Thursday, February 15, 2007

Banning Muslim Immigration Enters the Mainstream Press....In Australia

Limit Muslim migration, Australia warned

Barney Zwartz
February 16, 2007

LIFE can become untenable when the Muslim population of a non-Muslim country reaches about 10 per cent, as shown by France, a Jewish expert on Islam says.
The Australian Jewish News yesterday quoted Raphael Israeli as saying Australia should cap Muslim immigration or risk being swamped by Indonesians.

Professor Israeli told the Herald that was a misunderstanding. But he said: "When the Muslim population gets to a critical mass you have problems. That is a general rule, so if it applies everywhere it applies in Australia."

Professor Israeli, an expert on Islamic history from Hebrew University in Jerusalem, has been brought to Australia by the Shalom Institute of the University of NSW. The Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council is co-hosting many of his activities.

He said Muslim immigrants had a reputation for manipulating the values of Western countries, taking advantage of their hospitality and tolerance.
"Greeks or Italians or Jews don't use violence. There is no Italian or Jewish Hilaly [a reference to the controversial cleric Sheik Taj el-Din al Hilaly of Lakemba mosque]. Why?"

Professor Israeli said that when the Muslim population increased, so did the risk of violence.

"Where there are large Muslim populations who are prepared to use violence you are in trouble. If there is only 1 or 2 per cent they don't dare to do it - they don't have the backing of big communities. They know they are drowned in the environment of non-Muslims and are better behaved."
In Australia, Muslims account for about 1.5 per cent of the population.
Professor Israeli said that in France, which has the highest proportion of Muslims in Europe at about 10 per cent, it was already too late. There were regions even the police were scared to enter, and militant Muslims were changing the country's political, economic and cultural fabric, and demanding anti-Semitic and anti-Israel policies.

"French people say they are strangers in their own country. This is a point of no return."

"If you are on a collision course, what can you do? You can't put them all in prison, and anyway they are not all violent. You can't send them all back. You are really in trouble. It's irreversible." [It's irreversible IF political correctness is irreversible.]

Professor Israeli said that in Australia a few imams had preached violence. "You should not let fundamentalist imams come here. Screen them 1000 times before they are admitted, and after they are admitted screen what they say in the mosque."

He said some Muslims wanted to impose sharia (Islamic law) in their adopted countries, and when propaganda did not work they turned to intimidation.
Professor Israeli said his task was to describe, not prescribe. He also said his warning did not include immigrants, including Muslims, who simply wanted to improve their lot. As long as they respected the law and democracy, their numbers — Buddhist, Muslim or Jew — were immaterial. It became material when a group accepted violence.

"The trains in London and Madrid were not blown up by Christians or Buddhists but by Muslims, so it is them we have to beware," he said.
Keysar Trad, of the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia, said "Not only religious clerics need to be screened before entering Ausralia but also academics … this type of academic does nothing but create hatred, suspicion and division … We should review not only what the man has said but also those who have sponsored him, to see if they endorse those comments."


Nilk said...

Bolta aka Andrew Bolt is probably our most prominent right wing columnist/journalist here in Oz, and he has been consistently keeping islam under the spotlight.

His blog has a remarkable range of trolls, but there also some good comments there.

Thought you might enjoy a look (although 'enjoy' may not be the most appropriate word).

I've been an avid reader of his for years, and only discovered the blogosphere through one of his columns nearly 2 years ago.

The rest, as they say, is history.

To keep this on topic, there are more and more people openly saying that muslim immigration needs to be restricted. It's still not the deafening roar that we want to hear, but it is becoming louder.

Especially whenever Keysar Trad (see for a good read on this piece of work).

John Sobieski said...

At least Australia is talking about is, all you have here in America is deadly silence.

Southern(USA)whiteboy said...

Deadly silence. Not.

There is more going on than we might know. A quick comment to your reps, chief of police, etc., helps to boil it up. What are you doing about this, Chief? It just takes a phone call and lots of willpower. We *are*- also- the people.

Ann said...

"LIFE can become untenable when the Muslim population of a non-Muslim country reaches about 10 per cent, as shown by France, a Jewish expert on Islam says."

I do so hope that we all take this figure (10%) very, very seriously. In demographic studies, it has been shown that it takes the support of only 10% of a population to launch a viable movement, and in many western countries, that percentage has been equalled or even exceeded ("they" say that the figure in France is 15%, but there are those who cite 20% as a more accurate figure).

The American Revolution itself had the support of only 30% of the population, and look what we did even though we were in the minority!

We MUST NOT allow the Muslim population become any larger; restricting "incoming" is an excellent start. Kicking out non-citizen Muslims is a good second step, and stripping naturalized citizens of their citizenship and deporting them if they so much as jay-walk is a good third step.

Of course, there are further, completely legitimate "steps" that can be taken if this is insufficient.

Just in case this is said by
blogger to come from "Ann," which it has been doing lately, let it be known that it is "Cubed," not "Ann!"