Some members of the GLBT (Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender) community, rather than succumbing to the usual Kos Kidz-style 'progressive' leftie Bush hatred, actually know who their real enemies are.
This was recently sent to me and comes from a gay blogger named Michael, who is responding to a typical piece of Muzzie hate mail. Michael proves here that he is definitely smarter than the average bear.
Michael, you are a hypocrite!why do you always preach hatred towards arabs and muslims??Your blog seems to always have some racial comment.I find it disgusting. I am an arab and a muslim, i have jewish friends and i have had jewish partners in the past, we dont have a problem against the jews, Israeli politics is another matter. Get your facts straight...maybe a copy of Chomsky will do you good.
Dear Son of Allah,
First, you should educate yourself a little bit. My blog has no racial comments, as Islam is not a race, it is a religion. Someone much more intelligent than I stated, "speaking of racism in relation to a religion and not a race is a disservice to language and intelligence."
In my blogs I am speaking of Islam and its followers, Muslims. Now how am I a hypocrite? I think you need a vocabulary lesson. Am I a hypocrite because I call things by their names, or because I show a video clip that shows the fact that Muslims collaborated with Nazis in murdering innocent people during the second World War?
You want to know why I despise followers of Islam? The list would be far too long, but I will give you my favorite points and I will not go very far back in time. Tell me brother, who's been terrorizing the world for the past 50 years? Who commits 99% of the world's terrorist activities? Who is committing all of the suicide bombings in the name of Allah? Who's behind every major terrorist plot, executed or not, from that of September 11th in the U.S. to the bombings in London several months ago? Who is responsible for the security checks at airports and government buildings all over the world? Who is responsible for us paying exorbitant costs to secure our ports, buildings, airports, and tunnels, etc.? Isn't it because of your people? Yet, you are still proud to tell me that you are a Muslim, that you live by this book, which is no better than Mein Kampf?
Yes I absolutely despise, hate, and fear Islam and my reasons are so obvious and clear, if one cannot understand my anger, he is a fool. In fact I hate the religion which in most Islamic countries imposes burkas on women, denies women an education, visits to doctors, in which polygamy is a norm, where gay people are publicly executed in front of entire towns, where for drinking alcohol you receive the death penalty. And yes, I said that I fear Islam, not just because of what they inflict on their own people, but because they try to impose their insanity on the entire Western world.
In the name of the Qur'an, Muslims have terrorized the entire world for centuries. Can you name a single part of the Western world where in the name of Allah, your brothers have not executed or planned a terrorist attack? Muslims feel that they have the authority to kill people just because they don't grow long beards, wear burkas, or because they drink alcohol or watch movies, love music, television, and simply love life. Your brothers want to kill infidels because we make love with whomever we want whenever we want.
Why the fuck would I respect your people, if they don't respect mine? What would be the point?
There is not a single Islamic country in the world that has a democratic regime, or even a shade of democracy. In the 21st century, Muslims still cut people's heads off for violating archaic religious principles, cut off women's fingers for wearing nail polish, cut people's hands off for stealing, et cetera.Now, you are telling me that you personally do not have a "problem" with Israel and have Jewish friends and I suppose you are homosexual as well. So how the hell are you a Muslim?
Bravo, Michael! Fine writing and directly on target.
Our kudos here at PI goes out to Michael, and to all the others that see the truth about Islam, be they gay, straight, or whatever.
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Some members of the GLBT (Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Transgender) community, rather than succumbing to the usual Kos Kidz-style 'progressive' leftie Bush hatred, actually know who their real enemies are.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
Anti-semitism in Korea, sadly, is alive and well. For proof of that, look no further than this best-selling Korean comic book (10 million copies sold and still selling strong).
But it gets worse than that. Today in my English class, I asked my Korean students to write about this Korean comic book, to tell me if they agreed or not with its preposterous claims. Here are some of their answers, reproduced here word-for-word (any grammatical mistakes below are the student's, and not mine).
All the claims made in this comic book are based on the American financial world being completely dominated by the Jews. In other words, America can never possibly be free from the Jews. I agree with the claims made in the comic book.
Like the books says, American finance is controlled by the Jews and naturally the American economy controls the world economy which eventually leads to the controlling the world of politics. This enabled the Jews to succeed in creating the Federal Reserve System that regulates the American currency supply.
And another student wrote this:
It is true that Jews control the most part of the United States. The reason why America helps Israel is that Jews are play an important role in U.S.
In addition, Jews have a large amount of money of the world, so it is true that we (Koreans) feel the Jews as a huge wall. It is just feeling of our citizen, and the author (of the comic book) wrote it truely.
And finally, this student penned these words of wisdom:
...there can't be doubt that Jews control America...For instance, America conquered Iraq although there is no clear reason to conquer Iraq. By the way, Jews have been opponent of Iraq because their land was lost by Iraq in history. So, it is clear that the Jews control America and they commanded America to conquer Iraq.
Yes, they really think do this way!
Keep in mind, these are 17-18 year-old, well-educated, English-speaking Koreans that come from well-to-do families. These are precisely the sort of people who should know better!
But, sadly, they don't. Their blind acceptance and belief in such nonsense is alarming. And who is going to stand up for the Jews in this country?
I really don`t know how to react to this. The guy who played the "main role" here, used to be an islamic leader, who got killed by a car bomb in 2003. I really laughed hard when I first saw this video, that shows how crazy they are. But later... I figured that in fact... it`s rather scary.
For more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayed_Mohammed_Baqir_al-Hakim
Saturday, February 24, 2007
and for 1380 years has terrorized the world. Yet many people who I am suppoed to believe are 'experts' or wise tell me lies out of ignorance or intent. I remember when I first realized the truth about Islam. It was a few months after 9/11 and a lot of research and reading. I was literally unable to eat for a day and after that did not have a decent appetite for a week. The torment of Islam would be with me for the rest of my life and many generations thereafter. To realize what fools we have been played by the Arabs, the Palestinians, the Muslims. Everything was a sham. Deception the rule. When I first read the Prophet of Doom site, I did not yet understand. I believed the Prophet of Doom site was 'too extreme', 'too unbelievable.' Recently I have gone back to read parts of the site again and now it is so real. So truthful with no political correctness. I give you the Prologue to Prophet of Doom. So many of our leaders do not really take religion seriously, not really. They consider the prophecies derived from the Bible as allegorical, stories. Likewise, they consider the Quran as allegorical where anything can be interpreted as kind as so many parts of the Bible are, especially the New Testament.
There is just no excuse. Political correctness and multiculturalism cannot be this blinding. This dumbing down of the senses looks ridiculous from my mind. Intelligent men seeking reality in denial; a folly I can only watch in disgust. Because political correctness and multiculturalism was never that glorious to me, I never closed on the purchase, but evidently a lot of our leaders have.
Suppose you stumbled upon the Constitution of an organization that was terrorizing the world. Would you ignore such a document, or would you read it? Suppose you discovered that this Constitution’s most prominent themes were pain and punishment, thievery and violence, intolerance and war. If the regime’s charter ordered its devotees to kill, plunder, and terrorize, would you sound an alarm?
What if this Constitution was supported by a manifesto that contained the only authorized biography of the regime’s founder, and the first devotees of this doctrine, its co-founders, said that their leader was a sexual predator, a pirate, and a terrorist? If you found such evidence, what would you do with it? What if this leader motivated his mercenaries to murder and mayhem by allowing them to keep what they had stolen in the name of the cause - their victim’s homes, businesses, money - even their women and children?
All right, no more hypotheticals. I'm going to share some passages from this Constitution - from the covenant of the world’s largest and most violent organization. I have changed the names to disguise the source without altering the message. "Your leader has sent you from your homes to fight for the cause. Your leader wished to confirm the truth by his words: wipe those who disagree with us out to the last. We shall terrorize everyone who is unlike us! So smite them on their necks and every joint, and incapacitate them, for they are opposed to our doctrine and our leader. Whosoever opposes our doctrine and our leader should know that we are severe in retribution. And know that one-fifth of what you acquire as booty in war is for our great leader (the rest is for you). The use of such spoils is lawful and good."
This popular and misunderstood Constitution says: "Fight them till all opposition ends and only our doctrine rules. If you meet anyone who disagrees with us in battle, inflict on them such a defeat as would be a lesson for those who come after them, that they may be warned. Slaughter those who disagree with us wherever you find them. Lie in wait for them. They are specimens of foolishness. Punish them so that our superior dogma and leader can put them to shame. If you apprehend treachery from a people with whom we have a treaty, retaliate by breaking it off. Those who do not think like us should know that they cannot bypass our doctrine. Surely they cannot get away. Fight them until they pay a heavy tax in submission to us; how perverse are they. Our leader and his doctrine will damn them. For anyone who offends our leader or opposes our doctrine will receive a painful punishment. We will burn them alive. So prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster, that you may strike terror in the enemies of our cause!"
This Constitution is genuine, and millions follow its message. Exposing it - understanding it - might actually save you from the wrath it inspires. The covenant goes on to say: "Our great leader urged all who agree with us to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination, you will vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, then you will vanquish a thousand of our enemy, for they are a people devoid of understanding. Our great leader drove your enemy back in fury. He motivated our side in battle. He made their citizens flee from their homes and he terrorized them so that you killed some and made many captive. Our great leader made you inherit their lands, homes, and wealth, and gave you a country you had not traversed before."
This sounds like a terrorist manifesto - a covenant for war and genocide. Does anything this immoral, this out-of-touch with human decency, actually exist? If it did, and if it were this blatant, you'd expect to see its followers amassing their weaponry. You'd expect them to rise up and terrorize the world. Not only would they feel it was their duty to kill, you'd expect their fallen assassins to be immortalized - hailed as martyrs and paraded down crowded streets, banners waving, tears flowing, guns blazing, with angry diatribes spewing from hate-filled faces. You'd expect them to wage war under the guise of doctrinal supremacy, wouldn't you? And if there were such people, our journalists and politicians would have ferreted them out, exposed them, and protected us. Right?
Wrong! With the exception of changing the names of the perpetrators and their victims, what you read is from the actual Constitution of an enormous, rapidly growing, extremely well funded, and horrendously violent worldwide cult. And as bad as that sounds, it gets worse in context. The manifesto proudly proclaims that unarmed civilians were annihilated by armed gangs. Men were decapitated on the orders of the dogma’s founder. Thousands of children were sold into slavery. Women were raped - the leader himself participating. Townships were plundered, businesses were looted, and productive assets were destroyed. The villains slept in their victims' beds, abusing their wives and daughters. And each bloody affair was meticulously recorded by the founder’s companions and later chronicled by the regime’s most-esteemed clerics.
It’s time to turn the page. Let’s look at what the founder’s companions had to say about their leader in his manifesto. Once again, I will change the names but nothing else. "Kill them, for he who kills them will get a great reward. Our great leader said, 'Our doctrine assigns for a person who participates in battles in our cause to be rewarded with booty if he survives, or he will be admitted into the Hall of Heroes if he is killed in the battle as a martyr. Had I not found it difficult for my followers to do without me I would have remained in army units fighting great battles and would have loved to have been martyred for the cause.'"
The regime’s founder is quoted in the doctrine’s anti-Semitic manifesto saying, "Issue orders to kill every Jew in the country." He was asked, "What is the best deed?" by one of his devotees. The dictator replied, "To believe in me and our doctrine." "What is the next best deed?" the devotee queried. "To fight on behalf of our cause," he answered. At the end of one such conflict, one of the regime’s lieutenants told his commander, "We have conquered another nation. The captives and the booty have all been collected. Now, my leader, may I take a slave girl from among the prisoners?" "Take any one you like," the warlord replied, raping one himself. Ever mindful of his duty, this regime’s leader proclaimed, "Embrace our doctrine first and then fight." Followed by, "I have been made victorious with terror!"
You have stumbled upon the Constitution of the world’s largest nation - and it’s not China or Russia. You've just heard the words of its founding father, and he’s not Lenin, Mao, or Hitler. And today, this doctrine’s adherents are doing what their founder and Constitution ordered: fighting, ravaging civilians, stealing the world’s possessions, and using them to terrorize.
Since it’s happening according to plan, shouldn't we muster the courage to expose it - to speak out against it? Or should we remain silent for fear of offending them? The answer is obvious. Or is it? What if the names I substituted were Allah, Muhammad, and Islam? What if it’s a "religion?"
This "Constitution" is the Qur'an. The "manifesto" is the Islamic Hadith. The citizens of this nation are Muslims. They're doing what they were ordered to do. They left their homes to fight infidels; they stole our planes, ravaged our economy, and slaughtered innocents in the name of Allah. They even confessed to the crime. Yet not a single national spokesperson or politician has had the courage to hold Islam accountable.
Friday, February 23, 2007
To make my point in my previous post, here are some statistics -
* Illegal aliens are killing more Americans than the Iraq war (2158 in 2006)
* Illegal Aliens commit more than 15 percent of all the murders reported by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the U.S. That is three times the representation of illegal aliens in the general population
* 267,000 illegal aliens currently incarcerated in the nation are responsible for nearly 1,300,000 crimes.
More Americans killed by illegal aliens than Iraq war, study says
By Jim Brown
February 22, 2007
Diana West, who writes for the Washington Times has been exceptionally sharp about the 'sharia plan.' Recently MCB, the supposedly 'moderate' (imaginary) Muslim voice in Britanistan issued their guidance - Diana nails it with appropriate description 'manifesto', and proceeds to slice and dice. Pay attention, students who want to better understand how 'stealth sharia' works.
Imposing Islamic law
By Diana WestFebruary 23, 2007
I saw something eerie this week. It wasn't an apparition exactly, but rather a head-spinning blur of headlines about global jihad that, rather incredibly, began to take on the unmistakable shape of a British old school tie. How? Maybe I should start by explaining it was the old school tie that came to mind first in the form of a new publication on British education: namely, a 72-page manifesto (sorry, "guidance") from the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) on how British state schools might better accommodate children from the Muslim community, which, according to the 2001 census, makes up 2.7 percent of the British population. Did I say "better" accommodate their Muslim pupils? I mean, much, much better accommodate them. In fact, if the British were to adopt half of the MCB's recommendations for making British schooling Muslim-friendly, they might as well re-issue the 19th-century boy's school classic as Abdullah Brown's School Days. At the crux of the Muslim council's document is a call for special treatment for Britain's Muslim students that is so special as to reorient the entire British system according to Islamic law.
.... read further.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Bush is planning to destroy the Republican Party by June 2007. How? Bush plans to armtwist a third of the Republicans in Congress to vote for the McCain/Kennedy/Pelosi/Reid/Bush AMNESTY bill now being cooked up by McCain and Kennedy. It will transform the US into a Hispanic majority nation within a generation. But it will destroy the Republican Party forever. As a lifelong Republican, I will abandon the Republican Party if this Amnesty Bill is passed. Don't write me for donations. Don't tell me it's no big deal. It is over. I must lookout for myself and work hard to isolate myself from America's coming destruction. The Republican Party will divide in two or will become a smaller RINO only party as I and others who feel betrayed leave the Party and in many cases, political activism. Why fight for any group when the most 'conservative' party hardly represents you but looks more and more like a copy of the Democrat socialist party. Corporate greed and liberalism will have consumed and destroyed the Republican party. Maybe it is as it should be. A corrupted party should be destroyed. Perhaps from its ashes in decades from now, a new conservative party can arise. Perhaps.
Hat tip to Euro-Kafir (thanks!)
What happens when a fly falls into a coffee cup?
The Englishman - throws the cup away and walks away.
The American - takes out the fly and drinks the coffee.
The Chinese - eats the fly and throws away the coffee.
The Japanese - drinks the coffee with the fly, since the fly is provided at no extra charge.
The Israeli - sells the coffee to the American, the fly to the Chinese, and buys himself a new cup of coffee.
The Palestinian - blames the Israeli for the violent act of putting the fly in his coffee, asks the UN for aid, takes a loan from the European Union to buy a new cup of coffee, uses the money to purchase explosives, straps the explosives on, and then goes to blow up the coffee house where the Englishman, the American, the Chinese, the Japanese are all trying to explain to the Israeli that he is too aggressive...
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
I got this from a friend and thought I might as well share it:
How & why do the Muslims hate us & everyone else so much?
Doesn't their God teach them to love? Can a good Muslim be a good American?
I sent that question to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:
Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia .
Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)
Scripturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran).
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).
Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Therefore after much study and deliberation....perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country.
They obviously cannot be both "good" Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish....it's still the truth. If you find yourself intellectually in agreement with the above statement, perhaps you will share this with your friends. The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. Pass it on, Fellow Americans. The war is bigger than we know or understand.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
In Slate today Christopher Hitchens has this ridiculous article urging the US to continue to fight the civil war for the Shiites in Iraq. In fact, he points out that those who urge the US to leave and let the Muslims kill each other couldn't be more wrong.. Mr Hitchens has ' .... met a few very hard-line right-wingers who say: So what? If one lot of Islamists wants to slaughter another, who cares? It's very important to repudiate this kind of "thinking." Religious warfare is the worst thing that can happen to any society, and it now has the potential to spread to societies that are not directly involved. For the most part, official U.S. policy in Iraq has been sound in this respect, always working for a compromise and recently losing American lives to rescue the moderate Shiite leadership from a murder plot hatched by a messianic Shiite militia.'
Let me set Mr. Hitchens straight. Islam is the enemy. It doesn't matter what shit sect they are. Second, it is insane to waste a single infidel on the Muslims. For Mr. Hitchens, American soldiers don't seem to have much value in his foolish 'idealism' that infidels can make a difference in the sick Muslim world.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Rep. King recalls the Barbary Pirates in his 'no' vote. I didn't know where 'leathernecks' came from. Did you?
CAIR put up this section of his speech. I don't agree with staying in Iraq, let the Muslims kill each other, it's what they do best, but King has at least looked at history for a pinch of the truth.
Mr. Speaker, I take us back to how do we identify this enemy that we are fighting? So I looked back through some of the history. In 1783, we made peace with Great Britain. The Revolutionary War, for combat purposes, was over. 1784, American merchant marines were being attacked in the Mediterranean by Barbary pirates.In 1786, two diplomats, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, went over there to meet with them, and their idea was, we will be able to talk them into peace.Well, they talked to them all right, and the representative of the Barbary pirates, Mr. Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, responded to them, and this is in the Congressional Record from Thomas Jefferson’s report.He asked him, why do you fight us, why do you attack us, why do you kill us?We have done nothing hostile towards you. His answer was, It is founded on the laws of our Prophet. It was written in the Koran. All nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found and to make slaves of all they could not take as prisoners, and that every Muslim who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.I take you back to today. We call our Marines leathernecks. The reason for that is they wore a heavy leather collar to diminish the odds that they would be beheaded by this enemy who has, to this day, at least fairly recently, is still beheading Marines. That is how this started.
Hint: It isn't us (Australia), or the US.
By Andrew Bolt,
Sunday, February 18, 2007 at 11:50am
It is a dangerous and self-deluding mistake to focus only on suicide attacks in Israel and Iraq. That makes us forget that the carnage is not so much about us but about a theme - a theme that is even more dangerous to other Muslims than it is to us in the West.
From Pakistan today:
A SUICIDE bomber in Pakistan killed 16 people, including a judge, in a courtroom in the city of Quetta overnight in the latest attack in a series of suicide blasts to have sent shudders through the country.
Intelligence officials have attributed other attacks to sectarian Sunni militants linked to al-Qaeda and groups operating from tribal areas, regarded as hotbeds of support for the Taliban.
From Iran yesterday:
Police and insurgents clashed after a bombing in southeastern Iran late Friday near the site where an explosion killed 11 members of the elite Revolutionary Guards this week, Iranian news agencies reported…A Sunni Muslim militant group called Jundallah, or God’s Brigade, which has been blamed for past attacks on Iranian troops, has claimed responsibility for the Wednesday bombing, AP noted.
From Turkey yesterday:
A Turkish court has sentenced seven suspected Al-Qaeda militants to life in prison for their roles in suicide bomb attacks that killed scores of people in Istanbul in 2003.
From Algeria yesterday:
A deadly and carefully planned series of bomb attacks in Algeria by an al-Qaida affiliate may signal a new escalation in violence that many Algerians hoped had abated, experts say…Towns across the Kabylie region awoke Tuesday to a series of seven bombings, some car explosions, that largely targeted police stations. Six people were killed and about 30 injured.
From Lebanon on Thursday:
At least three people were killed and 20 injured when bombs packed with metal pellets tore through two buses traveling on a highway Tuesday, February 13, near the Christian mountain town of Bikfaya northeast of Beirut, Lebanese officials said.
From the Phillipines today:
Police in the Zamboanga Peninsula in Mindanao are now on alert after receiving an intelligence report that terrorists are planning to bomb buses and attack the transport sector there…Meanwhile, South Korea has warned its citizens not to travel to Mindanao because of possible bombings by the Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) terrorist groups.
From Thailand on Friday:
Suspected insurgents shot a village head in a mosque during Friday prayers in Thai southernmost province of Pattani, while eight rangers and police officers were wounded in two bomb blasts in Yala.
UPDATE: The day this was written, at least 28 more explosions were reported in southern Thailand. Targets included hotels, the electrical power grid, schools, and karaoke bars.
From Indonesia on Saturday:
Security forces are on highest alert in Indonesia’s restive Central Sulawesi province following warnings that militants may be planning attacks, the region’s police chief said on Friday…Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim country, has in recent years been hit by a series of bomb blasts blamed on Islamic militants.
From Eritrea today:
Hundreds of Islamist fighters were flown, with Eritrean assistance, from Somalia to Syria and Libya for military training. Others were taken to Lebanon to fight with Hezbollah, the report to the UN security council has revealed.
There is a pattern here, and I mean more than the absence of any wickedness by Westerners.
The incident happened at Abraham Moss Leisure Centre in Crumpsall. Mr Williams, a delivery driver from Blackley, had seen the parent-and-toddler session being promoted on the council's website and a leaflet.
Sunday, February 18, 2007
Re your article at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=a8izlUJaUOVw&refer=home
Thank-you for your article. Although it tells a somewhat more accurate story of the practice of this religion than many, it still falls far short of what your readers must know.
May I point out something about Islam. When you say that '``But there are many varieties of Islam.'' There certainly are, ...' you leave the reader thinking that this religion allows for a variety of expressions.
I would like to tell you that it doesn't. Unless you recognize this together with your journalist friends, civilization & our freedom are in mortal danger.
Of course many 'Muslims' are peaceful, but these are no Muslims! You must understand that these so called peaceful Muslims are not practising what & how the Koran prescribes.
The most perfect expression of Islam is found in the life of Mohammed himself. The most perfect Muslims are those who emulate his life now. They do what is written in the Koran & what Mohammed did. They are responsible for the butchery and mayhem of innocent people just as demonstrated by Mohammed. You can read their essays on what it means to 'slaughter with patience', as demonstrated by the Prophet.
Look at what the Koran teaches. This is what these so-called radicals & fanatics are obeying. Don't be misled by the 'peaceful' and 'conciliatory' passages, because these have been 'abrogated' by the later passages of the Koran & Hadith that rant about the extermination of all Jews and Christians.
If you need any help finding these let me know, but I will recommend something now. The heart of Islam today is in Saudi Arabia. Here Sharia Law finds good expression. No Jew is allowed to set foot in the country. Why? Here is an example of what is taught children on Saudi TV:http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-islam-teaches-little-muslim.html
Watch this short video & weep for this child. Weep for a whole generation.
Please stop & think about what is happening in the world. Please give your readers the truth.
Here you can read about the end-times view of Islam. This is widely preached. There is no comfort in that they recognize Jesus or Moses. Please read this & refer your friends to this: http://answering-islam.org.uk/Authors/JR/Future/index.htm
Have a nice day.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
In my previous article about Hebrew University Professor Raphi Israeli, who is on a speaking tour in Australia and his warning about Muslim immigration. He was supposed to be on a 6 week lecture tour in Australia sponsored by Australian Jews. Canceled, and apologies and groveling to the Muslims engaged. So many messengers, but are there enough buses? At least he is still standing proud after getting hit by a dhimmibus.
Read more about it at Israpundit but I'll post Prof. Israeli's personal communique regarding his abandonment by the Jews of Australia:
‘I became a celebrity two days after I arrived, and that subsumed all the rest of my activities. And then the storm erupted which made the dhimmi-like Jewish leadership  cancel all activities, in a shameful submission to the Muslim thugs and under the false claims of a “multi-cultural society” in Australia, which they know is not true.
The story is two-sided: I gave an interview and said many harsh words about Islam in Europe which the reporter extrapolated as applying to Australia too. The other issue is the political correctness which does not allow those things to be said, though privately, everyone supports what I said. In any case, my teaching on Islam stands and it even increased recruitment, but the public lecturing tour was cancelled and the Jewish leadership shamefully disowned me instead ofstanding up for me. I blamed the violence of Muslim in the world (and by implication here), but they chose to accuse the messenger, apologized to the thugs and brought upon themselves the disgrace of unconditional submission.
They do not want to rock the boat, they are scared to stir the mood and the easiest way for them was to sacrifice the guest they invited, thus punishing, not me, but the Jewish audiences who need the education for which I was brought here.
I was also struck by the provinciality of the place, where a minor item of gossip of an individual who said something becomes a national issue. I am not the Minister of Immigration. Before me the PM and Minister of Finance Costello have said harsher things after Muslim riots, but someone elected to seize upon this opportunity now and sweep Australia into a storm in a tea-cup.’
Friday, February 16, 2007
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Limit Muslim migration, Australia warned
February 16, 2007
LIFE can become untenable when the Muslim population of a non-Muslim country reaches about 10 per cent, as shown by France, a Jewish expert on Islam says.
The Australian Jewish News yesterday quoted Raphael Israeli as saying Australia should cap Muslim immigration or risk being swamped by Indonesians.
Professor Israeli told the Herald that was a misunderstanding. But he said: "When the Muslim population gets to a critical mass you have problems. That is a general rule, so if it applies everywhere it applies in Australia."
Professor Israeli, an expert on Islamic history from Hebrew University in Jerusalem, has been brought to Australia by the Shalom Institute of the University of NSW. The Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council is co-hosting many of his activities.
He said Muslim immigrants had a reputation for manipulating the values of Western countries, taking advantage of their hospitality and tolerance.
"Greeks or Italians or Jews don't use violence. There is no Italian or Jewish Hilaly [a reference to the controversial cleric Sheik Taj el-Din al Hilaly of Lakemba mosque]. Why?"
Professor Israeli said that when the Muslim population increased, so did the risk of violence.
"Where there are large Muslim populations who are prepared to use violence you are in trouble. If there is only 1 or 2 per cent they don't dare to do it - they don't have the backing of big communities. They know they are drowned in the environment of non-Muslims and are better behaved."
In Australia, Muslims account for about 1.5 per cent of the population.
Professor Israeli said that in France, which has the highest proportion of Muslims in Europe at about 10 per cent, it was already too late. There were regions even the police were scared to enter, and militant Muslims were changing the country's political, economic and cultural fabric, and demanding anti-Semitic and anti-Israel policies.
"French people say they are strangers in their own country. This is a point of no return."
"If you are on a collision course, what can you do? You can't put them all in prison, and anyway they are not all violent. You can't send them all back. You are really in trouble. It's irreversible." [It's irreversible IF political correctness is irreversible.]
Professor Israeli said that in Australia a few imams had preached violence. "You should not let fundamentalist imams come here. Screen them 1000 times before they are admitted, and after they are admitted screen what they say in the mosque."
He said some Muslims wanted to impose sharia (Islamic law) in their adopted countries, and when propaganda did not work they turned to intimidation.
Professor Israeli said his task was to describe, not prescribe. He also said his warning did not include immigrants, including Muslims, who simply wanted to improve their lot. As long as they respected the law and democracy, their numbers — Buddhist, Muslim or Jew — were immaterial. It became material when a group accepted violence.
"The trains in London and Madrid were not blown up by Christians or Buddhists but by Muslims, so it is them we have to beware," he said.
Keysar Trad, of the Islamic Friendship Association of Australia, said "Not only religious clerics need to be screened before entering Ausralia but also academics … this type of academic does nothing but create hatred, suspicion and division … We should review not only what the man has said but also those who have sponsored him, to see if they endorse those comments."
Oh the humanity. It doesn't matter that they were trying to kill thousands of infidels and only succeeded in killing less than 200. No what is more important is that their religion was not respected after they were arrested. These policeman and guards should be executed for insulting Islam. So goes this Bloomberg article. Can you believe it?
Madrid Bomb Ringleader Saw Koran Insulted in Jail, Court Hears
By Ben Sills
Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- One of the ringleaders of the group accused of carrying out the Madrid train bombings was stripped and insulted by Spanish prison guards who threw his Koran on the floor, Spain's National Court heard.
Rabei Osman el Sayed Ahmed, 35, faces Spain's maximum jail- term of 40 years for 191 counts of murder and more than 1,800 counts of attempted murder relating to the March, 11, 2004 attack on Madrid commuter trains.
``Three guards put him in a cold cell until three in the morning; they stripped him totally and forced him to take a cold shower,'' an account of Osman's December 2004 testimony read out in court said. ``One of the guards grabbed his Koran and threw it on the floor.''
Osman was part of a group of four who began planning for the attack in 2003, prosecution documents said. That group was led by Sarhane Ben Abdelmajid Faked, known as the Tunisian, who later died in an explosion in Leganes. Osman, alongside the Tunisian, then began recruiting and indoctrinating others who carried out the plan among his associates at Madrid main mosque alongside the M-30 ring road.
``I was prepared to be a martyr but certain circumstances prevented me,'' Osman told an associate after the attack, state prosecutor, Olga Sanchez, said.
Osman worked as a missile technician during his military service in Egypt, according to the testimony given to the Spanish investigators following his June 2004 arrest in Milan. He slept rough and in abandoned buildings when he came to Spain, selling clothes on the street.
Osman, dressed in jeans, a sweater and a cream-colored wind- cheater, declined to answer questions from prosecution lawyers during this morning's hearing. He will respond to questions from his defense attorney when the trial reconvenes at 4 p.m. Spanish time today.
Osman was kept in a dark cell and his watch was taken from him after being extradited to Spain, according to his testimony. That meant that he couldn't observe the Muslim prayer times and he didn't know in which direction he should turn to pray.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Raspail's novel got what are politely described as mixed reviews. The New York Times gave it two dissections, the first comparing it to a "perfervid racist diatribe" and dismissing it as "bilge," the second giving a slightly more measured verdict ("preposterous," "banal," etc.). Other hostile notices were "a fascist fantasy . . . a disgusting book" (Newsday) and "a psychotic fantasy" and "a dull and stupid book" (Providence Journal). The friendlier reviews generally saw it not as a realistic novel, but as a nightmare of symbolism and a novel of ideas: e.g., "a terrifying nightmare and a sedulous polemic" (Louisville Courier-Journal). But even many of the friendly reviewers were troubled by the thought that Raspail's vision, however profound, was tainted by racism.
Psychologically, Western elites have more or less emancipated themselves from nationalist or cultural concepts such as American patriotism or Western identity. Today, corporate multiculturalism is the philosophy that unites liberal and conservative elites-and, no less important, separates them from the hard-hat patriotism of the people. Indeed, the elites increasingly find the expression of such traditional loyalties embarrassing, alien (paradoxically), irrational, economically misleading, and even symptomatic of bigotry, xenophobia, and nativism. As citizens of an increasingly borderless world, they have outgrown such concepts as nationhood and national sovereignty, and they worry about the threat to liberty posed by those who still embrace these concepts.
The arrival of ever more migrants thus serves several purposes: It reduces the weight and influence of the middle- American masses in politics and culture; it makes multiculturalism seem less a matter of choice than of inevitable adaptation; and it fosters a society that, because it is divided ethnically and culturally, requires a political elite to manage it. And here The Camp was extremely prophetic, because the real villain in Raspail's book is not the "Last Chance Armada" of the Calcutta poor, but rather what Raspail calls "The Beast"-what Tom Bethell and Joseph Sobran call "The Hive"-namely, the vast retinue of progressive opinion-mongers in politics, journalism, religion, and other institutions, who, without being organized in any way, invariably come up with the same slogans, analyses, condemnations, and programs to advance the suicide of the West. This Beast/Hive seeks, first, to explain away any apparently threatening aspect of the coming invasion; for instance, it suppresses the news that the refugees might themselves be motivated by racism or xenophobia. Second, it instinctively loosens any bonds of social solidarity that might strengthen France and enable it to resist; thus, all expressions of doubt about the advantages of the invasion are ascribed to racism, xenophobia, and so on. The French are essentially made ashamed of their Frenchness, as a prelude to imposing on them a new identity. If this sounds grim, it is not. What makes The Camp such a funny book is the sardonic portrayal of progressive priests, bien-pensant liberal journalists, fatuous "peace" campaigners, and pious frauds of every kind as they fall over themselves to welcome the invasion.
Migrant ship docks in Mauritania
The ship's engine failed in international waters (Photo: IOM)Hundreds of Asian and African migrants have disembarked from their ship in the Mauritanian port of Nouadhibou, after being stranded at sea for a week.
The stricken vessel was given clearance to dock after Spain, the migrants' intended destination, agreed to pay for their medical treatment and travel.
Doctors were despatched to the Marine 1 while it was still at sea, amid concern for the migrants' well-being.
Some 40 of the about 400 migrants are in poor health, the Red Cross says.
The ship broke down in international waters last week and was towed close to shore by a Spanish boat.
Since then, it had since been waiting for clearance to dock, with Mauritania insisting that medical facilities had to be ready first.
Under the terms of the agreement, the sick and vulnerable were to be treated in Mauritania, while Spain would arrange the repatriation of the rest of the migrants from Asia and Africa.....
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
From PI's inbox...hat tip Steve Harkonnen
On March 17th, there will be a meeting in Washington D.C. of several left-wing agitation groups. They plan to protest against the war and other aspects of American foreign and domestice policy.
In attendance will be the usual suspects along with several leftist, anti-American Islamic groups. The plan is for the demonstration to begin at the Viet Nam War Memorial and end at the Pentagon.
As a veteran, I can think of few more disgusting acts than for America haters to set foot on soil dedicated to the preservation of the memories of America’s warriors whom have given their lives to safeguard our country.
A group, “Gathering of Eagles” has called for all Americans interested in safeguarding the Viet Nam War Memorial to meet in Washington on the 17th of March. There will be a counter-demonstration.
Please visit them at: http://gatheringofeagles.org/ for more information.
I want to stress that many of the Islamist groups that may attend have reputations for violence. Be wary of your surroundings, always have an exit strategy, pay attention to the police and comply with their requests. If you have children, you may want to seriously consider not bringing them.
Andrew WhiteheadDirector, Anti-Council on American-Islamic Relations (ACAIR)
Monday, February 12, 2007
Mr. Mumtaz, a busy by-tonque jihadi is just horrified, horrified, he thought there was an understanding with the infidels that they wouldn't dare, and he is ANGRY. Apparently they are lining up to kiss his ass as I write.
Muslims outraged by use of cartoon
MUSLIMS in Cambridge have demanded a public apology from a student who printed anti-Islamic material in a magazine.
"I'm actually shocked that intelligent people know how offensive this cartoon is and that they have decided to reprint it in such a horrible manner. It's disgusting."
The cartoon was printed alongside a picture of the president of the Union of Clare Students, with the captions switched. There was also comment suggesting one was a "violent paedophile" and the other was "a prophet of God, great leader and an example to us all".
Have a look at this site if you get the chance:
Warning: Turn your speakers down or off if you're at work.
Sunday, February 11, 2007
Director U.S. Citizenship: "[Amnesty] is going to change the complexity of America, change what America looks like. It's going to say a lot about us."
Are you ready for the Bush 'Destroy America' Immigration Bill? They aren't even trying to hide their plan from us any longer. Not only are they openly planning to destroy America through this insane amnesty program, they are going to sell it as a 'historic civil rights' event. Yes, giving 40 million illegal aliens and their families citizenship is a civil right. It would be wrong for us to deny the millions of illegal aliens their rights to citizenship!
Immigration chief: Reform would be historic
BY NIALA BOODHOO AND ALFONSO CHARDY
President Bush's temporary worker proposal has a better chance of passing in Congress this year, and if it does, it will be as significant a milestone in U.S. history as the civil rights movement, the head of the nation's immigration and citizenship agency said today.
'Immigration, as we all know, is the hot-button domestic issue of the day,'' Emilio Gonzalez, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, told the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce. ``And I'll go one step further and I'll tell you that immigration reform is probably as important as the civil rights movement was back in the '60s.''
Gonzalez's remarks before the opening session of a daylong chamber business/employer immigration seminar marked the first time that a senior-level federal immigration official has cast the effort to legalize millions of undocumented immigrants as a historic endeavor. Gonzalez's statements also amounted to the strongest indication yet that the Republican administration expects a majority Democratic Congress to pass a measure that would include some form of legalization for undocumented workers.
Gonzalez said he had met Thursday afternoon with President Bush, and ``I can tell you that he's as committed to comprehensive reform as he's always been.''
Efforts to rewrite immigration law failed last year when the House and Senate passed radically different bills that neither chamber ever reconciled.
The Senate bill called for the legalization of up to 10 million of the more than 12 million undocumented immigrants estimated to be living in the United States. The House bill called for rendering the undocumented as criminal felons, which would then bar them from immigration status and require their deportation.
Gonzalez, a Cuban American who arrived in the United States with his parents when he was 4 years old, would lead the effort to process work permits for the millions of undocumented immigrants who would be allowed to apply for status if Congress approves it.
USCIS approves or denies applications from immigrants for asylum, citizenship, green cards and work permits. Gonzalez recently announced a proposal for hefty application filing fee increases in a bid, he says, to improve and modernize service and quicken document delivery times.
Gonzalez said his agency needed to hike fees because, like a business, it needs to cover rising costs and move from paper to electronic files.
''USCIS is run just like any modern-day international corporation,'' he said. ``I operate as the CEO of an international enterprise with 16,000 federal and contract employees working in 260 offices around the world with a $2 billion budget.''
He said the agency was required to ''remain solvent every day'' because -- unlike other federal agencies -- it is not fully taxpayer-funded.
Gonzalez went on to stress that the proposed higher fees were not an attempt to deter legal immigration or the importation of foreign workers.
''In terms of sheer numbers,'' Gonzalez said, ``America is facing one of the largest migration waves in our history. Last fiscal year, USCIS processed more than seven million applications for benefits, and those numbers are expected to increase this year.''
Even more applications will be processed, he added, because ``the passage of comprehensive immigration reform is also on the horizon.''
In answers to questions after his speech, Gonzalez said he believed that prospects for passage of immigration reform in Congress were ''much better this year than last year'' because the administration is working with Democrats and Republicans in Congress on a compromise that he did not outline in detail.
''We are working with members of Congress on both sides of the aisle of both chambers to come to an agreement on language that everybody can support,'' he said. Also, he added: ``The president is very keen on comprehensive reform. He considers this to be one of the most important things he can do before he leaves office.''
After the morning session, Gonzalez explained why he compared immigration reform to the civil rights movement.
''The changes would be almost as dramatic,'' he told The Miami Herald. ``We are talking about how we treat 12 million people that are here, that are in the shadows. We are talking about how we treat legal immigrants. We're talking about how we bring in more people.
``It's so far-reaching and so comprehensive and it's a heavy lift. That's the comparison. It's not something that's just going to be easy. You know, you pass a bill and everybody goes on their way. This is a comprehensive reform that, if enacted, is going to change the complexity of America, change what America looks like. It's going to say a lot about us.''
Some infidels, even all this time after 9-11, still wonder "why they hate us." Watch this video and you will wonder no more.
From the heart of darkness, and America's premier sham ally, Saudi Barbarian state television.
Hat tip: Euro Kafir
Saturday, February 10, 2007
10 Feb, 2007
Izzadeen has been drawing media attention to himself for some time. A video from 2004 which showed him preaching in Regents' Park Mosque was recently broadcast on British TV. He said: "He who joins the British Army, the American Army, he is a mortal kaffir and his only hukum (punishment) is for his head to be removed. Indeed, whoever changes his deen (Muslim code of life); kill him."
Famed (alleged) 'moderate' Muslim, former Malaysian PM and (ahem) renowned elder statesman Doctor Mahathir (AKA Doc Moonbat) is now officially on the record supporting the bloodthirsty, murdering terrorist maniacs of Iraq. Not that it was ever in any serious doubt...but it's nice to see this nutjob make it official:
Mahathir backs Iraqi resistance
KUALA LUMPUR: Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad threw his support behind the Iraqi resistance and told them to ensure that the Americans “paid a high price for their adventure.”
Congratulating the Iraqi resistance, he said they might have to kill many Americans for their cause. ("...and no one's happier to see dead Americans more than me!" -Doc Moonbat)
“The body bags will help the Americans realise that no one should hegemonise and do whatever they like in the world,” he said in his closing address at the Expose War Crimes – Criminalise War (but Jihad is still ok) conference.
The conference was organised by the Perdana Global Peace (heh) Organisation of which the former prime minister is the chairman.
Dr Mahathir said that while there were instances where Iraqis might have killed each other, they could have been instigated by those planning to divide and rule, and subjugate the people.
'Might' have killed each other? Oh yes, it's always the fault of the infidels. Especially those treacherous and tricky JOOOOOOOZ. Doctor M, you are a f*cking idiot ... but that's an insult to village idiots everywhere.
Doctor M--someone should try you for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Inciting genocide, for starters.
Friday, February 09, 2007
By MATHEW WAGNER AND LAURA RHEINHEIMER, Jerusalem Post
Leading American news media have refused to sell Internet site ad space to the Jewish Agency for a campaign against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, according to Jewish Agency (JA) Spokesman Yarden Vatikay.
The JA and the World Zionist Organization (WZO) recently approached over 40 of the US's leading news media through Network Solutions, an Internet ad company, said Vatikay. But none agreed to sell banner space.
"They claimed the ad was a political statement and, therefore, disqualified," said Vatikay. "I find it unbelievable that a campaign against hatred and anti-Semitism could be considered political."
Shlomo Molla, the head of the WZO's Department for Zionist Institutions, who also heads the Jewish Agency's campaign against anti-Semitism, said that he was "deeply disappointed" with America's news media for refusing to sell the JA space on their Web sites.
"It seems as if history is repeating itself," said Molla, 39. "People stood by passively when Hitler rose to power also."
The only Internet sites that agreed to sell the banner space to the JA and WZO were JTA Global Jewish News, Haaretz's English edition, Google, Network and The Jerusalem Post.
CNN, one of the news media that Network Solutions said it approached, admitted that it refused to sell the banner space to the JA and the WZO.
"CNN International has for many years had in place strict and broad guidelines in relation to political and advocacy advertising on its international services, in respect to the diverse and often strict advertising laws in the many countries in which it operates," CNN said in an official response. "These mean that CNN does not accept advertisements that are deemed to fall into this category."
The Jerusalem Post contacted several additional media outlets that appear on a list supplied by the JA - including ABC News, the Boston Herald, Cox news, and Clear Channel for responses. All denied knowledge of the JA ad campaign.
Rob Klein, vice president of Integrated Sales at the Village Voice, who also said he knew nothing about the campaign, said his paper reserved the right to reject advertising at its discretion for a variety of reasons.
"It could be because of the way something is written or the political content," said Klein. "It goes on a case-by-case basis. Each one has to be reviewed."
Michael Cohen, publisher of the Village Voice, said he hadn't heard of any advertisement being rejected, including the JA's ad. He said it was "highly unlikely" that the ad had been rejected without his knowledge because "sales representatives work based on commission and it is in their interest to sell as much ad space as possible."
The ad, which was designed by Arad Communications, pictures Ahmadinejad with subtitles of his most virulently anti-Zionist statements flashing in red letters.
"As the imam said, 'Israel must be wiped off the map,' and "Anyone who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury" are some of the quotes.
A recording of Ahmadinejad addressing a cheering crowd is played over and over. The site also invites viewers to sign a petition censuring the Iranian president for his anti-Semitic comments. The banner with an AOL link to the site shows flies buzzing around a light bulb. "When you ignore the risks you get burned," states the banner.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Background and justification to Amendment 28
Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;
Whereas the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a “religious test” for participation in the body politic;
Whereas Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supersedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;
Whereas Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;
Whereas Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even “moderate” Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;
Whereas Islam includes as its basic tenet the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;
Whereas on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;
Whereas representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;
Whereas there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;
Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.
The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited.
Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.
The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited. The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.
The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and death as prescribed by Congress. Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death.
Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States.
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.
Many thanks to Scott for authoring this and submitting to our inbox.
UPDATE- Some of our 'fans' out there have noted a couple of language errors with this post, which have now been corrected. Thank you kindly for your support!
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
Laughyourheadoff.org announced the winners of their Muhammed cartoon contest. The three winning entries are below. Meanwhile in France, one of the papers that had the nerve to print the original Danish cartoons goes to trial for offending Muslims.
BY MICHAEL FREUND
The extent of support for global jihad is frightening in its proportions, and the numbers are anything but insignificant.
It's time we open our eyes and confront reality. Ever since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the media has sought to reassure us that only a tiny minority of Muslims actually support the use of violence against Israel and the West.
It's just a small fringe, a marginal few at best, they tell us, so don't worry about it all too much. One percent or three percent -- who cares? Just sit back, enjoy your morning eggs and coffee and have a nice day.
But a look at the numbers tells a very different story. The extent of support for global jihad is frightening in its proportions, and the numbers are anything but insignificant.
Consider, for example, the following statistics regarding support for suicide bombings and other types of terror attacks.
In a poll conducted five months ago, and broadcast on Britain's Channel 4 TV, nearly 25% of British Muslims said the July 7, 2005, terror bombings in London, which killed 52 innocent commuters, were justified. Another 30% said they would prefer to live under strict Islamic Sharia law rather than England's democratic system.
Now, one in four justifying terror may not be a majority, but it certainly isn't a "small fringe" either.
In other countries, the figures are no less unsettling. A survey published in December found that 44% of Nigerian Muslims believe suicide bombing attacks are "often" or "sometimes" acceptable. Only 28% said they were never justified.
According to the annual Pew Global Attitudes Survey, released in July 2006, "roughly one-in-seven Muslims in France, Spain and Great Britain feel that suicide bombings against civilian targets can at least sometimes be justified to defend Islam." The report also found that less than half of Jordan's Muslims believe terror attacks are never justified. In Egypt, only 45% of Muslims say terror is never justified.
Still think only a "tiny minority" are in favor of violence? In Israel, the percentages are even more alarming. After Cpl. Gilad Shalit was abducted by Hamas terrorists last summer, a poll conducted by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center revealed that 77.2% of Palestinians supported the kidnapping, while 66.8% said they would back additional such attacks.
More than six out of 10 Palestinians also said they were in favor of firing Kassam rockets at Israeli towns and cities.
And lest you think that war fever lay behind the results, consider this: four additional polls published in September, nearly a month after the Lebanese conflict had ended, all found large majorities of Palestinians backing terror attacks against the Jewish state.
Indeed, in various countries around the world, support for Muslim fundamentalist terror groups appears to be widespread.
On the fifth anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a survey conducted by Al-Jazeera asked respondents, "Do you support Osama Bin-Laden?" A whopping 49.9% answered: yes.
And the July 2006 global Pew survey found that among Muslims, a quarter of Jordanians, a third of Indonesians, 38% of Pakistanis and 61% of Nigerians all expressed confidence in the mass murderer who founded al-Qaida.
In Lebanon six months ago, the Beirut Center for Research and Information found that over 80% of the Lebanese population said they supported Hizbullah.
And do I need also to mention that a majority of Palestinians backed Hamas in parliamentary elections last year? Sure, there are also places where support for violent jihad is not as high. As Reuters reported on October 15, just 10 percent of Indonesian Muslims said they backed jihad and supported bomb attacks on the island of Bali aimed at foreign tourists.
But Indonesia is home to more than 200 million Muslims, so while 10 percent may sound like a small number percentage-wise, it is actually quite large in absolute terms. It means there are some 20 million Muslims in Indonesia alone who are willing to say out loud that they support the use of violence and terror against innocent human beings.
The longer we continue to underestimate the extent of the problem, the more difficult it will be to defeat it.
Since when is that a "marginal few"? The question of whether a "tiny" or "sizable" minority backs the global jihad is far more than just one of semantics. It goes to the very nature of the struggle that Israel and the West now find ourselves in.
The figures above, taken from a variety of nations, continents and contexts, all point in one very ominous direction. They demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that the global jihadist movement enjoys a wide and broad base of support that extends far beyond just a minuscule number of supporters.
Politicians and journalists might wish to believe, as we all do, that the backers of violent jihad are few and far between, and that they do not represent large numbers of people with like-minded extremist views. But that is simply not the case.
The arithmetic of jihad is quite straight-forward, and it is time we stopped looking the other way and pretending otherwise.
The threat posed by Islamic fundamentalism to Israel and the West can, and must, be met. With determination and a sense of purpose, victory is not out of reach.
But the longer we continue to underestimate the extent of the problem, the more difficult it will be to defeat it.
So let's put aside all that wishful thinking, and roll up our collective sleeves and get to work. Like it or not, the war on terror still faces a long road ahead.
This article originally appeared in the Jerusalem Post.
I found this article very interesting and scary, but not surprising at all. This is not about "Islamophobia" but about common sense.
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
Why give numbers? I don't know...no one keeps track of this stuff anyway.
Anyway, the Muzzie Moonbats in Mudville ('Kuala Lumpur' literally means 'Muddy River' in Malay) are having another high-profile 'anti-war' expo this week (as shown in this photo). Nothing really new to see here. So-called "American and Israeli war crimes" are re-exaggerated, re-animated, rehashed, retold, and recycled for an eager Malaysian/Muslim audience. Not to mention their Treasonist Leftist allies in the West who lap these fictitious tales without let up.
Of course, the many actual atrocities the Muslims commit against the infidels and each other (see here, here, here, here, and here for starters) are simply ignored...or blamed on the usual suspects (i.e. Great or Little Satan).
So, I was reading the usual Malay media adoration that passes for coverage of said expo. And near the end, I found a surprise. Namely, for our American audience. HINT--You never know where infamous, obnoxious former politicians may pop up.
Here's the article (CAUTION-- you are about to enter the Moonbat Cognitive Dissonance Zone):
KUALA LUMPUR: The United States would have demonised Buddhists if the land they inhabited had oil, a professor of economics said.
Ottawa University's Prof Michael Chossudovsky said the war on Iraq was actually a war of conquest to confiscate and control oil reserves.
He added that three-quarters of the oil reserves were in Muslim lands and only 4% was in Western countries, with the United States having 2%.
“If oil had been found in the lands inhabited by Buddhists, the United States would have demonised them to get control of the resource. The war on terror is a fabrication,” he said yesterday at the Expose War Crimes – Criminalise War conference organised by Perdana Global Peace Organisation.
He said plans to extend the war to Iran would cause the whole region to flare up, and that the objective to redraw the map of the Middle East was for the conquest of oil reserves.
Prof Chossudovsky said there had been more than 10 million casualties in US-sponsored wars all over the world.
He said some were covert, such as in Africa, where they financed both sides to fight each other in civil wars in order to take over the resources of the country later.
Another speaker, Cynthia McKinney, a former representative to the US House of Representatives, said impeaching US President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice was America’s roadmap back to dignity.
She noted that although the Democrats had taken over Congress, they had made it clear that they did not have plans to impeach the Republican president and have taken that out of the table.
Sunday, February 04, 2007
Well at least he has quit lying to 'his' party, the Democratic Party. Yes, America and my fellow Republicans, we didn't elect a Republican, we didn't elect a RINO, we elected a Democrat. The enemy within does not even pretend anymore.
Washington Times, "Bush builds bonds with Democrats at retreat
To a round of applause, the president said he will fight for a bill that does not deport illegal aliens. Mr. Bush said it would be a mistake to miss the opportunity for reform this year and let the issue enter the 2008 election campaign, when he worried it would become too political.
WILLIAMSBURG -- President Bush and House Democrats got off to a good start in finding common ground yesterday at the Democrats' annual retreat -- with Mr. Bush saying they even share a bond in having been shot in the back by Republicans on immigration. "You are not the only one with arrows in your back," the president said during a closed-door question-and-answer session with the House Democratic Caucus, according to two individuals who were in the room.
He was responding to Rep. Luis Gutierrez, Illinois Democrat, who said Republicans had been merciless during last year's elections in attacking Democrats on border security. He asked Mr. Bush to win more Republican support for the Democrats' preferred bill.
To a round of applause, the president said he will fight for a bill that does not deport illegal aliens. Mr. Bush said it would be a mistake to miss the opportunity for reform this year and let the issue enter the 2008 election campaign, when he worried it would become too political.
An alleged quip about the Prophet's penis led to torture and 13-years in jail in Saudi Arabia.
by Brian Whitaker
Hadi Saeed al-Mutif grew up in the countryside in southern Saudi Arabia and at the age of 18 started training to become a policeman. Two months into his training, Hadi had gathered with other recruits for afternoon prayers, as required by the rules. "Let us pray upon the Prophet .." the Imam said - at which point Hadi allegedly quipped: "... and upon his penis".
A couple of his fellow recruits reported Hadi to the authorities at the training centre and he was ordered to stand under the Saudi flag for two hours as a punishment.
That might have been the end of the matter, except that a military inspector happened to be visiting at the time. Instead, this silly incident set in motion a train of events which is still continuing after almost 13 years, involving every level of Saudi Arabia's Byzantine justice system and even reaching the ears of the king.
Throughout this process, one factor that seems to be constantly relevant is that Hadi comes from Najran - an ethnically and culturally different part of the kingdom - and is a Shia Muslim from the Ismaili branch, which many in the Saudi religious and legal establishment regard as heretical.
Hadi denies using the words he is alleged to have uttered, but the quip about the Prophet's penis is not totally unheard of, at least in some circles. I have been unable to find out much about its origin and usage, but it seems to be something that laddish types say to make their mates snigger at an inappropriate moment - a bit like the occasionally irreverent antics of choirboys in Christian churches.
At least two other cases of people getting into trouble for using exactly the same phrase have been documented in Saudi Arabia. In one case a high school student (also Ismaili) was reported by his teacher and received a 14-year jail sentence with 4,000 lashes.
From the training centre, Hadi was taken to the local police station where the officers scratched their heads over what to do about him. After detaining him for 13 days, they unburdened themselves by handing him over to the Mabahith, the kingdom's domestic intelligence service.
During his 25 days in the custody of the Mabahith, according to Hadi's account, he was tortured with beatings and sleep deprivation. Finally, a judge arrived and ordered him to sign a confession - which he refused to do.
He then spent a year in military detention awaiting trial. After hearing two or three witnesses and holding six court sessions, the judge decided Hadi was guilty and sentenced him to death.
Two appeals followed - one to a court in Mecca and another to the Supreme Judicial Council. Both were rejected, and in both cases the judges' views on the religious inadequacy of Ismaili Muslims seem to have been a major factor.
In a final bid to save his life, Hadi's family made an appeal for mercy to the acting monarch at the time, Crown Prince Abdullah, who ordered a special committee to look into the case.
In fact, three committees became involved: a judicial committee, an administrative committee and a forensic committee.
For the purposes of the forensic committee, Hadi spent six months in a psychiatric facility in Ta'if, where he says they took pity on him. They concluded that he was suffering from depression and psychosis and had not been responsible for his actions at the time of the alleged incident. This was attributed to an earlier traumatic experience when he witnessed the gruesome death of his grandmother - accidentally chopped up by a haymaking machine.
The judicial committee, however, over-ruled the forensic committee and decided that Hadi should be punished in a way that would set an example for others.
Crown Prince Abdullah has since become king and six months ago Hadi's father, together with a local sheikh from Najran, managed to secure an audience with him. The king expressed a desire to find a solution; some say he commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment - though no one seems entirely sure.
Hadi is now 31. Thirteen years after allegedly making a stupid remark he is still in jail, with his future unresolved.