Thursday, September 30, 2010

The Backstreet Bedouin-boys

They're all the rage in Riyadh.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

The Slaves of Allah

In the backward religion of Islam, the greatest success that a Muslim believer can achieve in life is being a slave. Muhammad told his blind followers that they *must* become the "slaves of Allah" or be tortured in hell fire for eternity. He also promised them plenty of booty in both this life and the next.

Fortunately, the Muslims are slowly beginning to accept the fact that there IS NO cruel Islamic god named Allah and that they are in reality simply the SLAVES OF MUHAMMAD'S CULT.

If Islam were a peaceful and respectable religion that was a benefit to humanity, there would be nothing wrong with dedicating ones life to it. But of course this is not the case. In reality Islam does not ultimately produce good results for Muslims or anyone else.

In fact the Islamic religion without exception produces certain collective disaster for the Muslims. Islam has always failed Muslims, and it will always fail Muslims for as long as the followers of this pathetic cult continue to practice and enforce its cruel dictates. Islamic ideology produces the worst end result that one could possibly imagine. Islam is a vicious cult that creates a blinding slave mentality among Muslims.

As stated above, Muhammad has in reality made the Muslims HIS slaves. From the grave this evil mad man still has control over the minds of Muslims. Muslims live in fear of his most evil book the unholy Quran. Many things are ass backwards in the world of Islam, and the Quran is no exception. The Quran is the most harmful and corrupted book in existence, and yet brainwashed Muslim believers still think it pure and perfect. If the Quran is the unblemished word of god then gasoline is inflammable.

Muslims can never be free and know what it is to be fully and truly human. In fact Muslims do not want to be free. They want to be slaves.

Muslims hate freedom and want to deny it to themselves and others. For the end goal of Islam is to submit totally to Islam and become THE PERFECT SLAVE OF ALLAH.
If Muslims could only see that Islam/Allah is nothing more than Muhammad's 1400 year old lie that he used to enslave them with and turn them into his personal band of thieves and killers they would walk away from this twisted cult in a heart beat. And fortunately for both Muslims and non-Muslims this process is well under way. Muslims have now rightly  become ashamed of Islam and their criminal prophet.

Saleem Smith is a Canadian Ex-Muslim. He has his own site in which he expresses his views on Islam and other issues.

Thursday, September 23, 2010

MSM Hypocrisy

I was in Vienna on September 16th, 2010, the date of the Pope’s UK visit. As my practice in country’s where they don’t have English TV channels for entertainment sake, I flip through all the channels to look for any English language news channel.

So this particular day I just happened to be watching CNN as it was covering the Pope visit and I came upon the following comment from Monita Rajpal:

Listen in at about 1:20 where Monita asks Luke Coppen of the Catholic Herald, “There are huge expectation of the Pope, there are huge expectations of the Catholic church…what can the church as an entity do for victims?”

Now I am not saying that the priests that abused innocent children were not Catholics. I am also not saying that what they did is according to the Bible (because it is not). And on top of that, I am also not saying that the Pope should be let off the hook. The Pope is the head of the Catholic church so it is his responsibility to make the wrongs committed by priests under him right. However, CNN is putting all Catholics in one basket here. CNN wants or at least expects all Catholics to do something about the child abuse scandal even though it is not all of Catholics’ fault. Why does the “church as an entity” need to do something for the victims and not just the priests who are responsible for it?

I would let it pass if that was all I heard on CNN. But CNN covered the case of Nidal Hasan Malik way too differently (along with other Islamic terrorist attacks). Take a look:

Watch the whole video but listen to Dr. Phil and Shoshana at the end saying that holding Islam responsible for these acts, or rather even naming Islam in all of this, is “dangerous” and “irresponsible”.

Why is it so easy for these liberals to hold all Catholics responsible for what their priests did INSPITE of their religion but they can’t hold Muslims responsible for what they do BECAUSE of their religion? I know, I know…Muslims kill and threaten to kill so don’t tick them off. Whereas Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Wiccans, Freemasons, Scientologists etc don’t so they are fair game.

Friday, September 10, 2010

The Quran Burning


I don’t get why Muslims are up in arms about the planned/postponed Quran burning event. First, I don’t get what kind of stupid god they believe in who gets offended every two seconds. And second, wasn’t it their own caliph that started the practice of burning Qurans? Why aren’t they burning his grave down or attacking Saudi Arabia where he’s buried?

One of the authoritative Sunni hadiths from Sahih Bukhari enlightens us thus:

“Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham and the people of Iraq were Waging war to conquer Arminya and Adharbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to 'Uthman, "O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, "Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you." Hafsa sent it to 'Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin AzZubair, Said bin Al-As and 'AbdurRahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, "In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of Quraish, the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue." They did so, and when they had written many copies, 'Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. 'Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. Said bin Thabit added, "A Verse from Surat Ahzab was missed by me when we copied the Qur'an and I used to hear Allah's Apostle reciting it. So we searched for it and found it with Khuzaima bin Thabit Al-Ansari. (That Verse was): 'Among the Believers are men who have been true in their covenant with Allah.' (33.23)” Sahih Bukhari.

Now, it is well known that Muslims are hypocrites. This is just another example of hypocrisy on their part. As noted on this blog before and elsewhere, they are alright with their governments burning the Holy Bible and other books of non Islamic religious nature but when it comes to the Quran they just want to kill anyone who even thought about touching it with hands deemed unclean by Muslims.

What the above mentioned hadith shows is that burning a Quran, which is considered by Muslims of today as blasphemous, was employed as state policy by their dear caliph. He started it, go deal with him first!

I expect this from Muslims anyway. Yes, they will probably go out on the streets and endanger the lives of non Muslims all over and yes, burning a Quran would hurt their sensibilities…blah, blah, blah. What I don’t get is, where the hell’s the media when not just Bibles but Christians, human beings, are locked inside churches and then churches set on fire? Where are these so called “loving” Christians when in Indonesia, India, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, Egypt etc their Christian brothers and sisters are burned alive every day? Where is their love when their brethren are calling for help and they turn a blind eye?

You know, the Quran burning event is probably a stupid little idea but at the end of the day, it is what the people of that church know how to stand up to the idiocy of Islam. We can sit here and criticize that church as bigots and a cult but at least they are doing something…unlike millions upon millions of other Christians/infidels that just sit on their sorry butts and switch the channel whenever the news, if ever reported, comes on about Christians being killed.

I am neither in favor of nor against the Quran burning event. I am in favor of that church’s right to express what they want and I am also in favor of us not bending over backwards for the barbarians that call themselves Muslims. If I had to pick a side today, I would definitely back the church against Muslims. And if that comes at a cost, well I am ready to pay it. And finally my message to General Petraeus: Instead of being worried about your enemy getting ticked off, you might want to let your soldiers patrol the streets with their rifles loaded and maybe, just maybe, let them shoot the bastards that are trying to kill them and grow a pair of balls and order them to shoot to kill!

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Only In Israel

A new treatment that destroys HIV-infected human cells without damaging healthy ones has been developed by a team of Israeli researchers.

Hebrew University breakthrough in HIV treatment

Researchers at Hebrew University of Jerusalem may have made a major step forward in the race against AIDS.

The therapy, developed by scientists from the university's Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences and the Institute of Chemistry, destroys cells infected with HIV without damaging adjacent healthy cells. It is described in an article published last month in the scientific journal AIDS Research and Therapy.

To date, no therapy has succeeded in completely destroying HIV-infected cells. Current treatments only delay the development of the disease and make it more manageable. If treatment is halted, however, or the virus develops immunity to the cocktail of drugs now used, it can begin infecting new cells.

The new treatment fights HIV by causing infected cells to self-destruct. When the AIDS virus infects a cell, its DNA penetrates the cell, which then manufactures new HIV viruses that infect neighboring cells.
Triggering the cell to self-destruct

Dr. Abraham Loyter of HUJ explains that with the treatment peptides, or segments of short proteins that the scientists developed, interfere with the HIV virus's replication of its genetic material, by transmitting a massive number of replications of the genetic material into the infected cell, triggering its self-destruction.

"The usual medications kill the virus that has entered the body during infection, and the [peptide] treatment allows cells infected with the genetic load of the virus to be killed," Loyter said in an article in Israel's Ha'aretz newspaper.

The study by Loyter, Prof. Assaf Friedler, Dr. Aviad Levin, and Dr. Zvi Hayouka, examined the effectiveness of the new treatment on the HIV-1 virus, which is the predominant cause of AIDS in developing nations.

When the treatment, which was patented earlier this year, was applied to human cell cultures, the infected human cells disappeared in two weeks, and did not reappear up to two weeks later.
Animal and clinical trials ahead

Yissum, the HU technology transfer body, is seeking a commercial partner to continue developing the treatment through animal and clinical trials.

An estimated 33.4 million people worldwide are carriers of HIV, while in the US alone, it is estimated that more than one million people are living with HIV, while another half a million have died of AIDS. In Israel, in 2008, 390 new cases were reported, the highest figure in a decade.
The current breakthrough joins other new therapies being developed to fight AIDS, such as a US-funded study in Thailand of an AIDS vaccination, and a vaginal gel developed in South Africa that prevents replication of the virus and reduces the risk of infection by 54 percent.


Sunday, September 05, 2010

A rebuttal to Malaysia’s policy of censorship and fear

By The Anti Jihadist

For everyone who argues that Islam is supposed to be all about a ‘pluralistic’ society, have a look at this headline. From Saturday’s edition of the Star:

“PM wants MCMC to act against articles insulting Islam”

(Malaysian) Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on Saturday called for stern action by the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) against those who upload articles insulting Islam on their websites or social websites.

"The MCMC has to act. I hope they act firmly in this matter. This is something which cannot be allowed (to continue)," he said.

So, Mr. Prime Minster, what constitutes an ‘insult’ against Islam? This, of course, is left unsaid, and for all practical purposes, can be whatever the government says it is. Pronouncements such are these are liable to cause fear and self-censorship amongst pundits, bloggers and the intelligentsia. But this is precisely the point. And as for what sort of ‘stern action’ the Prime Minister has in mind for his enemies; again this is left unsaid. When the objective is to spread fear, it’s better to be vague than specific.

As events such as this shows the world time and time again, Muslims are almost universally against freedom of expression. A more cynical observer might say that Muslims are almost universally interested in having freedom of expression for themselves, but not for those who belong to other belief systems. What seems to interest Muslims the most, and Muslim-controlled governments especially, is the shutting down any sort of free discussion or debate. Malaysia, in fact, is ‘moderate’ in such matters, as ‘insulting Islam’ constitutes a capital crime in many other Muslim states. When Muslims repeatedly and loudly proclaim that their belief system is the perfect one, the true one, or the best one, what could Muslims possibly fear when others wish to debate the very subject?

Naturally, such a state of affairs bothers Muslims not the slightest. When was the last time you heard of a Muslim public protest in favour of freedom of expression? Cartoons and books and ‘infidel’ temples draw Muslim outrage, but what about when those who dare to say anything untoward about Mohammed or his ideology are silenced? Remember, silencing critics of Islam by threatening, arresting, torturing, imprisoning, exiling, or worse actually enjoys widespread Muslim support. The next Muslim who stands up for the right of infidels or anyone else to critique Islam, will be the first as far as I know.

What Najib and his ilk always fail to realize is how self-defeating their policies of censorship and fear are in the long run. History shows that to self-censor, to arrest freethinkers (or threaten to) is not only insidious, but self destructive. It ingrains the values of not thinking, not reasoning, but rote obedience and blind faith. It is a policy that encourages the dumb and blind, and drives away the smart and eloquent.

And Muslims keep wondering why they and their countries lag behind so many others in the world.