Islam and Islamic terrorists have declared war upon the West and Dar al Harb. Inexplicably, the world treats each attack separately, and not part of a larger war. What else do Islamic terrorists have to do to be dealt with as the global menace they truly are?
The latest attacks have occurred in the heart of Mumbai, India's commercial and chief financial center, as well as a major tourist destination. News reports are sketchy at this early hour, but the media is reporting that "gunmen" have made coordinated attacks in at least nine separate locations, including train stations, five-star hotels, restaurants and even hospitals. As I write this, the Taj Hotel, a major five star hotel for western tourists in Mumbai, is under siege and on fire (see photo).
The "gunmen" apparently targeted Westerners, particularly Americans and Brits, and may be holding hostages in at least two major hotels in central Mumbai. The death toll is at least 78 with hundreds more injured. The terrorists have detonated bombs, fired automatic weapons and used grenades on large crowds. The police were attacked head on as well, and the top anti terror police officer in Mumbai is among the dead.
The media may only be using the generic term "gunmen" for the moment. However, from the deadly modus operandi, coordinated assaults and the targets selected, it's clear the murdering b*stards must be followers of the Religion of PeaceTM.
How should infidels respond? Belmont Club writer Richard Fernandez writes:
Now maybe if Israel just withdrew from Gaza, the West Bank or simply vanished from the face of the earth, none of this would happen. Or maybe if the West apologized for something, anything, name it … then none of this would happen. Try anything, because the alternative is to resist. And that will never do.
Perhaps we should all advocate Mr. Ghazi's dystopian vision for a global Caliphate and for everyone to convert to Wahhabi Islam. That should definitely address the 'root causes' of Islamic terrorism. Shouldn't it?