book criticizing Islam.

Muslims demonstrated to get more religious rights as we did in France to stop the ban on the Hejab (Head Scarf), while we did not demonstrate with such passion and in such numbers against the terrorist murders.

It is our absolute silence against the terrorists that gives the energy to these terrorists to continue doing their evil acts.

We Muslims need to stop blaming our problems on others or on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.

As a matter of honesty, Israel is the only light of democracy, civilization, and human rights in the whole Middle East.

We kicked out the Jews with no compensation or mercy from most of the Arab countries to make them "Jews-Free countries" while Israel accepted more than a million Arabs to live there, have its nationality, and enjoy their right s as human beings. In Israel, women can not be beaten legally by men, and any person can change his/her belief system with no fear of being killed by the Islamic law of 'Apostasy,' while in our Islamic world people do not enjoy any of these rights.

I agree that the 'Palestinians' suffer, but they suffer because of their corrupt leaders and not because of Israel.

It is not common to see Arabs who live in Israel leaving to live in the Arab world. On the other hand, we used to see thousands of Palestinians going to work with happiness in Israel, its 'enemy'. If Israel treats Arabs badly as some people claim, surely we would have seen the opposite happening.

We Muslims need to admit our problems and face them. Only then we can treat them and start a new era to live in harmony with human mankind.

Our religious leaders have to show a clear and very strong stand against polygamy, dophilia, slavery, killing those who convert from Islam to other religions, beating of women by men, and declaring wars on non-Muslims to spread Islam. Then, and only then, do we have the right to ask others to respect our religion.

The time has come to stop our hypocrisy and say it openly: 'We Muslims have to Change'.

Tawfik Hamid

In case you want to know more about Mr. Hamid, please go here, or here.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

The Texas Baby Factory for Illegals

Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, Texas is a fairly famous institution for a variety of reasons:

1. John F. Kennedy died there in 1963
2. Lee Harvey Oswald died there shortly thereafter
3. Jack Ruby, who killed Lee Harvey Oswald, died there a few years later by coincidence

On the flip side, Parkland is also home to the second busiest maternity ward in the country with almost 16,000 new babies arriving each year. (That's almost 44 per day — every day) A recent patient survey indicated that 70 percent of the women who gave birth at Parkland in the first three months of 2006 were illegal immigrants. That's 11,200 anchor babies born every year just in Dallas.

According to a recent article by the Dallas Morning News, the hospital spent $70.7 million delivering 15,938 babies in 2004 but managed to end up with almost $8 million dollars in surplus funding. Medicaid kicked in $34.5 million, Dallas County taxpayers kicked in $31.3 million and the feds tossed in another $9.5 million.

The average patient in Parkland's maternity wards is 25 years old, married and giving birth to her second child. She is also an illegal immigrant. By law, pregnant women cannot be denied medical care based on their immigration status or ability to pay.

OK, fine. That doesn't mean they should receive better care than everyday, middle-class American citizens. But at Parkland Hospital, they do. Parkland Memorial Hospital has nine prenatal clinics...nine!

The Dallas Morning News article followed a Hispanic woman who was a patient at one of the clinics and pregnant with her third child — her previous two were also born at Parkland. Her first two deliveries were free and the Mexican native was grateful because it would have cost $200 to have them in Mexico.

This time, the hospital wants her to pay $10 per visit and $100 for the delivery but she was unsure if she could come up with the money. Not that it matters, the hospital won't turn her away. (I wonder why they even bother asking at this point.)

How long has this been going on? What are the long-term effects? Well, another subject of the article was born at Parkland in 1986 shortly after her mother entered the U.S. illegally — now she is having her own child there as well. (That's right, she's technically a U.S. citizen.) These women receive free prenatal care including medication, nutrition, birthing classes and child care classes. They also get freebies such as car seats, bottles, diapers and formula. Most of these things are available to American citizens as well but only for low-income applicants and even then, the red tape involved is almost insurmountable.

Because these women are illegal immigrants they do not have to provide any sort of legitimate identification — no proof of income. An American citizen would have to provide a social security number which would reveal their annual income — an illegal immigrant need only claim to be poor and the hospital must take them at their word.

Even US military personnel — the same people risking their lives in combat zones every day around the world —and their families don't get any of these perks! Free car seats? Free diapers? Nope! The medical care these military families receive is perfectly adequate, but it's bare bones, meat and potato medical care — not top of line. On the other hand, the illegals' medical care is free — simply because they are illegal immigrants!

Actually, the illegals' medical care isn't free. The US taxpayers are stuck footing the bill...and that's not likely to change anytime soon. The Republicans, during all the years they ran the US Government, refused to do anything meaningful about the tidal wave of illegals swamping the country. Is a Democratic-run Congress going to be any different? I think you can figure that one out!

So my question is this: Does the US public medical care system treat illegal immigrants better than American citizens? Yes it does!

In a related story, Parkland Hospital offers indigent care to any US citizen who resides in Dallas County and earns less than $40,000 per year. However, these Americans must go through a lengthy bureaucratic application process to receive this benefit. The applicants must document that they did not refuse health coverage at their current job. Yeah, the 'free' care is not so free or easy for Americans after all.

There are about 140 (American) patients who received roughly $4 million dollars for un-reimbursed medical care. As it turns out, they did not qualify for free treatment at Parkland because they resided outside of Dallas County. So the hospital is going to sue them! Illegals get it all free! But U.S. citizens who live outside of Dallas County get sued! How stupid is this?

As if that isn't annoying enough, the illegal immigrant patients are actually complaining about hospital staff not speaking Spanish. In a recent AP story (apologies, link not available), the author speaks with a woman who is upset that she had to translate comments from the hospital staff into Spanish for her husband. The doctor was trying to explain the situation to the family and the mother was forced to translate for her husband who only spoke Spanish. This was apparently a great injustice to her.

In an attempt to create a Spanish-speaking staff, Parkland Hospital is now providing incentives in the form of extra pay for applicants who speak Spanish. Additionally, medical students at the University of Texas Southwestern for which Parkland Hospital is the training facility will now have a Spanish language requirement added to their already jammed-packed curriculum. No other school in the country boasts such a ridiculous multi-semester (multicultural) requirement.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

US Air Force Terrorizes Iraqi Child

This moving photograph shows Chief Master Sgt. John Gebhardt, superintendent of the 22nd Wing Medical Group at McConnell Air Force Base in Kansas, USA, holding an injured Iraqi girl. The picture was taken in October 2006, while Sgt. Gebhardt was deployed to Balad Air Base in Iraq.

According to the Air Force Print News, the infant girl Sgt. Gebhardt held in his arms "received extensive gunshot injuries to her head when insurgents attacked her family killing both of her parents and many of her siblings." Sgt. Gebhardt is now back home in Wichita, Kansas, with his wife and two children.

An Air Force Link article about the sudden fame he gained as the subject of this photograph reported that:

The chief had a knack for comforting [the injured Iraqi girl] and they often would catch a cat nap together in a chair. "I got as much enjoyment out of it as the baby did," he said. "I reflected on my own family and life and thought about how lucky I have been."

While deployed to Iraq, the chief tried to help out any way he could. He figured holding a baby that needed comforting that would free up one more set of arms that could be providing care to more critical patients.

"I pray for the best for the Iraqi children," he said. "I can't tell the difference between their kids and our kids. The Iraqi parents have the same care and compassion for their children as any American."

Killing Little Children for the Cause

Another sharp piece 'o writing from Strateegerie Page (StrategyPage). Note: minor corrections has been rendered to the content below for purposes of accuracy. Important stuff is in bold for your convenience.

A good example, of how self-destructive Islamic radicalism Islam is, can be seen in the continuing campaign to stop polio vaccinations. Several years ago, Islamic conservatives Muslims in Nigeria began urging parents to refuse polio vaccinations for their children. Eventually, this thwarted the worldwide effort to wipe out polio, because dozens of new cases appeared in Nigeria. All this comes from paranoid rumors that the medicine was a Western attempt to sterilize Moslem children. The Nigerian government put pressure on conservative Islamic leaders to stop preaching against the vaccination program, with mixed results. Islamic radicals clerics are preaching against other types of vaccinations as well, causing something of an "Islamic Plague" among the growing number of unvaccinated children.

This sort of illogical, self-destructive, paranoia is popular among Islamic radicals people and terrorists. It's a form of the popular hysteria that usually just manifests itself in rather harmless hero worship of entertainers or athletes. But since Islam was founded on the use of violence to spread the faith, and enforce discipline among followers, there's no end to this custom of conjuring up imaginary threats, and then getting violent over the issue. But in this case, most of the victims are young children, who are paralyzed for life, or killed, because their parents, caught up in paranoid fervor, refuse the vaccinations. In some cases, the Islamic radicals use force to keep the vaccination teams from an area, thus preventing many parents, who want the vaccinations, from getting them.

To some extent, these irrational and destructive policies should provide some counterterrorist opportunities. But not always, because of the delusional nature of this Islamic paranoia, even the negative outcomes of, say, stopping vaccinations, can be blamed on evil infidels (non-Moslems.) It takes a lot of effort to overcome this mentality, but until that is done, Islamic terrorism will keep coming back, as it has done for centuries.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

President Bush Meets With His New Party Leaders

President Bush greets his new leadership for the Democratic Party in the Senate. All were in a jovial mood and agreed it was a great victory for immigration reform and amnesty and citizenship.

Durbin can hardly keep the grin off his face. Reid looks like a Mr. Burns to me. Now that Bush has new party that agrees with him, he can now pass his 'destroy america' amnesty - open borders legislation. Bush disgusts me.

Veterans' Day 2006

Lest we forget. Thank G-d for our veterans on this Veterans Day.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

U.N. Celebrates Republican Loss?

From the this-shouldn't-be-surprising-anyone department (hat tip wits0)


From the desk of Kofi Annan's spokesman:

From: Stephane Dujarric Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:59 AM

Subject: Spokesman's Morning Headlines -- Wednesday

SPOKESMAN'S MORNING HEADLINES FOR WEDNESDAY, 8 NOVEMBER 2006 ...

US-ELECTIONS: Democrats seized control of the House of Representatives and defeated at least four Republican senators yesterday, riding a wave of voter discontent with President Bush and the war in Iraq. But the fate of the Senate remained in doubt this morning, as races for Republican-held seats in Montana and Virginia remained too close to call as Election Day turned into the day after. (NYT online) Virginia is facing a likely recount. (BBC)

Democratic gains in Congress were seen around the world Wednesday as a rejection of the U.S. war in Iraq that led some observers to expect a reassessment of the American course there. The shift in power also was seen as a signal in some capitals that the United States would put a greater emphasis on trade policy and human rights. (AP) ...

Apart from controlling the purse strings, it is unlikely, given the nature of the U.S. presidential system, that a Democratic majority in Congress would influence the direction of the current administration's foreign policy in the last two years of its tenure. (Washington Times)

Everything is different now for President Bush. The era of one-party Republican rule in Washington ended with a crash in yesterday's midterm elections, putting a proudly unyielding president on notice that the voters want change, especially on the war in Iraq. (NYT analysis)

Whatever this election accomplished, it did nothing to end the rancor and distrust that define current American politics. Yet, as the campaign went on (and on) there was one issue on which people from both parties appeared to be finding common ground: Donald Rumsfeld has to go. (NYT ed)

Is it just me, or does the mood over at Turtle Bay seem downright jubilant right now? Perhaps the U.N. thinks they'll be getting more support ($$$) now?

Nice to know that those US taxpayer dollars are put to such good use at the United Nations.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Big News Day in the States

Voters Hand Congress to the Dems
AND
Rummy Resigns

In a big rebuke to the GOP, the Dems now control the House, and quite likely, the Senate as well. This midterm election has been very tight and hotly contested nationwide, so recounts, court challenges and other legalities look sure to be in the cards. Those are theatrics, however, and not likely to make much difference in the end.

The election was the Republican's to lose, and they deserve the shame of their defeat. They seemed to me to be more interested in perks and holding onto their 12-year monopoly on legislative power, more than the reforms that they were voted in for. It wasn't so much the "war" in Iraq than scandal at home that did in the 'Publicans. If Foley had been quietly ushered out years ago, if Hastert had resigned, if Abramoff had been handled differently, the results might have been very different.

With Rummy heading back to the private sector, and the Defeat-o-crats holding the purse strings and chairs of various influential committees, the enemies of America have to be smiling today. Dems running the Congress and hamstringing an ever-more-beleaguered Prez at every opportunity is a recipe for an American government that's going to be a lot less lethal to the Global Jihad.

Monday, November 06, 2006

U Penn President Gutmann Keeps Digging That Hole


President Gutmann reminds me a lot of the disgraced Reverend Haggard ('I didn't have sex 36 times.'). They are habitual liars AND they can't shut up. She has now posted another apology with 'more context.' She keeps acting like she was so clueless to the outfit when the photo was taken. Never seen it among the crowd? Did you know Saadi in any way before the party. Did you speak to him, even casually prior to the photo? Come clean President Gutmann. Do dig a little faster.

Twenty Things You Should Know About Islam

Fellow counter-jihadist "Religion of Pieces" has authored, and posted via Infidel Bloggers Alliance, an outstanding, concise reference work on "I-slam" (as fellow wag wits0 might say). This work, entitled "20 Things You Should Know About Islam", is something I urge everybody to read. If you have time for only one article on the counter-jihad this week, or want to share only one article with blissfully ignorant kufirs or loony leftist friends, this is that one article.

Indeed, I was so impressed with RoP's work that I've decided to permanently place "20 Things You Should Know About Islam" in our PI sidebar under "Enlightening Articles on the Cult of Islam". What's really impressive with RoP's piece is the amount of meticulous research and support he/she has found to back up these 20 facts. Many, many links to articles from numerous different sources can be found in this piece. Now, I cannot personally vouch for every single link found therein, but the weight of the evidence is simply overwhelming, and damning.

I will reproduce the "20 things" here for you time-constrained infidels, minus the many links. To view the supporting evidence, by all means, follow the new link in our sidebar.

"20 Things You Should Know About Islam"
by 'Religion of Pieces'

ISLAM...

1. Is a mind-control and information-control cult founded by a murderer, torturer, brigand, rapist and pedophile called Mohammed. The mind-control and information-control aspects require that all criticism be silenced.

2. Is Mohammed's personality cult. Has no foundations other than Mo's murderous rantings (Koran and Hadith). The Koran consists of two conflicting parts - Meccan and Medinan (peaceful and violent respectively). The Medinan stuff supersedes ('abrogates') the Meccan stuff. Muslims act Medinan, but quote Meccan verses to the gullible infidels.

3. Claims to worship the same God as Christians and Jews, but in fact worships Allah - a demonic channeling through Mohammed's psychopathic ego. The Death Cult mixes garbled versions of Christian and Jewish scriptures with pagan practices such as moon and meteorite-worship, and cut-throat blood sacrifice of animals and non-believers.

4. Has no rational, philosophical nor theological basis, and the whole belief-system is contradicted by science, philosophy, common sense, human decency, and internal inconsistency.

5. Cannot withstand rational criticism. Islam can only spread and maintain itself by ignorance, illiteracy, war, terrorism, and intimidation. Islam has bloody borders and cannot co-exist peacefully with other belief systems. Winston Churchill said that Islam in a man is as dangerous as hydrophobia (rabies) in a dog.

6. Has a superstitious dread of images of pigs, crosses, Buddhas, Saint George (and his flag), teddy bears, and of course Motoons.

7. Regards Islamic women as semihuman. Wife-beating, incest and child abuse (including mufa’khathat or 'thighing' - the ritual abuse of infants) are encouraged.

8. Regards all unbelievers (Kaffirs, Kuffar, Kufrs, Kafirs) as ritually unclean subhumans to be killed, subjugated, enslaved, exploited, or parasitised. Kafirs are described by the Arabic word 'najis' - literally 'filth'. That's why Muslim hatred of Kafirs is intrinsic to their 'religion'. A Kafir doesn't need to DO anything to offend a Muslim; his very existence is enough of an affront.

9. Possesses an ethical system that applies only to Muslims. Allah encourages rape, pillage, extortion and enslavement of non-Muslims. Morality does not extend beyond the global gang (ummah). Muslim ethics are the ethics of the Mafia.

10. Has followers who are motivated by hatred, greed and lust. There is no love, mercy or compassion. Allah is vindictive, unpredictable, capricious and devious - "Allah leads astray whom he pleases".

11. Is the only religion NOT founded on The Golden Rule. Morality is based on Mohammed's example. If Mohammed did it, then it's OK for all Muslims. Hence the encouragement of rape, pillage, subjugation and murder of non-believers and the institutionalised pedophilia prevalent throughout Muslim society- justified by Mohammed's activities with Ayesha, his child sex-slave.

12. Defines all human relations by Dominance/Subjugation. Muslims have schizoid inferiority/superiority complexes. (A well-balanced Muslim is one with a chip on each shoulder). They respect strength but despise compromise as weakness. Appeasement invites more aggression. The only political system which has been strong enough to subjugate Islam is Stalinism.

13. Establishes and legitimizes polygamy, which ensures alpha-males get extra women, leading to a shortage of women for the betas. Beta-males must either jerk off (a sin leading to hell), or form dog-packs and rape or capture kafir women as booty in a razzia, or else self-destruct in the presence of infidels so that then they can screw 72 mythical virgins in Allah's bordello in the sky. Beta-males are often encouraged by their relatives to become suicide bombers because of the belief that such murderous 'martyrs' will be able to intercede with Allah to take 70 of their relatives to paradise with them.

14. Encourages lying and the deception of infidels (taqiyya). This may take many forms, including outright lies, feigned moderation, and condemnation of terrorist attacks to the Kaffir while rejoicing the same with fellow Muslims. Muslims often tend to regard themselves as victims of some group of Kafirs so they can harbor grudges against them and against Kafirs in general.

Individual Muslims may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and must be considered potential killers who can flip in an instant (SJS -'Sudden Jihad Syndrome').

15. Forbids befriending Kaffirs except for purposes of deceit or where conversion may be possible.

16. Purports to have a 'holy book', the Koran, that is Allah's final word, and cannot be changed or challenged. To do so is punishable by death. Consequently, the Death Cult can never change or be reformed. The instructions to murder and rape infidels are just as valid now as the day they were written.

Since Islam cannot be modernised, the Muslims are attempting to Islamise modernity. This requires spreading Islam in the West and simultaneously preventing any criticism of the cult by intimidation and PC legislation to curtail freedom of expression.

17. Regards treaties and agreements with Kaffirs as meaningless, and are made to be broken (Hudna). The word of a Muslim to a Kafir counts for nothing in the eyes of Allah. Allah is The Father Of Lies.

18. Divides the world between Dar-al-Islam (the Islamic Realm) and Dar-al-Harb (the domain of war, the Kufr lands). Muslims living in Dar-al-Harb must work to disrupt their host nations until these can be brought into Dar-al-Islam.

19. Encourages Muslims to parasitise their host nations. In fact, Muslims have no obligation to their host nations. Welfare fraud, identity theft, forgery etc. are endemic in Western Muslim populations, and serious crime against Kaffirs is regarded as normal and justified. Extortion rackets against Kafirs are mandated by the Koran ('jizya' is the Arabic term for 'protection money' payable by Jews and Christians to Muslims).

20. Is a complete system, including a culture, which Muslims regard as superior to other cultures (despite all evidence to the contrary). Jihadist attacks on their host nations aren't just against its religion and economy, but are aimed at its very cultural identity.

Muslims are therefore required to destroy the symbols of 'Jahiliya' (sometimes spelled 'Jahiliyya') - non-Muslim culture. In the East this has included destruction of Hindu temples and Christian churches and replacement with mosques, and destruction of Buddhist artwork, temples, and universities and replacement with heaps of rubble. This process of cultural replacement is now beginning in the West.

UPDATE: Slightly changed the original text to be in one consistent format throughout. Other than this, the content is unchanged from the original source.

Sunday, November 05, 2006

What if Europe is dying?

Courtesy of The Washington DC Examiner Newspaper
Oct 27, 2006

WASHINGTON - Advocates of realpolitik in foreign affairs contend the best policy is the one based on a realistic assessment of the relative powers, interests and possibilities of any given situation. These same voices have been strangely quiet, however, about an emerging reality on the world stage that deserves the focused attention of thoughtful Americans — the Europe familiar to generations of Americans is passing from the world scene and is being replaced by one that shares little with this nation or its historic fundamental values and interests.

The signs of this passing are sometimes difficult to pick up but they are there and an increasing number of observers are beginning to think and comment about the phenomena. Paul Belin of the Brussels Journal notes, for example, that “Mohammed is the most popular name of new born males in Brussels, Rotterdam and other major European cities.” And no wonder, considering that:

“The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in. One does not have to be prophetic to predict … Europe is becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics. The number of Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in 20 years. By 2025, one-third of all European children will be born to Muslim families.” These figures remind us that, as demographers well know, demographics are destiny.

Belin was prompted by an interview in a Dutch newspaper in which German author Henryk Broder lamented that young Europeans who value things like individual freedom should emigrate to New Zealand or Australia now because in 20 years they will not recognize Europe. French police who nightly battle Muslim youths who increasingly describe their struggle as an intifada might say Broder’s timetable is optimistic, as an average of 112 cars are burned every night in France these days, according to the London Times.

The Islamization of Europe clearly is not occurring overnight, but it is happening and that fact has profound implications, for better or worse, for American policymakers today and in the future. As Mark Steyn puts it: “Basically the European nations are dying and the populations in them are turning into relatively hostile Muslim populations, not all of them terrorists, but all of them, almost all of those people not sympathetic to America and American interests.”

An Islamic majority in Europe would not necessarily be uniformly anti-American, but, to cite but one example, there is little doubt that it would be vastly more anti-Semitic, thus profoundly complicating American determination to ensure Israel’s survival. Among the nations of the Middle East, Israel most shares American values and must be protected, but the time is now for Americans to recognize the situation developing Europe and prepare to deal with it.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Senator Kerry, here's your sign

Courtesy of a Minnesota National Guard unit, currently deployed to the sandbox.

God bless the troops, and to hell with Jean Kerry.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Malaysian Islamofascist Cops--"We did nothing wrong"

As I had predicted in my previous post on this incident, American retirees Mr. and Mrs. Randal Barnhart, who made the mistake of recently vacationing here in the Melayu Islamic Republic, are not likely to be receiving their desired compensation, let alone an apology, any time soon. If ever.

To quickly refresh everyone's memories (no doubt somewhat dulled by mass consumption of cheap Halloween candy), the Barnharts were the recent victims of a Malaysian Sharia Police raid on their rented condo at 2am. Their supposed crime? These 60-something criminal masterminds committed the dreadful Islamic sin of "Khalwat", AKA "close proximty". Actually, Carole and Randal should be hailed for that accomplishment, as most American marriages don't last 42 years, as the Barnharts have managed to do.

As expected, the Islamic cops aren't backing down...not one inch.

Religious department defends khalwat raid on Americans

ALOR STAR: Religious enforcement officers followed procedures when conducting a khalwat (close proximity) raid at a condominium in Langkawi rented by an American couple. (Followed procedure? Gosh, I guess that makes everything ok then!)

A Kedah Religious Department spokesman said the raid conducted at 2am on Oct 12 was made following public complaints of immoral activities at the condominium. (what the hell are "immoral activites" anyway? Kissing your wife? Or handholding with your spouse?)

“The officers only knocked on the door and they did not enter the condominium. (golly, these Sharia Police chaps sound so reasonable. You think they were over just to say hello and chant "Malaysia--truly Asia"!)

“They asked for the couple’s passports and marriage certificate to ascertain their religion,” he said when contacted here yesterday. (because, you know, Muslims have nothing better to do at 2am)

Retired policeman Randal Barnhart, 62, and wife Carole, 61, had complained the officers demanded to see their marriage certificate although Barnhart had told them they were Christians and should not be subjected to Islamic law. (all the bloody good complaining will likely do for you) Following the unpleasant episode, the couple said they were reconsidering plans to make Malaysia their second home. (Mr. and Mrs. Barnhart, I highly recommend you take your Retiree Kafir Dollars someplace where they will be more appreciated. And, while you're at it, try retiring someplace Americans are more appreciated too. Australia perhaps?)

Tourism Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor was reported to have ordered Tourism Malaysia to look into the incident.

The minister did not like such incidents, as it spoiled the country’s image, a spokesman said.

You see, the Malaysians are embarassed, not at the ongoing outrageous miscarriage of justice that is Sharia, or the totally unwarranted harassment of innocent tourists who did nothing wrong. No, Mr High-and-Mighty Tourist Minister is only concerned because this rather public incident makes his country look bad. "Losing face" in Asian cultures is very, very important, don't cha see.

Infidel retirees and tourists, you can help Malaysia along in their quest for Islamic purity. Never, ever come here.