Make Way for the Mega-Mosque
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)
Islam not just a religion -- Islam is a totalitarian political machine of bloodthirsty conquest which zealously advocates the downfall of all non Muslim governments, in particular the U.S. government.
RELIGIOUS INTELLIGENCE: LEGISLATION has been brought by the government of President Mahmoud Amadinejad before the Iranian Majlis that would mandate the death penalty for apostates from Islam. The law’s reach would be worldwide, the legislation says.
The Washington think tank, the Institute on Religion and Public Policy reported on Feb 5 the proposed “Bill for Islamic Penal” law will be the first time that Iran has by statute mandated the death penalty for conversion from Islam.
The legislation used the word “Hadd -- meaning that it explicitly sets death as a fixed punishment that cannot be changed, reduced or annulled. In the past, the death penalty has been handed down, and also carried out, in apostasy cases, but it has never before been set down in law,” the Institute’s president, Joseph Grieboski said. Iran introduces law that imposes death penalty on converts >>> By George Conger
Hat tip: Jim Ball
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)
See part one here.
My friend at Youtube is back with a reply:
You sound more like a Jew to me but we have no problem with Jews our problem is with Zionism.
Then you should consider these, mostly the people who end up in hell are arrogant ones:
"And if anyone contends with the Messenger even after guidance has been plainly conveyed to him, and follows a path other than that becoming to men of Faith, We shall leave him in the path he has chosen, and land him in Hell - what an evil destination!" Qur'an, 4:115
Abraham was neither a "Jew" nor a "Christian", but was a pious Muslim; and he was not of those who ascribe divinity to aught beside Him. (Glorious Qur'an
[6:112] Likewise did We make for every Messenger an enemy,- evil ones among men and jinn, inspiring each other with flowery discourses by way of deception. If thy Lord had so planned, they would not have done it: so leave them and their inventions alone.
Thou wilt find the most vehement mankind in hostility to those who believe (to be) the Jews and idolaters. And thou wilt find the nearest of them in affection to those who believe (to be) those who say; Lo! We are Christians... (Qur'an 5:82)
As for the unbelievers their deeds are like a mirage in a sandy desert, which the man parched with thirst mistakes for water, until when he comes up to it, he finds it to be nothing: but he finds Allah (ever)with him, and Allah will pay him back in full: and Allah is swift in reckoning ( Sura un-Nur, 39).
Hey rock worshipper:
What, no swearing, no expletives hurled in my general direction this time? Are you trying to insult and denigrate a lowly kufr like myself, or 'revert' me to your wicked ideology that masquerades as a religion?
As for me being Jewish, no I don't have that particular, although I do have many good Jewish friends.
So, that's the best you can manage? Being a cut and paste bandit? You know, as an educated infidel, I can cut and paste from your useless koran also. Try these cut 'n pastes on for size:
***About Those Annoying Non-Believers (Infidels, Pagans, Jews, Christians, etc.)
Qur’an 9:123 “murder them and treat them harshly”
Qur’an 3.28 Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual coming.
NOTE: By ‘guarding carefully’, a Muslim should deceive the infidel. Acting as a friend is fine as long as it is to benefit the Muslim and protect Islam.
There are literally hundreds of verses like this in the koran and hadith that are vile and filled with hatred, literally too many to list them all as they would fill a book. They already do anyway-- it's called the koran.
So, what is it gonna be for your next mail to me, genius? More cut and paste from that boring and murderous 'holy' book of yours? More choice insults, perchance? How about sending me some more grammatical and spelling errors of yours? We all find those quite entertaining.
The Anti Jihadist
Occasionally, I get a message sent to my Youtube account, usually in regards to the one video I put up on behalf of a fellow counterjihadist some time ago. The video, while a bit blunt, is dead on target about Islam. And hence, it never fails from time to time to attract attention from certain individuals.
I got this gem of wisdom today from (evidently) one of the many fans of the Jihad at Youtube:
|From:|| voiceofreasoning [videos (0) | favorites (134) | friends (25)] |
|Sent:||February 22, 2008|
Dear Mr. voiceofreasoning:
Phonographic addiction? Nothing wrong with liking record players, although that is a bit old fashion nowadays. Do you prefer 30s or 45s?
Now what religion do you think I am? The important thing is, that I am not now, nor will I ever be, a muslim.
You wouldn't by chance be a follower of the Moon God allah (lower case intentional), would you? If so, you have my profound and sincere condolences.
Clearly, you are a genius and I am not worthy of your godlike and rapacious intellect. Please do regale me soon with more of your, ahem, 'wisdom'.
The Anti Jihadist
Now that Imam Bush and his sidekick Clueless Condi and the Eurabian DhimmiElites have kicked off world wide secession fever, it's time for Slobodan Milosevic to speak from the grave (again):
(Circa 2004, Observations at Slobodan's Hague Trial)
At the opening of the trial when Milosevic presented pictures of beheaded Serbs and Judge May said that is irrelevant. Milosevic said:
"It's not on the screens that the public sees. Right. I see it on this screen now. But this internal screen only. So he is holding a head, the head of a Serb that he cut off. So those are the 20.000 Mujahedin that were brought to the European theatre of war through Clinton's policy, and most of them remained there and some went to America and to other countries, and they went all around Europe. And then when they start beheading your own people in wars to come, then you will know what this is all about."
Today we're happy to unveil the latest look at Pedestrian Infidel. It's all still the same basic stuff, just in a flashier coating. We hope that our small but devoted fan base likes what they see.
If anyone has any comments on the site revamp, or you just wanna get something off your chest, leave your fawning remarks here or shoot us a mail. Any and all feedback is appreciated, even from Obama fans.
El Jefe Maximo has at last stepped aside. Fidel Castro, the perennial darling of the left, Euro-ninnies, and American-haters the world over, has resigned his post as Cuba's leader. It seems that time does not stand still, even in the time warp that is Cuba. If Fidel is being forced to quit his position of 'El Presidente for life', one has to assume that the end for him is near indeed, who is looking increasingly aged and frail (see the pic for a recent shot of Fidel). And not a moment too soon.
Fidel is apparently going to let his younger brother Raul officially take over the so-called 'Cuban Revolution'. Raul, of course, is no spring chicken himself-- he's 76. What Raul might do, especially after his older brother departs, is hard to say. As long as either Castro brother is alive, I doubt that genuine freedom and democracy can come to that long-suffering island ninety miles south of Florida.
Anti-Castro Cubans in Miami, and freedom lovers anywhere, cannot wait for El Jefe to shuffle off this mortal coil. Neither can we.
Not really much of a feat. McCain was healed of any conservative disease he had years ago. Now about that cancer growing on his face..... Doesn't McCain look pathetic and ill and should be saying "Popa!...Popa!"
From Saudi Barbaria:
The New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a statement that the kingdom's religious police who arrested and interrogated Fawza Falih, and the judges who tried her in the northern town of Quraiyat never gave her the opportunity to prove her innocence in the face of "absurd charges that have no basis in law."
Falih's case underscores shortcomings in Saudi Arabia's Islamic legal system in which rules of evidence are shaky, lawyers are not always present and sentences often depend on the whim of judges.
Tonight I saw this article ("Australian security agencies recruit foxes to guard henhouse", JihadWatch) on this guy Robert Lambert, a former Scotland Yard 'expert' on Muslim community relations. Basically he is telling Australia to hire radical imams to help 'understand Islam' and 'direct the yutes.' So who is Robert Lambert? It took some Google searching, but I did find a posting from the IHRC, the Isamic Human Rights Commission. The IHRC is based in England, and Clown Yvonne Ridley is of course a member. You remember Yvonne, the loser journalist who was captured, and converted and now is a media pig eager to trash the West and her home country England, those vile infidels! Anyway, they had a meeting, the nutty jews were there, UberDhimmi George Galloway, and a bunch of other cultural jihadists. Of course, Dhimmi Lambert was there accepting an award. The summary of the meeting relates the award section and comments from Lambert.
IHRC Convention 2007
At the end of his talk, Raza did recognize one particular individual in the police force who he described as "fighting for justice" within the police to try and not demonize the Muslim community:
In all of that - insincerity, lies, deception, there was one guy that I met, i was speaking about him after wards I said he seems like a nice guy but he's a copper.. over a number of years, some of the cases we have fought for, we would not have been able to get the help to the Muslim community without the crucial support of that particular individual and the team he was in effect leading, and sometimes I asked the question are you part of the good cop bad cop routine where you are the good guy and we get beaten up by the other people, the Muslim community that is gets beaten up by the other people. And over the years one thing I felt very strongly, within the Islamic Human Rights Commission we felt, the sincerity with which the cause for justice has been fought for within the police to try and not demonize the Muslim community by the papers that individual has written, by the comments that individual has written has in effect made us think on the fact that he is no longer going to be with the police any longer.. [IHRC] needs to acknowledge and say a gesture of thanks for the work that he has done in order to help the IHRC to help the Muslim community.. I would like to invite Detective Inspector Robert Lambert to the stage to receive a gesture of out thanks for the help he has given..
I've been to many Islamic Human Rights Commission functions - Islamophobia Awards - often the Metropolitan Police has been in strong contention and indeed I remember one year telling the head of our diversity department at New Scotland Yard, I said we've won an award at the Islamophobia Awards. He said "Good, Bob, things are looking up!" I said "No, its  not that kind of award.."
There has been a lot of arm twisting and condemnation to the many members of the Republican Party who have said, including me, that "We will not vote for McCain." Don Feder has an excellent summary of the 10 Reasons not to vote for McCain. To me, it is better to have the Republican Party crash and burn with McCain at the helm. Sometimes, destruction can give rebirth with great vigor. Sometimes, the victim dies. So be it. I will not vote for McCain and I will not give any money to the Republican Party. I will vote for and financially support those Repubicans who align themselves with me. There will be no change.
I was checking out Andrew Bostom's website and this picture struck me as particularly funny. Can you tell the difference between them?
Here's an interesting phone conversation that Usama Dakdok at SonsofApesandPigs had with the United Church of Christ. Pretty funny.
Press Release: America is being fooled by Barak Hussein Obama!!
By ibn Misr on February 15, 2008 12:44 AM | Email this entry | Permalink | Comments (17) | TrackBacks (0)
We ask for your immediate attention, and viral dissemination of this news.
America is being fooled by Barak Hussein Obama!!
"YES, MUSLIMS ARE MEMBERS IN OUR CHURCH." "WE HAVE MANY MEMBERS IN OUR CHURCH WHO ARE MUSLIMS."
I am Usama K. Dakdok, President of The Straight Way of Grace Ministry. I am invited by churches all over America to speak about ISLAM and its threat to America and the West.
I have had concerns about Senator Obama,s honesty regarding his so called Christian faith.
I called The United Church of Christ in Chicago Illinois, where Senator Obama is a member. If Senator Obama were indeed a Christian, he would be regarded as an "Apostate" which according to Islamic Law, would mean he would be subject to a death warrant imposed upon anyone who leaves Islam, according to the Prophet Mohammed. Many muslims who have left Islam have been murdered on this basis worldwide. Putting Islamic law aside, Obama would still be condemned by Islam. However, in Senator Obama's instance, Muslims in America are joyously happy to think that Obama would be a Muslim President in the white House. Obama is deceiving America. Muslims would not be endorsing a Muslim who left Islam and became a Christian.
It is important to note that I had four witnesses to this telephone conversation with his church. The date, time and length of the entire conversation can be verified by phone records. The following is the conversation I had with the church, regarding his membership there.
"My name is Usama, and I am from Egypt. I am interested in joining the church. I need to ask some questions please." The operator directed me to the membership office. I proceeded to ask questions that only a Muslim would ask. "What is the difference between Baptists and your church?" She responded, " We believe exactly what Baptists believe." My second question was, "How big is your church and what kind of church is it?" She responded, "We are a Black African American Church and we have 6000 members. I asked, "Do I have to attend Sunday school classes or other meetings to be a member?" She answered "No." I asked, "Do I have to be baptized to join the church?" She again answered, "No." I asked, "Do I have to pay a membership Fee to join?" Her answer was No. I then asked her what I needed to do to join. She told me that I needed to attend two Sunday School classes in a row and then I would walk the aisle. I replied, "That sounds easy. One last question please. IF I AM MUSLIM AND I BELIEVE IN PROPHET MOHAMMED, PEACE BE UPON HIM AND I ALSO BELIEVE IN JESUS, PEACE BE UPON HIM, DO I HAVE TO GIVE UP MY ISLAMIC FAITH TO BE A MEMBER IN YOUR CHURCH?" SHE ANSWERED, "NO. WE HAVE MANY MUSLIM MEMBERS IN OUR CHURCH." It is important to note that Muslims would not attend church.
I asked her, "Is that how Senator Barak Hussein Obama became a member?" There was silence. I went on and stated that his father and step father were Muslims, his grandfathers and grandmother are Muslims, his uncles and aunts, nephews and nieces and cousins are Muslims and everyone in his family in Kenya are Muslims. She replied to me, "I am sorry, I cannot answer these questions for you." I of course sensed she was uncomfortable. I ended the conversation by saying to her, "YOUR CHURCH HAS DONE GREAT HARM TO THIS COUNTRY BY COVERING A WOLF IN SHEEPS CLOTHING AND THAT WOLF IS SENATOR BORAK HUSSEIN OBAMA." End of phone call.
This is fraud to the people of the United States of America.
P.S. I am willing to expose this to the media in all outlets. God Bless America
Send inquiries to SonsofApesAndpigs@gmail.com
The Muezzin’s call to prayer, al-Adhan (the ‘dh’ is pronounced as a ‘heavy’ ‘th’ as in ‘thee’) is a particularly mournful drone to sensitive Western ears. It is a most unfortunate din, one feels. Is this what we want in our own towns and villages? Somehow, I doubt it; yet it might well be coming to Oxford very shortly!
Play the following genuine call of the muezzin. I think you will agree that it doesn’t have the happy tones of the peeling of church bells. But then, no one said that the Qur’an was ‘the Good News’, or Gospel. On the contrary, the Qur’an is full of doom and gloom; so we shouldn’t be surprised when the call to prayer in Islam also sounds mournful, also sounds as though the muezzin is in agony! Listen here; see what you think:
Poor Hillary. She hasn't won a primary/caucus since Super Tuesday and Obama has now surged ahead in the delegate count. What's a Clinton to do?
Sure, it may be a bit premature to be writing Hillary's political epitaph, but the schadenfreude is just too much for PI to resist.
Here's a photo of Hillary on the campaign trail, trying to keep her presidential bid on track. Any of our readers want to try to caption this gem of a pic?
So Condi and Euro elites at the UN plan to unilaterally recognize Kosovo as independent from Serbia despite Russia's objections. After all, by their 'thinking', they are showing the Muslims their love and respect, i.e., their appeasement. By the same thinking, shouldn't they help Mexico reclaim the Southwest US? How about Dearborn being declared an independent Muslim state in America? That would help Muslim relations a lot! Shouldn't any area of any country that has a majority ethnic group that is at odds with the country's majority ethnic group have the right and the assistance of the UN and the US to declare their independence. It's only fair.
UN holds special Kosovo meeting
Nato's 16,000-strong force will continue working in Kosovo
The UN Security Council will hold a closed meeting on Thursday to discuss Kosovo, which is expected to declare independence from Serbia within days.
The meeting is being held at the request of Serbia, which has expressed strong opposition to any attempt by Kosovo to break away.
Serbia's ambassador to the UN told the BBC that Belgrade would refrain from retaliatory measures against Kosovo.
The US and many EU countries plan to recognise Kosovo's independence.
Serbia's UN ambassador Pavle Jevremovic said the Security Council "must remain part of, let's say, the mechanism handling the crisis, and must be aware what is going on, because after all, a unilateral declaration of independence will bring about the partition of Serbia".
"No country can accept so lightly dismemberment," he added.
Russia is backing Serbia on Kosovo.
President Vladimir Putin told a news conference on Thursday that "support for a unilateral declaration of independence by Kosovo is not moral and not legal".
Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said secession would be a mistake and everything possible should be done to "prevent negative developments".
Kosovo is expected to make an independence declaration on Sunday or Monday.
The United Nations has administered Kosovo since a Nato bombing campaign in 1999 drove out Serb forces accused of persecuting the province's majority ethnic Albanians.
A civilian police and justice mission for Kosovo is expected to be given the go-ahead by EU member states by the end of the week.
A senior official told the BBC's Oana Lungescu in Brussels that deployment of the 1,800 staff would be staggered over four months.
By early June, 1,500 police officers including special anti-riot units and 250 judges, prosecutors and customs officials would be in place to maintain stability in the self-proclaimed state.
The police and judges are expected to come from Germany and Italy as well as other countries, including the United States, Turkey, Croatia, Norway and Switzerland.
DAILY EXPRESS: FIVE young British Muslims who were convicted of terror charges have walked free today.
The students, who were jailed last year for downloading extremist propaganda, were freed by the Court of Appeal this afternoon.
They had been described by the Old Bailey judge who sentenced them as being "intoxicated" by jihad websites and literature.
But today Chief Justice Lord Phillips quashed their convictions and ordered their release, saying the convictions were unsafe as there was no proof of terrorist intent. Five British Muslims Convicted of Terror Charge Are Freed >>> By Julia White
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)
In a hastily arranged press conference earlier today, the Malaysian Prime Minister (after denying he would do so only 24 hours prior) dissolved the country's parliament. In Malaysia's Westminster-derived parliamentary system, this is a necessary precursor to holding a General Election (GE). My sources tell me the next GE is scheduled to take place on (or around) March 1, a scant 17 days from now. In stark contrast to the Americans, who prepare and carry on in electoral mode for 2+ years, the Malaysians prefer something much shorter.
A GE sooner rather than later, and a short election season, tend to favor Malaysia's Islamist-inclined ruling party. Even the chuckleheads in charge of Malay Supremacy Party (UMNO) realize that their man in the PM's office gets more and more unpopular with each passing month. Additionally, as more time passes, the more time the enfeebled opposition has to prepare.
The UMNO fascists, despite themselves, do have some well-honed political instincts. After all, you can't run the country continuously for over 50 years unless you have some idea what you're doing. Despite the shenanigans with this GE, my sources tell me that the "fix is already in", with the formidable UMNO machine already in place, its manpower and money deployed and in position to pound their fragmented opponents. Expect the official announcement of the GE to be withheld until the last possible moment.
This GE is a chance for Malaysians to vote in a less corrupt and a less Islamist-inclined government. However, I expect that this heady possibility will not come to pass. The majority of voters here in fair Malaysia, both living and dead, are Muslims, and you can depend on the fact that the vast majority of Muslims will vote for their own.
In the interest of human values and universal love, we direct this petition to the World Court for judgment.
We, the undersigned international petitioners, request a ban on the organization called Islam. We request this ban due to the criminal acts of its founder, Mohammed, and the Koran's doctrines with presently legitimizes the criminal acts of PEDOPHILIA, ASSASSINATIONS, THE OPPRESSION OF WOMEN by suppressing their human rights, THE PENALTIES OF STONING AND DISMEMBERMENT, and THE UTILIZATION OF TERROR AS A WEAPON OF INTIMIDATION AND CONTROL.
Sign this petition here.
This is the best, most devastating rebuttal I have seen yet to the Archdhimmi of Canterbury's suggestion that Sharia should be allowed to exist in the U.K. And in an even more ironic twist, the writer of this rebuttal is a Muslim.
What Rowan Williams wishes upon us is an abomination and I write here as a modern Muslim woman. He lectures the nation on the benefits of sharia law – made by bearded men, for men – and wants the alternative legal system to be accommodated within our democracy in the spirit of inclusion and cohesion.
Pray tell me sir, how do separate and impenetrable courts and schools and extreme female segregation promote commonalities and deep bonds between citizens of these small isles?
What he did on Thursday was to convince other Britons, white, black and brown, that Muslims want not equality but exceptionalism and their own domains. Enlightened British Muslims quail. Friends like this churchman do us more harm than our many enemies. He passes round what he believes to be the benign libation of tolerance. It is laced with arsenic.
He would not want his own girls and women, I am sure, to "choose" to be governed by these laws he breezily endorses. And he is naive to the point of folly if he imagines it is possible to pick and choose the bits that are relatively nice to the girls or ones that seem to dictate honourable financial transactions.
Look around the Islamic world where sharia rules and, in every single country, these ordinances reduce our human value to less than half that is accorded a male; homosexuals are imprisoned or killed, children have no free voice or autonomy, authoritarianism rules and infantilises populations.
What's more, different Muslim nations claim to have their own allegedly god-given sharia. In Saudi Arabia, women cannot drive (What in Allah's name could the Koran have warned about cars?). In Bangladesh and Pakistan, they have no such bar to driving, although increasingly Saudi Wahabi Islam is taking over and we see Saudi sharia taking hold.
It is growing in influence here, too. Ten years ago, the only fully shrouded Muslim women around were from the Arab fiefdoms, the many wives of sheikhs often drawn by cartoonists to convey the absurdity and inhumanity of such cloaks. Now all of Europe has these girls and women rendering themselves invisible in public spaces. It is their elected sharia, so they claim without credibility. There is no agreed body of sharia, it is all drafted by males and the most cruel is now claiming absolute authority.
In Pakistan, on the statutes are strictures on adultery introduced by the military dictator Zia ul-Haq. Women activists in that country have given their lives protesting against the injustice of those laws where women suspected of adultery, or rape victims, are punished in hideous ways and the man goes free.
The Iranian theocracy changes its regulations from year to year, capriciously playing with the lives of females. The morality police hound women and girls, beat them up, imprison them for showing an ankle, walking too provocatively or singing in the streets. They fight back but are ground down eventually.
Two Iranian friends chose to die rather than live under the demeaning religious orders. Go to Afghanistan if you fancy a 12-year-old bride – a practice approved by the mullahs. That's sharia for you. Many women, gay men and dissidents came to Britain to escape Islamic tyrants and their laws. Dr Williams supports those laws and, by default, makes the refugees victims again.
Four years ago, a Saudi woman in her fifties came to my home. She was divorced from a Saudi prince who had sent her away and kept her children. What she said about sharia cannot be repeated. She had money, this princess, but no parental rights and she howled like a child in excruciating pain in my living room.
Yet, family disputes, says Dr Williams, would be easier, within sharia. For whom exactly? The polygamous men who live in this country, yes, certainly. Not for their wives who will be told that God intends them to lower their eyes and accept unjust verdicts.
Many will be sent back to bastard husbands or flinty-eyed mullahs will take their children away. In Bradford and Halifax, they may be forbidden to drive or work where men are employed. Adultery will be punished. I don't think we will have public stonings but violence of some sort will be meted out (it already is) with lawmakers' backing.
Sensing the drift in their direction, British sharia "experts" today shamelessly direct female medical students not to wash their forearms, essential to prevent the spread of infections, because that exposes their flesh.
Does the Archbishop even know that sharia comes in many guises and that several schools of jurisprudence have their own versions? The list is long – Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi, Hanbali, Jafari, Salafi and on and on. Ayatollah Khomeini preferred his DIY set of crimes and punishments when he came to power.
No women are allowed to be imams or serious jurists, so cannot help make their own fair and free set of female-friendly sharia. All the systems insist on ultimate truths, hard certainties. Sharia cannot provide solutions to the complex challenges of modern life and many violate fundamental human rights as established by the United Nations.
Taj Hargey, a historian and Islamic theologian, runs the Muslim Education Centre in Oxford. He, with me, is a trustee of British Muslims For Secular Democracy which is attempting to educate Muslims out of authorised obscurantism and non-Muslims into a better understanding of the progressive and evolutionary nature of the practice of Islam.
He is incandescent that Dr Williams backs a perilous Islamic conservatism, already too powerful in Britain: "Sharia is nothing but a human concoction of medieval religious opinion, largely archaic and outmoded and irrelevant to life today. Most sharia contradicts the letter and spirit of the Koran, distorts the transcendental text."
During his sermons Dr Hargey explains to congregations that, for example there is no blasphemy in the Koran, that the Prophet himself allowed a man to mock the divine revelations. Apostasy, says the holy text, will be dealt with by Allah in the afterlife. Sharia policemen insist apostates should be tortured and killed.
Dr Williams says Muslims want the choice to opt for sharia. What he believes to be choice is, in truth, inner compulsion, the result of brainwashing which begins in the madrassas when girls and boys are young enough to mould.
I have often admired the Archbishop's lofty thoughts, his intellectualism, the passion for human rights, his guts when the Government needs to be chastised. But this time his kind indulgences betray his own invaluable principles and deliver Muslim women, girls and dissidents into the hands of religious persecutors – an unforgivable intervention, which I hope he now sincerely regrets.
To paraphase Animal Farm, ArchDhimmi of Canterbury said
"An approach to law which simply said - there's one law for everybody - I think that's a bit of a danger." (melanie Philips, The Archbishop's speech, The Spectator, Feb. 8,2008)
Got that? Duly noted.
I have never posted or referenced a Pat Buchanan article. But this past week, Pat posted an article called "Tapped Out Nation" that is a brilliant summary of our state of the union. This fantasy world that Bush lives in, that Democrats thrive in, that so called Republicans wallow in will collapse, but not quickly, it's going to be a painful experience. After the Republicans said McCain is the man to lead us after Bush, I said enough. This is madness. I'm a Republican and I wanted Romney and I will never vote for McCain. Why should I kick myself in the ass for four more years, saying to myself "Could Hillary or Obama be any worse?" Been there. Done that. It reminds me of this quote I read and I realised is the essence of why we are in the 'state' we are in today. It feeds on itself, excessive immigration, multicultural demands, 'justice' for all groups, equality of cultures; all demanding benefits and accomodations and financial support. Of course we are not a true democracy, we are a Republic, but as the central government grows, we are becoming more and more a democracy - the liberal, nanny state version, of course vs what? ... a dictatorship that thinks it is benevolent (truly, it does). Is there much difference?
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.
- Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee (October 15, 1747 - January 5, 1813)
“Democracy… while it lasts is more bloody than either [aristocracy or monarchy]. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.”
Only a matter of some days ago, we learnt that the United Kingdom is to recognize polygamous marriages. This, of course, is to accommodate the Muslims. The taxpayer will have to pick up the tab. It will hasten the Islamization of our once great country, since more and more children will be born, at taxpayers' expense, to Muslim families.
Now, today, we get this nonsense from the Archbishop of Canterbury! One could be forgiven for believing that the political élite are involved in some sort of conspiracy to undermine the system!
As the Archbishop of Canterbury, and being the leader of the Anglican Communion worldwide, this man should be upholding Christian values, not Islamic ones. If the leader of the Anglican Communion doesn't defend Christian values, then who can we expect to do it?
But instead of that, this weak, cowardly, fawning man chooses to side with the very religion which is engaged in a war against the West, against Judeo-Christian civilization, against all that Christianity stands for. This is really quite, quite unbelievable!
The churches are emptying more with each passing day; yet all this man can think of doing is standing up for Muslims, the Christian Church's traditional archenemy.
What this man should be doing is preaching that there is no salvation other than through the Lord Jesus Christ, for that is what a true Christian is supposed to believe. He therefore should be spending his time trying to figure out how to fill the empty churches again. After all is said and done, isn't that the raison d'être of an archbishop in the first place? To fill churches.
Muslims need no help to establish Shariah law in the UK; indeed, it is already operating in many no-go areas throughout Europe, including the UK. Moreover, there is no doubt about it that it will spread, because there is nobody in power strong enough, or determined enough, to stop Islam and Shariah taking root.
Does the Archbishop of Canterbury not realize that each and every country which Islam has ever entered, and has been allowed to put down roots, it has eventually taken over? Each and every single one of them! There is only one exception to this rule, and that was Moorish Spain. But it took the Spaniards over five hundred years to reclaim their land for themselves, and there was much bloodshed in the process, much bloodshed in the 'Reconquista'.
Is this what we want for our country? Is this the legacy we wish to bequeath to our children?
It seems to me that the best thing that this Archbishop can do is hang his head in shame, and resign. The already weakened Church can do without his sort. Moreover, he must surely realize that Muslims deny the Christ, they deny the crucifixion, they deny Jesus as the Son of God. So they would do him out of a job straightaway. Muslims are not in the habit of compromising; it's their way or no way.
BBC: The Archbishop of Canterbury says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK "seems unavoidable".Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Dr Rowan Williams told Radio 4's World at One that the UK has to "face up to the fact" that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system.
Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion.
For example, Muslims could choose to have marital disputes or financial matters dealt with in a Sharia court.
He says Muslims should not have to choose between "the stark alternatives of cultural loyalty or state loyalty". Sharia law in UK is 'unavoidable' >>>
LISTEN TO THIS OUTRAGEOUS BBC AUDIO:
The Archbishop of Canterbury on the ‘Unavoidability’ of Sharia Law
The End of One Law for All?
At last, in the long winded American electoral season, 'Super Tuesday' has arrived. With four viable candidates still in the offing, today's multiple primaries across the country should narrow the field somewhat, and will probably reveal front runners in one or both parties by the time all the votes are in.
But how do these candidates address the Jihad? While 'national security' gets a lot of play as an 'issue' on the stump, the pernicious ideology of Jihad, as well as Jihad's centrality to the entire belief system of Islam, gets little or no attention. The Lamestream Media, as usual, is of no help and does not ask the insightful questions of these candidates that should be asked.
Of the four serious candidates left, I think Romney has the best understanding of the threat of Jihad, so he gets my vote. McCain is like Bush on this--i.e. Islam is 'peaceful' and the terrorists are a small extreme minority--what rubbish.
Our own John Sobieski said it best in September 2006, when he wrote of Romney:
...one and only one of the Republican contenders gets it and really understands. That is Mitch Romney. In an article by Diana West, she quotes Romney regarding his opposition to using Mass. taxpayer money to protect Khatami - "State taxpayers should not be providing special treatment to an individual who supports violent jihad and the destruction of Israel." It is just another point in Romney's favor. He has made blunt statements about Islam that can give one hope that this muddled fog our government works under will lift if he becomes President.
Once Inside Islam, No-one Gets OutIn April last year I wrote on the totalitarian aspects of Malaysia's society. Since that time, the situations described then have been repeated, and appear to have worsened.
THE POST (PAKISTAN): LAHORE: After the unveiling of a Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders' conspiracy against Islam by Channel 5, the Foreign Office declared they would take the matter to Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC).
Foreign Office spokesman Muhammad Sadiq, in an exclusive interview with Channel 5, said Pakistan had informed the Dutch government about the severity of the outcomes of this plot. We will take the matter to European Union, Pope Benedict and several other forums. Dutch MP’s anti-Islam movie | Issue to be taken up with OIC: FO >>>
Mark Alexander (Paperback)
Mark Alexander (Hardback)
You know how Charles JOhnson became obsessed with the cross in the background of antijihadists, and anyone who has it is a 'racist!' Well this painting from the 19th Century of the great warrior Charles Martel has it visible in the top left corner. Is he a racist Charles?
Picture from Mark's A New Dark Age is Dawning referencing LA Times book article
The Independent is running an online petition to save the young Afghan, Sayed Pervez Kambaksh, who has been sentenced to death in Afghanistan simply for downloading material on women’s rights!
We really need to do all we can to save this young man. He deserves OUR help. The least we can do is sign the online petition. Please take a minute of your time to sign this most urgent petition: